قناة المُغني في التربية الإسلامية
أماكن التدريس :
۞ | معهد المجد الاهلي "زيونة"
۞ | معهد علي فلاح الخاقاني "زيونة"
۞ | معهد قمة النجاح "المنصور"
۩ للتواصل : @ammar_f_k
﴿ اللَّهُ لا إِلهَ إِلّا هُوَ لَهُ الأَسماءُ الحُسنى ﴾
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
31,200 average views per post against 56,251 subscribers — an engagement rate of 55.4%. Across the 2,108 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,630–99,814 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.61% and 10.8%, with a median of 4.87%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
374,160
Mature posts only
46.6% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -5,392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,442–62,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 23:17
56,251
-28
19 Sept 2026, 05:38
56,279
-212
16 Sept 2026, 23:00
56,491
-243
15 Sept 2026, 02:18
56,734
-154
13 Sept 2026, 12:59
56,888
-379
11 Sept 2026, 15:57
57,267
-940
8 Sept 2026, 22:58
58,207
-392
5 Sept 2026, 17:40
58,599
-224
3 Sept 2026, 16:22
58,823
-308
2 Sept 2026, 06:33
59,131
-156
1 Sept 2026, 06:46
59,287
-79
31 Aug 2026, 03:15
59,366
-120
30 Aug 2026, 03:17
59,486
-80
29 Aug 2026, 06:47
59,566
-176
28 Aug 2026, 07:15
59,742
-214
27 Aug 2026, 07:11
59,956
-16
26 Aug 2026, 06:32
59,972
-80
25 Aug 2026, 08:55
60,052
-127
24 Aug 2026, 08:27
60,179
-99
22 Aug 2026, 18:15
60,278
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 56,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,200
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.552%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
41 (22 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
374,160
Reactions total
2,066
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈46
Links
≈415
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,366 reactions across 41 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,919
89.8%
😍
125
2.86%
🔥
123
2.82%
👍
101
2.31%
🥰
98
2.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 41 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Amar_fadll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#انتباه 📢
طلبة اليوتيوب الأعزاء 🌸❤️
أي طالب أو طالبة يجي يمتحن يوم الجمعة أو السبت في الامتحان النهائي للوحدتين الأولى والثانية ويحصل على درجة 100 إله كودات مجانية 🎁🔥
تدلّلون وإن شاء الله أشوفكم كلكم من المتفوقين ❤️🌸
انتباه 📢
السلام عليكم طلبتي الأعزاء 🌸❤️
سيتم إجراء امتحان فاينل للوحدة الأولى والوحدة الثانية، كل وحدة على حدة، والامتحان متاح لجميع الطلبة في العراق من دون استثناء.
يعني الامتحان مو فقط لطلابي وطالباتي، وإنما يحق لأي طالب أو طالبة المشاركة، سواء كان يتابعني على اليوتيوب أو يدرس عند أستاذ آخر، فالامتحان مفتوح للجميع ❤️
📅 مواعيد الامتحان:
الجمعة 25/9:
جميع المحافظات + بغداد/الرصافة.
السبت 26/9:
بغداد/الكرخ.
📍 ا…
بالدورة الشتوية، نبدي وياك من البداية
ونمشي وياك خطوة بخطوة للنهاية.
فتح باب التسجيل على الدورة الشتوية للأستاذ عمار فاضل لمادة الإسلامية
تبدا من بداية المنهج بتاريخ 1\10
السعر|
المنهج الكامل
-امتحانات إلكترونية بسعر 150 ألف
-امتحانات حضورية بسعر 200 ألف
🔗للتسجيل والاستفسار، الاتصال على: 7754
📱 الواتساب: https://wa.me/9647740002767
📱 التيليجرام : https://t.me/mirmaz_pos
#الدورة_الشتوية_تبدي_وياك_من_الصفر
#اني_مرم…
▫️الدورة الثنائيــة للمُسند والمُغنــي▫️
⭐️الرياضــيات + الاسلامية➖2027⭐️
➖ أ. #حيدر_وليد + أ. #عمار_فاضل ➖
✔️ تشمل دورة الرياضيات :
⭕تبدأ من الفصل الثالث
⭕اعطاء الفصل 1 + 2 مجاناً
✔️ وتشمل دورة الإسلامية :
⭕تبدأ من بداية المنهج
🎁 #عروض الدورة :
⭐ أول 10 حجوزات تحصل ملزمة اسلامية + توصيل مجاناً
⭐ ثاني 10 حجوزات تحصل توصيل مجاني
💰 سعر الدورة ⬅ 275 الف فقط
⭐️ #للحجز والتواصل عبر :
⚫️التليكـرام➖@mktaba_Santer
✔️ م…
لا استاذي بس ماتوقعت انت ماسك حساب الاضافات اعذرني انصدمت 😂❤️
❤163🥰5🔥3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Amar_fadll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
الأستاذ أحمد النداوي | كيمياء السادس العلمي @x_chemistry_x · 89,822#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الاستاذ ساجد العگيلي @Sajid_AlOqailly · 110,767 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
الاستاذ حسين حمزة @hussainhamza98 · 77,373 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
قناة المساعد الجامعية 🎓 @IraqiUni · 53,297 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
باتمان السادس ⚕ @P2BBB · 35,244 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
الاستاذ محمد الجنائي @suhaeb_aga · 55,951 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
برلين للتعليم @X4DDD · 202,208 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
الاستاذ نورس الموسوي @nwras_80 · 46,973 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
الاستاذ ماهر نايف @Biochanal · 34,784 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
الاستاذ مهند السوداني @MohannedALSudane · 31,084 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
الاستاذ علي الذهبي (مدرس الفيزياء) 2026 @alqamf · 73,462 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
الاستاذ محمد حسين @h2moh7 · 21,818 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
النائب محمود القيسي @mahmood_AlQaisi · 33,351 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
الاستاذ جعفر الحسني @Biojaffar · 95,450 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
الاستاذ عصام الشمري @Esam_6 · 71,751 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
اللغة الانكليزية - الست ازل سلوان @azal_95 · 50,667 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
الاستاذ هشام المعموري @hish84 · 237,078 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
شبكة صنّاع الٲمل التعليمية @IRAQEDU2019 · 96,138 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
الاستاذ علي السوداني @ALSudaneAli · 216,496 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
سنتر الملازم | Al-Santer @santer_malazem · 65,070 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
الاستاذ حيدر وليد @haiderwaleed · 452,905 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
المتحدي للوزاري || أ.احمد فوزي @TTTHT · 121,253 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
استاذ علاء السعداوي - اللغة الانكليزية @alaaigabbar · 67,053 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
الأستاذ مؤيد سليم الزيدي @Muaid92 · 388,933 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
سالم ال منصور @Salimalmansour98bio · 252,680 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الاستاذ عمار فاضل” (@Amar_fadll), 56,251 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amar_fadll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.