Channel
@nolito_now
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,906subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001561162362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nolito_now |
| Created | 1 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nolito_now |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @nolito_m/11443 Oct 2025, 00:48 UTC | @nolito_now/863 · this entry3 Oct 2025, 00:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @nolito_m/114710 Nov 2025, 06:23 UTC | @nolito_now/866 · this entry10 Nov 2025, 06:23 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @nolito_now/867 · this entry16 Nov 2025, 11:51 UTC | @nolito_m/114816 Nov 2025, 11:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @nolito_now/870 · this entry8 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC | @nolito_m/11518 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @nolito_now/872 · this entry12 Feb 2026, 02:53 UTC | @nolito_m/115312 Feb 2026, 02:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @nolito_m/11558 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC | @nolito_now/874 · this entry8 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @nolito_m | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (19–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 September 2025 to 11 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @nolito_now — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 7,906 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 7,914 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 7,916 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 7,921 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,923 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 7,923 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Про иллюзии. И лицензии. Что самое важное для хорошего иллюзиониста? Отвлечь внимание аудитории, пока длинноногую ассистентку в ящике меняют на стаю голубей и – что важнее – до того, как ящик разрежут бензопилой. Цирк Трамп и Ко. не является исключением. Иллюзионист размахивает Патриотом перед аудиторией, аудитория следит, куда он указывает, а тем временем в ящик под названием “Проекты французско-британского сувере…
Про эксперимент Как работает современная большая промка™ в Европе? Там все помешались на lean manufacturing – “поджаром (бережливом) производстве”. Производство разбросано по технопаркам всей Европы, каждый делает только свой этап, грузит компонент на фуру, и логистическая компания везет его в следующий технопарк. Большая европейская компания превращается в конвейер размером почти с Австралию, где автобан заменяет…
Про гусей и ИИ Техас, берег залива. Вторая половина июня 2026. “Что может быть хуже Техаса?” – подумал Джон. “Техас, полный калифорнийцев”, – ответил дьяволенок где-то в глубинах его подкорки. Впрочем, техасцы техасцами, а вот кофе в калифорнийской колонии на берегу Мексиканского залива был отменным. Джон впервые услышал о проекте, когда он занимался моделированием русского ПВО для кампании 2023 года. По “счастлив…
Про сроки и сценарии Шел 4-й год вялого прокси-конфликта на границе. Россия, разогнав свой ВПК еще в 2023-м, медленно наступала вперед, используя как можно меньше сил и ресурсов. Европа, вставив руку в жопу Незламной по самые гланды, пыталась в то же самое, но разгон ВПК, милитаризация и наступление у нее получались как-то жопой. И, однажды войдя во вкус, что ресурс "украинцы" не ограничен, экономить их она так и не…
Про братство. И куплю-продажу. Ну ладно. Разберем эту чубатятину (есть бородятина, а это чубатятина) по пунктам. Главная обида первого эпизода: "криптохохол, которому в России не место". Ну что же. Я понимаю, что когда "срав пэс та бзделы гусы" – это базис шутливого называния, то некоторые концепции социальных взаимодействий будет даже не объяснить. Можно иметь любой взгляд на события. Вообще. Просто нужно все это …
Про колею. И павиана. 2023… 2024… 2025... Раз за разом. Сначала артподготовка в СМИ и соцсетях, потом “военные операции", рассчитанные на ее поддержку, потом героический контрнаступ и в конце — “не шмогла я, не шмогла (с)”. Нахрюк в Запорожье напополам с Крынками, Курская область, Купянск… Медийный фон — от “от этого танка бегут русские” в весеннем Youtube 2023 года до “русские не могу защитить своих союзников” в но…
Про островки и диалектику Тихо шифером шурша, крыша едет не спеша © Утренняя прогулка по русским каналам телеги. Телега бурлит. Дела на фронте? Нет. Дела в Заливе? Тоже нет. Повод для бурления — очередная идиотская инициатива чиновников, законодателей, РКН, ГОСТ и т.д. (ненужное зачеркнуть). Утренняя прогулка по британскому, американскому, французскому, немецкому (ненужное зачеркнуть) сегменту экстремистов вроде Т…
Про вероятность и доверительный интервал Джон поднял бокал с недопитой маргаритой. Луч заходящего солнца за окном упал в бокал и затейливо переломился в целую серию радуг и зайчиков. Последние недели в Вирджинии, позади более 20 лет нервотрепки в Конторе, впереди солнце, рыбалка, тишина и спокойствие – и такие же радуги и зайчики, отражающиеся от поверхности Карибского моря. 20 лет в Конторе. 20 лет, отданных, чтобы…
Про бубенчики Allons enfants de la Patrie... Голыми сиськами впееерёоод!!! Свобода ведёт народ на... А никуда она его не ведёт. И народ здесь ни при чем. На чем держится, а точнее держался ЕС? На двух имперских проектах – французском и немецком. Немцы строили Четвертый рейх кошельком. Там, где не успели гренадеры Вильгельма и танки австрийского художника, должны были успеть миролюбивые бюргеры из Continental, Deu…
Про переговоры в эпоху Art of PeaceDeal* * пишется как слышится Нормальные переговоры как в политике, так и в бизнесе: Стороны садятся и обсуждаются плюсы того, к чему они стремятся, и минусы, если та или иная часть не будет соблюдена. Обсуждаются пряники меры по соблюдению и кнут пени в случае, если одна из сторон не будет соблюдать. Предложение ложится на стол сильных мира сего, переговорщики получают дополнительн…
Про мобилки протеста Мы еще в апреле наванговали, что США вернутся к истокам и вместо давно приевшейся клоунады Цветных Революций будут использовать пару генералов или вице-презЭдентшу, купленную за чемоданчик зелени, и, если надо, кадетский корпус. Это сбылось, но сбылось и другое. Они также вытащили старые, испытанные и гораздо более агрессивные методички ЦРУ по дестабилизации правительств. Никаких чтений конститу…
С Новым 2026 годом, с Новым счастьем, с Новой… Войной??? Иногда нам просто не хочется ванговать – наши предсказания сбываются более чем в 90% случаев. Но ничего не поделаешь, на дворе Новый 2026 год, нам подарили новый пазл и мы попытаемся его сложить. Первый кусок – Чарли Кирк. Это точка невозврата. Было ли это убийство Кеннеди 2.0, с теми же интересантами, или нет – как-то неинтересно. Важен результат: отдел ЛС …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nolito_now. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 851,702 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nolito_now named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нолито!” (@nolito_now), 7,906 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nolito_now.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.