кстати, не думайте, что я забыл. но мне кажется, что она забыла про нумерацию... либо часть 1 ещё не завершилась. если так, то на другие части меня не хватит.

Channel
Циничный Диджитал
@cynical_digital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
236subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002664618635 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cynical_digital |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cynical_digital |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 236 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 238 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 239 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 239 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.9%
- avg views ÷ 236 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 134
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 805 |
| Reactions total | 70 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
222 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 135 | 60.8% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 17.1% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 7.66% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 6.31% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 4.50% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.80% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Циничный Диджитал | Дайджест дня (3.08.2026). Все события в мире диджитал-маркетинга глазами человека, который уже 3 дня не спит, пьёт кофе из чайника и видит сквозь фальшь, а местами — сквозь тончайшие слои здравого смысла. Кофеин уже не штырит, а на столе догорает остаток последней нервной клетки. И тут в ленте материализуется Слава Фёдоров (@yandex_fedorov) с позывным «иксперд», который вышел на сцену и споткнул…
👏6😁4🤣2
я знаю, ждёте меня
😁6💯3❤2🤣2
Sticker, posted without a caption
На правах анонса. Видит Бог, я этого не хотел. Мемы про "печенегов и половцев" и "я вам расскажу, откуда всё готовилось", заиграли новыми красками.
😁11🔥3
Циничный Диджитал | Дайджест дня (16.07.2026) Все события в мире диджитал-маркетинга глазами человека, который уже три дня не спит, пьёт остывший кофе прямо из горлышка чайника и видит сквозь дешёвые манипуляции. Сегодня в нашем зоопарке день открытых дверей в вольере для авторов с завышенным ЧСВ и единственный клоун сегодняшней арены — Слава Фёдоров (@yandex_fedorov), который осознал себя Венчеславом и решил броси…
😁11🤣8🔥5❤1
Posted without readable text
😁6
Блэт, как это отменить?
😁10
Posted without readable text
😁4
На правах анонса, который меня ни к чему не обязывает Пока есть ощущение, что самый содержательный кусок поста уже на превью. Как трейлер фильма, который пересказал весь сюжет. Фильма о том, как опытный директолог научился определять предсказывать судьбу бизнеса по брифу.
😁7
Циничный Диджитал | Официальное покаяние Знаете, я долго иронизировал над инфоцыганщиной, стебал директологов, молодых и не очень, делал вид, что мне абсолютно плевать на правила приличия. Но сегодня настал тот день, когда броня даёт трещину. Когда ты смотришь в чёрный экран монитора и чувствуешь, как по позвоночнику ползёт леденящее чувство вины. Сегодня я проснулся, сделал глоток кофе из чайника и пролистывая с…
🔥11😁7❤1🐳1
продолжение... Раз мы заговорили о том, как нейросети пишут тексты, самое время продать вам курс, как это делать правильно. Чтобы, не дай Бог, мы не начали думать самостоятельно, Дарья Дейн (@dein_ads) напоминает, что настал последний день записи на курс «НейроДирект»! Если не купишь прямо сейчас — всё, жизнь кончена, ты останешься копаться в настройках, как нищий раб. Аргументация проста: директолог без нейросете…
😁8🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cynical_digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 572,914 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@best_direkt · 9,6203 postsФедоров про контекст
@yandex_fedorov · 4,1613 postsЧестно про рекламу Яндекс.Директ| И.Ларькина | Контекстная реклама
@larkina_kontext · 1,5422 posts100 лет в Директ | Алексей Абак | Реклама и Автоматизация
@ads_100y · 5451 postГеоргий Подуков | Боли рекламщика
@bolirekla · 1821 postБудни директолога
@budni_direct · 1,3891 postДарья Дейн | Worldwide ads
@dein_ads · 5,8601 postРоман Улин | Яндекс Директ
@direct_ulin · 2,7721 postРеклама в Яндекс Директ💡Директологика
@directologika · 1,3961 postКсения О | Яндекс Директ и digital маркетинге
@ksenia_o_reklame · 1,8801 postДмитрий Светленко | Интернет-маркетинг
@sd_direct · 8041 postШпаргалки по Яндекс Директу
@trafficonwb · 3,8641 postАнна и ее директологово
@usefuladv · 1,2351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Циничный Диджитал” (@cynical_digital), 236 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cynical_digital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.