You don’t need more screen time. You need better infrastructure. Markets move 24/7. Spreads open and close. Prices shift across platforms. Most opportunities are gone before you even see them. PolyGate is built to handle that part for you. • Polymarket Arbitrage • Cross-Exchange Arbitrage • automated execution • 24/7 monitoring While you’re offline, the market is still moving. And every day your capital sits idl…

Channel
PolyGate AI
@PolyGate_News
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
9,576subscribers
+208 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003169473400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PolyGate_News |
| Description | PolyGate is an AI trading system for Polymarket with up to 1% daily returns. Links: link3.to/XX5YX21V Support: @PolyGate_Client_Support Chat EN: @PolyGate_chat Chat CIS: @PolyGate_CIS Reviews EN: @reviews_polygate_en Reviews CIS: @reviews_polygate |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PolyGate_News |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:39 | 9,576 | +75 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 9,501 | +90 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:21 | 9,411 | +10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 9,401 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 9,396 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 9,409 | +51 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 9,358 | +91 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 9,267 | -11 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:31 | 9,278 | +30 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 9,248 | +254 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 8,994 | +28 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 8,966 | -97 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 9,063 | -110 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 9,173 | -111 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 9,284 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 9,309 | +26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 9,283 | +55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 9,228 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 9,224 | +68 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 9,156 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.6%
- avg views ÷ 9,576 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,830
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.252%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (25 June 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,156 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 22:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 52
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 49s
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,193 reactions across 45 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 482 | 40.4% | |
| 💯 | 171 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 170 | 14.2% | |
| 🙏 | 126 | 10.6% | |
| 🐳 | 116 | 9.72% | |
| 👌 | 66 | 5.53% | |
| 🕊 | 53 | 4.44% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 0.754% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
$12,000 deposited on October 1. By October 27, this PolyGate position had already generated around: +$1,903 in 26 days No manual trading. No constant market watching. The strategy kept working automatically in the background. October isn’t over yet. Someone entered at the beginning of the month and is already sitting on almost $2K in additional profit. October is almost over. Your capital can still spend the re…
🔥5💯4🥰4🙏1
Same pool. Different return. Check your Boost. Your base return isn’t always the final number. PolyGate Boosts can increase the profit you earn from the Polymarket Arbitrage Pool. The important part: Boosts are personal. Your percentage, minimum balance, and duration can be different from someone else’s. For new users, there’s currently a +15% starter Boost available. How it works • activate your Boost • keep th…
🥰5
Prediction markets are heating up. PolyGate is already live. 🔥 You don’t need to wait for the trend to become obvious. Right now, PolyGate gives you access to two live strategies: • Polymarket Arbitrage • Cross-Exchange Arbitrage Both are automated. Both are already putting capital to work. And as more money enters prediction markets, the best inefficiencies won’t stay untouched forever. The earlier you’re in, …
🔥7💯4
One event. Three markets. Three different prices. Polymarket, Kalshi, and Limitless can price the same outcome differently at the same time. That gap is where our Cross-Exchange Arbitrage agents work. • Same event. • Different prices. • One opportunity. Our agents monitor all three markets 24/7 and act when the spread appears. You don’t need to watch three screens and wait for the right moment. That’s what auto…
🔥5
The pools are filling. And that’s the point. More capital is entering both PolyGate pools, which means the remaining capacity keeps getting smaller. ❓ What we’re seeing • More users joining • More capital staying in the ecosystem • Higher utilization across both pools ❓ What it tells us People aren’t just trying the product. They’re staying, scaling their positions, and trusting PolyGate with more capital. ❓ What…
🔥6👌2
September closed at +22.43%. If you had put $10,000 to work at the start of the month, that would have been roughly: $10,000 → +$2,243 → $12,243 Now October is already underway, and PolyGate gives you more than one way to put capital to work: • Polymarket Arbitrage - automated strategies running 24/7 • Cross-Exchange Arbitrage - capturing price discrepancies across Polymarket, Kalshi, and Limitless The point isn…
🔥9🙏7🐳4👌4
⚡️ Every new deposit leaves less of the $500K pool available. Cross-Exchange Arbitrage is already live across Polymarket, Kalshi, and Limitless. 7 days → +5.6% 30 days → +33% 90 days → +126% 180 days → +306% Start from $10. Your rate is locked in when you enter. The pool has a fixed $500,000 capacity. Once it’s filled, new entries close. If you want in, don’t wait for “later.” Later may simply mean no capacity l…
🔥14⚡4🐳4👌4🕊3
Four months in. From zero to a working ecosystem. 🚀 Here’s what’s already live: • AI-powered Polymarket strategies with returns of up to 1% daily • Cross-Exchange Arbitrage across Polymarket, Kalshi, and Limitless • Trading Terminal for short-term BTC events • Up to 4x leverage • 24/7 automated strategies • Real-time profit tracking, Leaderboard, Boosts, and Genesis Points 💳 Crypto Cards are next, bringing everyda…
🔥13🙏7🐳4💯3🥰3
💰 What happens if you put $2,000 into the Cross-Exchange Arbitrage Pool? For the current 180-day term at +306%, the numbers look like this: $2,000 starting capital → +$6,120 potential profit → $8,120 by the end of the term $2,000 is just a reference amount. You can start from $10 and choose your own allocation. How it works • Cross-exchange arbitrage across Polymarket, Kalshi & Limitless • Locked-in rate from th…
👌14🔥5🥰4
🚀 PolyGate is launching a new product: Cross-Exchange Arbitrage. Now everyone has an opportunity to increase their returns using a strategy built around one of the most attractive market inefficiencies in the prediction market sector — price discrepancies between Kalshi, Limitless, and Polymarket. ⚡️ Act fast Due to the strategy’s high efficiency and significant profit potential, we’ve had to set a strict limit on …
🔥10💯4🙏3🕊2👌1
While some are still watching, others are already climbing the PolyGate leaderboard. 🏆 We’ve launched the Leaderboard. You can now see who has generated the highest all-time profit on the platform and check where you rank among other users. Current top 3: #1 — +$31,060 #2 — +$22,549 #3 — +$20,525 PolyGate now has 5,420 investors and more than $1.06M under management. The rankings are already taking shape. The q…
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @PolyGate_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PolyGate_News edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 November 2026
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ratner_official · 44,14614 posts🦇CTBAR🦇
@ctbarcrypto · 53,56212 postsInstant-Monitor.com Official Channel
@InstantMonitorFeed · 9337 postsБогатей на диване 🛋
@bogateinadivane · 7,3875 postsVondo Earning
@vondoearning · 15,9533 postsSTEPICH × PULSE ECOSYSTEM 🔥
@crypto_dohod_pro · 1,0271 postHTF CHANNEL
@hoflthefuture · 4,7591 postSTEPICH × PULSE | PREDICTION MARKET
@kryptoprosto · 3,2121 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PolyGate AI” (@PolyGate_News), 9,576 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PolyGate_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.