Chance To Be A Rich
🦇 Про крипту, AI та нові можливості
Owner @NersBatman
Чат https://t.me/ctbarchat
YouTube https://youtube.com/@ctbarcrypto
Менеджер: @posudomoichik
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -10,006. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,061–65,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 22:21
53,562
-60
8 Nov 2026, 14:01
53,622
-152
7 Nov 2026, 10:59
53,774
-76
6 Nov 2026, 14:05
53,850
-90
5 Nov 2026, 13:58
53,940
-133
4 Nov 2026, 11:37
54,073
-27
3 Nov 2026, 12:35
54,100
-108
2 Nov 2026, 10:26
54,208
-117
1 Nov 2026, 06:46
54,325
-115
31 Oct 2026, 07:09
54,440
-136
30 Oct 2026, 09:17
54,576
-104
29 Oct 2026, 07:46
54,680
-123
28 Oct 2026, 06:10
54,803
-117
27 Oct 2026, 07:58
54,920
-78
26 Oct 2026, 04:36
54,998
-45
25 Oct 2026, 06:18
55,043
-113
24 Oct 2026, 03:46
55,156
-87
23 Oct 2026, 07:05
55,243
-108
22 Oct 2026, 06:49
55,351
-176
20 Oct 2026, 21:16
55,527
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.69%
avg views ÷ 53,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
908
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
38 (5 May 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
6,354
Reactions total
177
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 23:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,660
Videos
≈294
Links
≈2,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,308 reactions across 36 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
390
29.8%
👍
271
20.7%
🔥
203
15.5%
🎉
124
9.48%
👏
109
8.33%
😍
50
3.82%
💯
48
3.67%
❤🔥
43
3.29%
🥰
33
2.52%
🤩
27
2.06%
👎
3
0.229%
🤬
3
0.229%
🕊
1
0.076%
🤔
1
0.076%
🤝
1
0.076%
🫡
1
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 36 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ctbarcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Добрий ранок друзі!👋
Розповідайте, хто що зараз робить по проєктах, що є цікавого та актуального? Де наш notcoin? 😂😂😂 Дійсно цікаві були часи і було що робити 😄
Зараз поки по проєктах майже нічого не роблю, ті два бота про котрі писав нещодавно + як і раніше вже по звичці Storm Trade + їх амбасадорка
А ви що робите?))
Всім вам бажаю гарного та спокійного дня! 😠❤️
Друзі всім привіт!
Бажаю всім гарної пʼятниці та заздалегідь гарних вихідних! 😠❤️
Завтра у нас в чаті робимо «болталку», поспілкуємось про все, про життя, про крипту, давно у нас не було такого формату! 🙃
В гості до нас завітає крипто гуру сучасності @Mark_PR0_BR0 🥳
Тому, у кого буде час та бажання провести цей вечір разом, всіх чекаємо в нашому чаті завтра о 20:00!
Добрий ранок друзі! Всім бажаю гарного та спокійного дня! В суботу зробимо аму в чаті у нас (дуже давно вже не було), як в старі добрі часи)) В гості до нас завітає @Mark_PR0_BR0, поспілкуємось про життя та про крипту! Завтра зробимо анонс! 😠❤️
🆕 Два нові цікаві Telegram-боти, на які варто звернути увагу!
⭐ https://t.me/GramBux_bot?start=ref461493436
Тут можна легко збирати Telegram Stars ⭐️ та виводити їх або обмінювати на трафік для просування власного каналу.
🎁 https://t.me/RaccoonGiftDropBot?start=ref461493436
Безкоштовний розіграш NFT-подарунка! 🔥
Також працює реферальна програма, де можна отримувати GRAM, накопичувати бали та підійматися в таблиці …
Друзі вітаю всіх!
Давно мене не було 🙃
Сподіваюсь у вас у всіх все добре!
Не прості зараз часи… але сподіваюсь і вірю що все буде добре! 🙏❤️
Насправді немає і часу і бажання зараз і енергії повноцінно продовжувати вести канал…
З проєктів нового нічого не роблю, все також як і було🔄
Storm Trade - вже по звичці роблю, виконую таски + накопичую XP
Коли є вільний час захожу і граю в драконів, можливо там буде щось ц…
🦇 Добрий день, друзі!
Давно нічого не писав на каналі. Зараз вистачає своїх справ та різних нюансів, тому часу бути тут так активно, як хотілося б, трохи менше.
Але я нікуди не зник 😄 Постійно читаю наш чат, слідкую за тим, що відбувається, і буду намагатися частіше з’являтися на каналі та у нас в чаті!
Тож коротко пройдемося по тому, що зараз актуально 👇
🦇 Binibit
Напевно, один із проектів, який зараз подобаєть…
PolyGate — короткий підсумок майже за тиждень ⬇️
Проєкт подобається. Нарахування приходять щодня — суми різні, приблизно від $3–4 до $10 на добу при депозиті $1000.
Вивід перевіряв уже декілька разів — працює дуже швидко, кошти приходять буквально за кілька хвилин.
На цьому етапі все працює стабільно: щоденні нарахування є, з виводами жодних проблем не було. Продовжую тестувати та спостерігати за проєктом далі 👀
…
Всім привіт 👋
Готуємось до вихідних, тому коротко підсумую тиждень по проектах, за якими зараз слідкую 👇
🦇 PolyGate
Новий для нас проект. Поки все подобається: % нараховується, проект працює, вивід перевірив — приходить швидко.
Продовжую тестувати та детальніше вивчати. На цьому етапі все працює нормально 👍
🦇 Binibit
Як і писав раніше — проект мені подобається.
З моменту моєї першої публікації токен уже дав при…
❤8👏5🔥4👍3🎉2😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @ctbarcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇺🇦PRO TRON NEWS🇺🇦 @Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 35,807 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto-Крипта |News|Prop-Trading|Crypto projects️ @cryptonews_nft2023 · 40,053 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
JDM Crypto @jdm_crypto1 · 49,004 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Влад | КриптоСамец @cryptosamec · 18,100 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
CRYPTEP @cryptep · 54,691 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
FOX & TOKENS @fox_buy · 47,347 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Арбузер @arbuzvcryptee · 22,000 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
ИИ #АнтиЗарплата @antizarplata · 72,379 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Trader UA 🇺🇦 @trader_ua1 · 306,559 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
🤑ALEKSEY PAS - Crypto Investor @krm_crypto · 177,554 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
ФАНТОМ ПОЗНАЕТ КРИПТУ👻 @CryptoFantomDrop · 305,640 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Владиславский 🌌 @vladiiiiken · 194,402 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
Про Деньги | Финансы @prodengi · 320,464 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Ledger Media l Крипта и блокчейн @Ledger_Media · 92,108 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto Sharks: The Deep Dive @crypto_shrks · 88,398 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Digitality / Диджиталити @digitality · 185,229 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
ЧП | НОВОСТИ РОССИИ @pig_in_crypto · 68,544 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
Slonya Ra (ton arc) @slonyaraton · 92,642 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Где деньги Криптовски @kriptovsky_drop · 131,256 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Broke @BrokeinCrpt · 90,466 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
🦉Інвестиції з Olexandr Pugach🦉 @olexandrpugach · 19,990 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 September 2026
Palantir @Palantir_116 · 66,386 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Shad | Лудка | АЗАРТ | СТАВКИ НА СПОРТ @gambshad · 50,301 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
CRYPTO PUNK🪁 @C_R_Y_P_T_O_P_U_N_K · 487,019 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🦇CTBAR🦇” (@ctbarcrypto), 53,562 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctbarcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.