Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дарья Дейн | Worldwide ads

Channel

Дарья Дейн | Worldwide ads

@dein_ads

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,974subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831048139
TypeChannel
Username@dein_ads
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dein_ads

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,8587,3846,6216 August 2026 — 5,861 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,861 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,865 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,858 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,860 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,866 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,872 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,862 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,919 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,383 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,969 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,916 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,917 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,923 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,937 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,922 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,384 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,145 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,947 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,950 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,958 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,960 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,979 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,978 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,975 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,972 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,974 subscribers5,9746 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,629–7,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 03:185,974+2
5 Nov 2026, 19:455,972-3
2 Nov 2026, 15:545,975-3
31 Oct 2026, 01:565,978-1
27 Oct 2026, 19:165,979+19
24 Oct 2026, 14:305,960+2
21 Oct 2026, 16:575,958+8
18 Oct 2026, 01:475,950+3
15 Oct 2026, 04:065,947-198
12 Oct 2026, 00:376,145-1,239
5 Oct 2026, 05:577,384+1,462
26 Sept 2026, 18:395,922-15
17 Sept 2026, 07:015,937+14
13 Sept 2026, 12:195,923+6
9 Sept 2026, 16:405,917+1
4 Sept 2026, 09:375,916-53
1 Sept 2026, 03:385,969-1,414
29 Aug 2026, 00:557,383+1,464
25 Aug 2026, 14:475,919+57
22 Aug 2026, 18:445,862first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 5,974 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (16 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total14,441
Reactions total522
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 03s
Average length
4m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,459 reactions across 39 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥49433.9%
❤34123.4%
👍30520.9%
😁835.69%
💔644.39%
💯604.11%
👌312.12%
🎉291.99%
👏171.17%
🍾140.96%
🙏70.48%
❤‍🔥60.411%
🍌50.343%
🎄30.206%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,492 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 40 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dein_ads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC921 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026

После вчерашнего поста личка разрывается. Мне написало более 20 человек, у некоторых по несколько клиентов хотят запуститься. Получается, много у кого все же есть клиенты на Google ads 🙃

❤14😁9🔥5🍌1

2 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,090 views37 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Реклама в Google Ads без зарубежного юр- или физлица Для начала нужно ещё раз обозначить: без зарубежного юр- или физлица самостоятельно запустить рекламу не получится. Но есть другой вариант — работать через зарубежную агентскую инфраструктуру. Как это выглядит: в Google Ads есть что-то типа агентского аккаунта в Яндексе — My Client Center (MCC). Он позволяет создавать внутри своей инфраструктуры новые рекламные к…

🔥27❤10

29 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,500 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Проверки рекламодателя в Google Ads В прошлом посте я писала, что специалист может спокойно настраивать и вести Google Ads из России. Но сам рекламодатель должен быть зарегистрирован в другой стране. Теперь подробнее о том, что понадобится, чтобы самостоятельно создать рекламный кабинет и запустить рекламу. 💵 Зарубежный способ оплаты Банковская карта или счёт и данные о плательщике. Без платёжного профиля не получ…

❤18🔥7🍾6👍5👌3

27 Oct 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,420 views61 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Как работать с Google Ads из России: нюансы и ограничения Для начала давайте констатируем важные факты. Самое важное: в России нет государственного запрета на работу специалистов с Google Ads. Такая работа не нарушает российское законодательство, и штрафы за неё не предусмотрены. Не путайте с рекламой в Meta*. Ограничения, о которых пойдёт речь дальше, введены компанией Google и касаются рекламодателей, а не специа…

👌28❤19👍8🔥3😁3

25 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,580 views70 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня выступаю на Суровом Питерском Форуме В 15:00, поток №9 «Нейросети в маркетинге» - общий сбор директологов! Будем говорить про то, как директологам создавать скиллы для передачи рутины нейросетям. Показываю на примере своего скилла по аудиту Яндекс Директа. • Эволюция работы с ИИ: от чатика до своего инструмента • Что такое SKILLmd и почему «инструмент разработчиков» подходит для задач директолога • Подключ…

👍33🔥22❤11❤‍🔥4

21 Oct 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,940 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Кому сейчас нужна реклама в Google Ads? Многие при словах «работа с иностранными клиентами» представляют себе переговоры, например, с французами и тут же падают в обморок. Где их таких найти, как с ними говорить? Давайте разберёмся. С уходом системы из РФ многие подзабили на работу с Гуглом. И, на мой взгляд, очень зря. Есть огромное количество русскоязычных людей по всему миру, кому это интересно. Сделаю на этом а…

🔥22👍13😁3❤1

19 Oct 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,750 views53 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Почему я продолжила работать с Google Ads после 2022 года Раньше, до «разделения», для 90% клиентов я настраивала рекламу в обеих системах. Когда Google объявил о приостановке рекламы в России, я поставила себе цель продолжить работать. Поэтому буквально с момента ухода Гугла я активно занялась поиском проектов и сосредоточилась на том, чтобы не терять практику. Было понятно, что будет сложнее и придется как-то вы…

👍32🔥10❤6😁5

15 Oct 2026, 05:40 UTC≈2,150 views74 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В свете последних событий… Что будет, если завтра вам предложат проект в Google Ads? Говорят, в нынешние времена спроса на Google Ads не так много. Но мне постоянно прилетают запросы, хотя я сейчас никак не рекламирую свои услуги. Многие из них я перекидываю в чат выпускников курса, некоторые раздаю адресно знакомым спецам, какие-то беру себе. Запросы прилетают по сарафану, от прошлых клиентов, по рекомендациям, про…

👍48❤15😁8💯3

14 Oct 2026, 07:40 UTC≈2,090 views120 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ностальгия по временам, когда мерч Google доезжал в Россию, да и вообще жизнь была попроще…

💔62🔥30❤28

12 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,170 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Думать всё равно придётся Несмотря на всеобщую автоматизацию, мозг отменить все ещё не удается 🙃 Google, как трендсеттер в контекстной рекламе, идёт по такой логике: отдаёт алгоритмам всё больше технической работы, но одновременно повышает требования к уровню решений специалиста. Например, в 2026-м изменилась работа стратегий tCPA и tROAS в кампаниях, которые получали статус «ограничено бюджетом». Теперь стратегия…

👍14🔥8❤4

8 Oct 2026, 06:22 UTC≈2,090 views32 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Если алгоритмы такие умные, почему до сих пор результаты хреновые? В последнее время мы много говорили о прогрессе рекламных технологий. Из чего вытекает логический вопрос: почему, учитывая весь прогресс, все ещё получаются плохие результаты рекламных кампаний? И ответ на мой взгляд достаточно простой: на данный момент никакие алгоритмы не способны заменить мышление. Мне нравится аналогия с молотком. Специалист — …

🔥19👍8😁5

6 Oct 2026, 05:18 UTC≈1,950 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026

📦 Контроль начинается с понимания: Финал серии Подошла к концу большая серия постов про историю развития рекламных алгоритмов. В ней мы проследили историю становления систем контекстной рекламы. Посмотрели, как на рекламу влияли внешние факторы, какие изменения происходили и как менялась логика управления. От круглосуточного мониторинга ставок до их автоматического расчета, от тысяч ключей к автотаргетингу, от ручн…

🔥25❤11👍3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @dein_ads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс про аналитику
@YAN_analytic · 20,922
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Полина Бондарева про контекст
@pbondareva · 19,479
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
Практикум про диджитал-профессии
@mrkt_practicum · 25,326
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарья Дейн | Worldwide ads” (@dein_ads), 5,974 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dein_ads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.