جیگرتونو برم از دیروز که ویدیو اومده تبریک بارون کردین مارو ❤️ شرمنده کردید ایشالا بیام تو عروسیاتون قر بدم 😂

Channel
عمو تئوری
@TheoAmoory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
67,235subscribers
+12,646 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001938179155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheoAmoory |
| Description | چنل رسمی عموتئوری در تلگرام🤝 اینجا راحت تریم تئوگنگ🗿 لینک پیام مستقیم به من : t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=93104657 پیج اینستا ، تیکتاک و چنل یوتوب 👇 سرچ کنین AmooTheory میاره |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheoAmoory |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 67,235 | +428 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 23:51 | 66,807 | +1,177 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:09 | 65,630 | +546 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:00 | 65,084 | +69 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 65,015 | +60 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:40 | 64,955 | +27 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:31 | 64,928 | +18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:57 | 64,910 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:02 | 64,904 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:45 | 64,902 | +56 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 64,846 | +53 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 64,793 | +173 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 64,620 | +51 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:47 | 64,569 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 64,577 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 64,579 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 64,576 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 64,591 | +15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:51 | 64,576 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 64,563 | first reading |
Engagement
1,051 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.8%
- avg views ÷ 67,235 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,590
- 371 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.79%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 371
- of 1,051 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 263 of 371 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,051 (7 August 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,185,370 |
| Reactions total | 102,356 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,270
- Videos
- ≈962
- Links
- ≈227
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23m 02s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
347,498 reactions across 891 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 136,206 | 39.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 113,403 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 51,696 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 11,173 | 3.22% | |
| 👀 | 11,065 | 3.18% | |
| 💯 | 7,351 | 2.12% | |
| 💔 | 5,705 | 1.64% | |
| 🗿 | 4,045 | 1.16% | |
| 🤯 | 2,614 | 0.752% | |
| 🫡 | 2,215 | 0.637% | |
| 🤝 | 2,009 | 0.578% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 0.003% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.001% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 891 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347,498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 88
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 40
- of 999 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheoAmoory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 371 posts held from the last 30 days (1.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
سلاممم به عمو و نازنین جونممم امیدوارم حالتون عالیه عالی باشه همیشه❤️ واقعاااا از ته دلم براتون خوشحال شدم و واقعا نمیدونم چجوریه که تاحالا نه شمارو دیدم نه نزدیکیم و هیچی ولی انقدرر که عاشقتونم انقدر که دوستون دارم انگار نزدیک ترین ادم زندگیمید و نه تنها برای من بلکه برای همه ی کسایی که دوستون دارن همینطوره✨ امیدوارم درکنار هم خوشبخت باشید بهترین اتفاق ها براتون رقم بخوره همیشه حالتون خوب باشه لبتون خندون باشه و همی…
سلامممممممم عموووو خوبی ؟ تاج سر🔥 خیلی مبارکتون باشه واقعا من تو چشم های شما دوتا چندسال پیش که گفتید قصد ازدواج و اینا ندارین میدیدم که یک روز واقعا باهم ازدواج میکنین . امیدوارم خوش بخت بشین و همیشه شاد باشین خیلی دوستتون دارم هم تورو خیلی زیاد هم نازنین رو خیلی زیاد به امید ولاگ های بیشتر از خودتون .امیدوارم تو زندگی تون به مشکلی برنخورین و اول از همه بتونین این پروسه ها رو تموم کنید با خیال راحت دوستتون دارم .❤️
Video, posted without a caption
عمو تئو و نازنین جونم پیوندتون خجسته نمیدونیم بعد از دیدن ویدیو چقدر ذوقی بودم گریم گرفته بود از خوشحالی دوستون دارم زیاد براتون یه زندگی قشنگ ارزو میکنم💍❤️ کژال یکی از تئو گنگی های دو اتیشه🔥 میشه لطفا اینو بزاری تویه چنل تلگرام❤️
جمعه میاد😁
ترکیب ویدیو امروزو ببیییییین اخه🔥
Voice message, posted without a caption
عمو اول اینکه امیدوارم خوشبخت بشین و همیشه در کنار هم بگین و بخندیننننن💋بعد یه سوال عمو جون،میگم که شما وقتی مجبور همیشه لحظات زندگیتو به اشتراک بذارین مثل همین خواستگاری اذیت نمیشین؟آخه شاید خصوصی باشه..✨
فداتون بشیممممم خیلی ارزشمنده برامون این پیاما و دلگرمی بهمون میده که تو روزای شلوغتون بازم مارو یادتون هست 🥲❤️
الهی من قربونتون برم فقط خدا میدونه چقدر از به هم رسیدنتون خوشحالم ممکنه شما خیلی وقت باشه از نظر خودتون مال همدیگه این یا باهم زندگی میکنین ولی از دید ما همین مراسمات انگار بهمون ثابت میکنه که شما مال هم شدین البته که مهم اون پیوند قلبیه خیلی خیلی خوشحالمون کردین از اینکه به هم وفادار بودین ، برای هم تلاش کردین ، بخاطر همدیگه از خیلی خوشی ها و کارا زدین ، برای ما وقت گزاشتین ، مارو تو لحظات خوشتون شریک دونستین باور …
قربون شماااا ❤️❤️❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,051 posts we hold for @TheoAmoory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TheoAmoory edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 7 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @TheoAmoory as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 6
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوست دارید کدوم شرکت کننده به فینال مسابقه یک درصد برگرده؟
- نیلوفر72%
- ساحل54%
- مهشاد30%
- آتنا41%
- نازنین41%
- پریساپوربلک26%
The shares total 264%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دوست دارید کدوم شرکت کننده به فینال مسابقه یک درصد برگرده؟
- نیلوفر74%
- ساحل57%
- مهشاد33%
- آتنا40%
- نازنین40%
- پریساپوربلک25%
The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دوست دارید کدوم شرکت کننده به مرحله بعدی یک درصد راه پیدا کنه؟
- سایه7%
- پرستو5%
- هیوا(hiwagirl)27%
- آتنا38%
- بیگاتی12%
- نازنین45%
- نیلوفر74%
- مونس19%
- مهشاد35%
- پریسا(پیکسی)14%
The shares total 276%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بهترین بازیکن بازی رعال سوسیسدار VS نوردساید از نظر شما👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
- امیر روز37%
- تاینی9%
- علی ردوکس9%
- یاسین رونسفید 😂21%
- علی شکری (دروازبان رعال سوسیس)13%
- احسان میرزاد11%
- عمو تعوری53%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دوست دارید کدوم شرکت کننده به فینال مسابقه یک درصد برگرده؟
- اشکان شادکامی94%
- خشایار وزیری64%
- مبین پهلوان15%
- حسن امیری20%
- مهراد شعبانی11%
- علی yl12%
- سهیل yl13%
- اشکان yl13%
- صدرا جواهری16%
- مستر پانک16%
The shares total 274%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
کی میزنه؟ 👀
- بارسا 💙❤️62%
- پاریس 💙🤍45%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@arslwnhs · 26,94618 postsNAZANINBEAUTYBLOG💓
@nazaninbeautyblog · 30,95916 postsKellovaa
@kellovaaa · 24,4386 postsMamareza free 17
@mamareza_17 · 16,3075 postsArianArix 🦉
@ArianArix7 · 1524 postsعلیرضا متعالی
@matali1 · 55,4544 postsAmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 44,1883 postsAlisha !
@Alirezashadpoor · 1,6142 postsسم اسنو
@Samsnowww · 21,9602 postsامیر موفق
@amirmovafaghhh · 9,8692 postsHami KM
@hamikm · 30,5922 postsTentukasra
@kasrashahabadifamily · 1772 postsسهیل پرنک
@sohiprank · 78,1622 postsبابک و آرین
@babakoarian · 37,5171 postمهد کودک مهگل 🩵🎀
@mhgolfrz · 12,5361 postRAVESHOP🥀
@rave_shop · 9,3351 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@nazaninbeautyblog · 30,95946 postsارسلان اچ اس
@arslwnhs · 26,94638 postsHidden Chat
@HidenChat_bot · 852,62628 postsKellovaa
@kellovaaa · 24,43815 postsبنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 279,5049 postsMamareza free 17
@mamareza_17 · 16,3077 postsامیر موفق
@amirmovafaghhh · 9,8696 postsHami KM
@hamikm · 30,5925 postsعلیرضا متعالی
@matali1 · 55,4545 postsمهد کودک مهگل 🩵🎀
@mhgolfrz · 12,5365 postsArman The Freak
@armanthefreak · 6,1454 postsTentukasra
@kasrashahabadifamily · 1774 postsLoco
@LocoTeamStudio · 19,8923 postsAmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 44,1882 postsحامدشاهانی
@hamedshahanii · 28,1422 postsAlisha !
@Alirezashadpoor · 1,6141 postسم اسنو
@Samsnowww · 21,9601 postعلی بیگزموگ
@gangezmoge · 64,2741 postMehran MK
@mehrankoufi · 1,3751 postسهیل پرنک
@sohiprank · 78,1621 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@alizelzelee · 28,863#1
@drtel · 780,182#2
@mrkaroshii · 4,685#3
@alizodiac · 14,291#4
@solbasoheil · 122,439#5
@mr_feshar · 12,673#6
@hiphopfunquiz · 100,358#7
@Misaghsch1 · 13,445#8
@tekidolife · 231,185#9
@Ghost_Review · 3,341#10
@futballbadtv · 318,260#11
@Thebeniamin · 279,504#12
@Samsnowww · 21,960#13
@iMTProto · 7,734,028#14
@rapking · 313,887#15
@SportBaadNews · 871,829#16
@iRoProxy · 8,016,415#17
@HipHopTweety · 275,895#18
@MEMENTOSTUDIOS · 130,987#19
@bistodo · 406,885#20
@RaaSaa · 7,846#21
@putakk · 218,098#22
@proxy_qavi · 3,242,000#23
@FutballBadBoys · 107,666#24
@mahdiabshahi · 64,642#25
@MemeHubOriginal · 92,205#26
@mofkabrothers · 5,718#27
@hip_hopi · 398,402#28
@darkproxy · 4,545,118#29
@zifootball · 3,441#30
@MeshkiOrg · 22,064#31
@RegaPlus · 1,517,748#32
@PesPars · 72,428#33
@rezaayeenetg · 21,870#34
@saeedraf · 6,782#35
@FUTBALLI18 · 477,716#36
@amireyzed · 44,188#37
@Aliztory · 161,197#38
@iWLTserver · 21,485#39
@raptv · 397,812#40
@zZRap · 63,230#41
@MiaPlaysKobss · 15,421#42
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,009,450#43
@afshartikk · 132,311#44
@iWsquad · 10,882#45
@tweet_Khabari · 612,083#46
@vigiatonet · 83,803#47
@fcc_mobo · 12,638#48
@ipokoChannel · 1,770#49
@SportBadTweet · 136,761#50
@Island120 · 48,057#51
@olaghiadroit · 62,764#52
@bistodo_tweet · 29,384#53
@gifkoshr · 76,940#54
@ashkan_kagan · 119,985#55
@RapGodNews · 180,642#56
@proxymtprotoir · 4,114,695#57
@funhiphop · 287,517#58
@akh_mam · 178,389#59
@roidbest · 1,616,968#60
@futbadfun · 155,491#61
@SPORTinoTV · 55,546#62
@Memwe_land · 22,719#63
@ManixVid · 98,813#64
@thoroush_club · 5,269#65
@rapcity · 82,473#66
@HipSoccer · 3,532#67
@RemixFori · 11,563#68
@proxymtproto · 11,855,186#69
@vaarzesh_plus · 317,288#70
@Barca_We · 261,774#71
@Fortnite_Br · 39,704#72
@Realmadrid_we · 273,049#73
@EAFC_PRIME · 1,893,805#74
@PES_M · 81,083#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alizelzelee · 28,863
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@solbasoheil · 122,439
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@tekidolife · 231,185
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
@matali1 · 55,454
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
@hamikm · 30,592
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 September 2026
@Thebeniamin · 279,504
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@mahdiabshahi · 64,642
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@Samsnowww · 21,960
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عمو تئوری” (@TheoAmoory), 67,235 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheoAmoory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.