Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
23,200 average views per post against 27,277 subscribers — an engagement rate of 85.0%. Across the 4,324 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.20%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
371,040
Mature posts only
107.6% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,121–27,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 06:54
27,277
-7
11 Aug 2026, 07:34
27,284
+2
10 Aug 2026, 07:06
27,282
+140
9 Aug 2026, 07:11
27,142
-9
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
27,151
-17
6 Aug 2026, 21:15
27,168
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:04
27,168
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
94.5%
avg views ÷ 27,277 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,800
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
25 (1 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
360,780
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
420
Videos
233
Links
59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
أنا أرى شيئًا أكثر إيلامًا:
نعرف اسم محمد، ونجهل محمدًا.
نختلف على مذهبه، ولا نقرأ سيرته.
نبكي على وفاته، ولا نبكي على أخلاقه التي تموت فينا كل يوم.
أي حبٍّ هذا الذي يحفظ اسم الحبيب، ثم يخون وصيته؟
محمد لم يكن بحاجة إلى ملايين الألسن التي تصلي عليه؛
كان بحاجة إلى أناسٍ إذا قالوا «نحب محمدًا»، ظهر محمدٌ في أخلاقهم.
رحم الله رسول الله والسلام على الزهراء المظلومة، وعلى أهل بيت النبوة.
ولعل أقسى ما في المأساة أن مح…
ليست كلُّ خطوةٍ إلى كربلاء تُقَرِّبُ من الحسين…
فالطريق لا يقدّسه ازدحامه، ولا ترفعه كثرة الرايات، ولا تمنحه الهتافاتُ معنى. الطريق يبقى طريقًا حتى تمشيه النيّة.
أذكر الأربعينية يوم كانت تمشي بصمتٍ يشبه الدعاء؛ ننطلق من العزيزية، ننام في المواكب، نأكل مما يُقسَم لنا، ونحمل في قلوبنا الحسين… لا أكثر.
أما اليوم، فأرى الطريق وقد أثقلته الرايات الحزبية وأعلام الدول، وتزاحمت فيه الشعارات حتى صار الإنسان يبحث عن الحسين …
أخطرُ ما يكشفه المرض، أنه لا يختبر الجسد…
بل يختبر الأسماء التي كنتَ تظنها وطنًا.
فبعضُ الناس لا يغيبون عنك عندما ترحل، بل يغيبون عنك وأنت ما زلتَ تتألّم
إذا ألقى الزمانُ عليكَ شرًّا
وصارَ العيشُ في دنياكَ مُرّا
فلا تجزعْ لحالِكَ بل تذكَّرْ
كمْ أمضيتَ في الخيراتِ عُمرًا
فربُّ الكونِ ما أبكاكَ إلا
لِتعلمَ أنَّ بعدَ العُسرِ يُسرًا
أنتم مخلوقون مكرَّمون عند الله قبل النتائج، وبعدها. ﴿وَلَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي آدَمَ﴾، هذا تكريم لا تمنحه الدرجات ولا يسلبه الرسوب.
Signed أ. علي الهاشمي 𖧾
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @infinity511. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 92,822 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
برلين للتعليم @X4DDD · 219,298 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
سنتر الجامعة | Al-Santer @santer_jamea · 211,109 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية @Newton1998 · 397,271 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
المُصْحَف @lAlMosahfl · 770,523 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
شبكة جامعيون @collegeton · 234,123 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer @santer_sads · 361,840 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ سجاد العبيدي @sajjadobaidy · 215,508 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
الأستاذ حسين محمد @teacher_mh · 275,462 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
الأستاذ حسن فلاح @hfbioo · 172,239 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
المنقذ في الأنكليزي || أ.محمد العبيدي @dr_English1 · 336,981 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
تسلا للتعليم | Tesla @TeslaAws · 299,096 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ علي السوداني @ALSudaneAli · 221,833 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
الأستاذ مؤيد سليم الزيدي @Muaid92 · 334,923 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ حيدر وليد @haiderwaleed · 470,961 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
قناة الهيتي للتميز🩺 @xd6xd6 · 170,376 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
ابن تلعفر @k4kkk · 352,552 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
أ.حيدر عبدالائمه @hayderabdamaa11 · 308,156 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
سالم ال منصور @Salimalmansour98bio · 264,232 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
وزارة التربية العراقية @educationiq · 602,706 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
جريدة الصباح العراقية @alsbaahiq · 495,913 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INFINITY 𖧾” (@infinity511), 27,277 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infinity511.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
