Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Циничный Диджитал

@cynical_digital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

236subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002664618635
TypeChannel
Username@cynical_digital
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cynical_digital

Growth

236239237.56 August 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 238 subscribers14 August 2026 — 236 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 236–239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:06236-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:44238-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:33239no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:18239first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.9%
avg views ÷ 236 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total805
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁13560.8%
🔥3817.1%
🤣177.66%
146.31%
👏104.50%
💯41.80%
🥱31.35%
🐳10.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026

кстати, не думайте, что я забыл. но мне кажется, что она забыла про нумерацию... либо часть 1 ещё не завершилась. если так, то на другие части меня не хватит.

3 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC78 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Циничный Диджитал | Дайджест дня (3.08.2026). Все события в мире диджитал-маркетинга глазами человека, который уже 3 дня не спит, пьёт кофе из чайника и видит сквозь фальшь, а местами — сквозь тончайшие слои здравого смысла. Кофеин уже не штырит, а на столе догорает остаток последней нервной клетки. И тут в ленте материализуется Слава Фёдоров (@yandex_fedorov) с позывным «иксперд», который вышел на сцену и споткнул

👏6😁4🤣2

31 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC115 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я знаю, ждёте меня

😁6💯32🤣2

20 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC203 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На правах анонса. Видит Бог, я этого не хотел. Мемы про "печенегов и половцев" и "я вам расскажу, откуда всё готовилось", заиграли новыми красками.

😁11🔥3

16 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC221 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Циничный Диджитал | Дайджест дня (16.07.2026) Все события в мире диджитал-маркетинга глазами человека, который уже три дня не спит, пьёт остывший кофе прямо из горлышка чайника и видит сквозь дешёвые манипуляции. Сегодня в нашем зоопарке день открытых дверей в вольере для авторов с завышенным ЧСВ и единственный клоун сегодняшней арены — Слава Фёдоров (@yandex_fedorov), который осознал себя Венчеславом и решил броси

😁11🤣8🔥51

14 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC188 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На правах анонса, который меня ни к чему не обязывает Пока есть ощущение, что самый содержательный кусок поста уже на превью. Как трейлер фильма, который пересказал весь сюжет. Фильма о том, как опытный директолог научился определять предсказывать судьбу бизнеса по брифу.

😁7

13 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC159 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Циничный Диджитал | Официальное покаяние Знаете, я долго иронизировал над инфоцыганщиной, стебал директологов, молодых и не очень, делал вид, что мне абсолютно плевать на правила приличия. Но сегодня настал тот день, когда броня даёт трещину. Когда ты смотришь в чёрный экран монитора и чувствуешь, как по позвоночнику ползёт леденящее чувство вины. Сегодня я проснулся, сделал глоток кофе из чайника и пролистывая с

🔥11😁71🐳1

10 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC186 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

продолжение... Раз мы заговорили о том, как нейросети пишут тексты, самое время продать вам курс, как это делать правильно. Чтобы, не дай Бог, мы не начали думать самостоятельно, Дарья Дейн (@dein_ads) напоминает, что настал последний день записи на курс «НейроДирект»! Если не купишь прямо сейчас — всё, жизнь кончена, ты останешься копаться в настройках, как нищий раб. Аргументация проста: директолог без нейросете

😁8🔥31

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cynical_digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 572,914 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Циничный Диджитал” (@cynical_digital), 236 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cynical_digital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.