Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чурсин | Императивная лента

@chursin_imperative

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955090662
TypeChannel
Username@chursin_imperative
DescriptionБуду говорить честно. Моё портфолио в формате блога: стоматология, проекты и осознание. Канал «Волонтёров Улыбки» https://t.me/volontery_ulybki Канал «СНО «Детская стоматология» https://t.me/SNO_Childrens_Dentistry_KemSMU
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/chursin_imperative

Growth

1217 Aug 2026, 18:25 — 121 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 121 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:259 Aug 2026, 04:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:01121no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:25121first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.7%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held5 (21 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total446
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
224
Videos
54
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54065788430812582681329.5%
custom 49835173875348937541227.3%
custom 5204239454843182964818.2%
custom 5413825479406789631715.9%
custom 520665098019565552524.55%
custom 521989859636675650612.27%
custom 541836004145339745812.27%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 5 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chursin_imperative. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @doktorgptPhoto

Осваиваем любую тему без платных курсов — в сети раскопали полезные промты, с которыми ChatGPT поможет вам стать экспертом в теме за пару дней. Забираем: 🔴 Учеба по методу Фейнмана: Объясни мне концепцию/тему [НАЗВАНИЕ ТЕМЫ], так, будто мне 10 лет. Используй самые простые метафоры и аналогии из реальной жизни. 🔴 Пошаговая дорожная карта (Roadmap): Я хочу с нуля освоить навык [НАЗВАНИЕ, например: копирайтинг]. Сост

custom 54138254794067896314

23 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

А вы: что для вас важнее

  1. Свобода быть одному53%
  2. Сила быть в команде65%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTC104 views14 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

КОМАНДА ИЛИ ОДИН. ВОПРОС ВЫБОРА ИЛИ ЦЕНЫ Что лучше: отличаться или быть как все? С командой или в одного? Деньги или лояльность? Инициатива или стабильность? Каждый раз, когда я не знаю ответа, хочется обратиться к мифическому существу, которое без предрассудков расставит точки над i. Скажет: «Иди туда. Делай так». Честно: окружение рядом — близкое и дорогое. Но вопросы, которые я задаю, чаще всего не в их компете

custom 49835173875348937546custom 54065788430812582685custom 54138254794067896313

22 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC82 views8 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026

Категоричность суждения - признак слабого ума 🔑

custom 52042394548431829643custom 54065788430812582683custom 52066509801956555252

21 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC99 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Если бы у меня узнали, что почитать:

custom 49835173875348937546custom 52042394548431829645custom 54065788430812582685custom 52198985963667565061custom 54183600414533974581

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @chursin_imperative. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

А вы: что для вас важнее

  1. Свобода быть одному53%
  2. Сила быть в команде65%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чурсин | Императивная лента” (@chursin_imperative), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chursin_imperative.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.