National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @msk_gde. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +508. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,001–34,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 12:38
34,610
+74
19 Sept 2026, 02:20
34,536
+54
16 Sept 2026, 15:57
34,482
-8
14 Sept 2026, 20:59
34,490
-9
13 Sept 2026, 10:02
34,499
-9
11 Sept 2026, 10:21
34,508
+95
8 Sept 2026, 14:18
34,413
-27
5 Sept 2026, 06:40
34,440
+12
3 Sept 2026, 10:19
34,428
+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:53
34,427
+13
1 Sept 2026, 03:46
34,414
-12
31 Aug 2026, 02:27
34,426
-23
30 Aug 2026, 05:16
34,449
-16
29 Aug 2026, 06:36
34,465
-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:23
34,469
+38
27 Aug 2026, 08:35
34,431
-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:33
34,434
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:34
34,439
+14
24 Aug 2026, 01:56
34,425
+76
22 Aug 2026, 07:57
34,349
first reading
Engagement
537 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 34,610 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,640
233 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
233
of 537 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
537 (5 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
1,546,183
Reactions total
32,318
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈19,300
Videos
≈10,600
Links
≈21,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 30m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 218 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
72,103 reactions across 527 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
16,888
23.4%
🤡
12,659
17.6%
🔥
10,377
14.4%
👍
9,091
12.6%
😁
8,519
11.8%
❤
4,032
5.59%
🕊
3,794
5.26%
😢
1,765
2.45%
💯
1,325
1.84%
😱
1,205
1.67%
🤯
1,057
1.47%
🤔
610
0.846%
👎
562
0.779%
🥰
219
0.304%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 537 of the 537 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73,278 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 537 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 537 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russia_gde. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 537 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.745%
4 of 537 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
4,120
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,230
over 533 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 537 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🗣🪖 «Шахеды», ракеты, снаряды, танки, винтовки. На Валдайском форуме Путин заявил, что Россия воюет только своим оружием, «не заметив» поставок из КНДР, Ирана и других стран
«В зоны конфликтов считается неприличным поставлять оружие. Мы, например, оружие ниоткуда не получаем, мы опираемся только на свой оборонно-промышленный комплекс», — заверил президент гостей международного форума, рассуждая о помощи Украине. Разо…
🔥Нефть и химия снова оказались в зоне внимания дронов
В Волгограде, предположительно, поражён НПЗ.
В Самарской области под ударом, вероятно, оказалась ЛВДС «Самара» — крупнейший нефтяной хаб России с 71 резервуаром и общей вместимостью около 1,6 млн м³.
Ещё одной предполагаемой целью в Волгоградской области стал химзавод «Каустик», производящий сырьё для российского ВПК.
🌍 Путин: рано или поздно всем придётся договариваться о мировом устройстве
Президент РФ заявил, что мир подошёл к решающему поворотному моменту, а масштаб происходящих перемен огромен.
По его словам, человечество пока не до конца осознало новые вызовы, а продолжение мировых конфликтов остаётся весьма вероятным.
Путин также заявил о снижении влияния Запада, рисках развития технологий и необходимости научиться жить …
🌫️ Над Краснозаводском поднялся большой столб дыма
В городе Московской области заметили крупное задымление.
В Краснозаводске находятся химический завод и Научно-исследовательский центр ракетно-космической отрасли.
Путин, кстати, как раз начал свое выступление.
Предложка | Подписаться
💀 Зюганов предупредил о «большой войне» — и сам не уверен, что Россия её выиграет
Геннадий Зюганов заявил, что Россия находится на пороге большой и затяжной войны, а Европа якобы готовится к возможному наступлению в 2029–2030 годах.
При этом лидер КПРФ признал серьёзную проблему: финансово-экономический потенциал противников России, по его оценке, примерно в 10 раз выше. Поэтому уверенности в победе у него нет.
Ко…
🤡 Оскорбил участников СВО — получил 10 тысяч штрафа
В Марий Эл 41-летнего Андрея Е. оштрафовали на 10 тысяч рублей за семиминутный ролик во «ВКонтакте», в котором он оскорблял военнослужащих и силовиков.
Мужчине вменили возбуждение ненависти к социальной группе. В суде он признал вину, поэтому отделался минимальным штрафом.
Десять тысяч за семь минут в интернете. Почасовая ставка свободы слова, видимо, установлена…
📈💸 Содержание Путина подорожало быстрее инфляции
В 2027 году на президента и его администрацию планируют потратить 36,786 млрд рублей — на 9% больше, чем закладывали год назад.
На зарплаты сотрудников уйдёт 21,833 млрд рублей, ещё 13,477 млрд — на товары и услуги.
Для сравнения: в бюджете на 2022 год на эти цели закладывали 14,7 млрд рублей.
За три года расходы на Путина и его аппарат должны составить почти 106 м…
Редко рекомендуем от себя, но тут такой случай, присмотритесь к каналу Не ТВ. Пишет интересно, с юмором, подкрепляет слова источниками.
Не будем вас призывать бездумно подписываться. Зайдите, посмотрите, вас будут рады видеть среди читателей.
Загляните в Не ТВ, посмотрите
❗️Путин сегодня выступит на «Валдае» с речью, которую «ждет весь мир», заявили в Кремле
Ну понесется, походу, по трубам то самое. Кто забыл печенегов? Вспоминаем!
Предложка | Подписаться
🚨⚡️ После удара по подстанции часть Крыма осталась без света и воды
Ночью был нанесён удар по подстанции «Нижнегорская» мощностью 50 МВА.
Без электричества остались районы Нижнегорского, Красногвардейского и Первомайского. В Армянске отключились свет и вода, Черноморское обесточено с полуночи.
«Крымэнерго» подтвердило беспилотную атаку на энергообъекты полуострова.
Предложка | Подписаться
👍35🔥15😢8🕊6❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 537 posts we hold for @russia_gde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@russia_gde edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#26
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ | Новости | Что делать? @mobilizationnews · 133,570 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Пацифист. Резерв @pacifist_rus · 178 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
ПОЛУАВТОБИЯ @poluavtobia · 55,238 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
Власть @vlasti1 · 280,921 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Илья Монарх. Elline и АрмииНет. @Monarch_Kredit · 51,174 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
НЕ ЖДИ хорошие новости @ne_zhdi_novosti · 98,515 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Питер против войны @spb_gde · 39,057 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
ШАРФ🧣 @SHARFVA · 20,028 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Легалайз @legalayz_live · 20,595 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Война близко @warblizko · 30,031 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
ДСО — Движение сознательных отказчиков @stoparmy · 56,381 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Неверный путь @nevernyyput · 50,401 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Москва против войны @msk_gde · 37,214 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
FTP @ru_FTP · 86,847 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Политический Цирк @PolitCircus · 100,802 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Реальная журналистика @realjournal · 19,850 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Глобальный кризис @global_crysis · 21,837 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
День опричника @oprichniksday · 33,997 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
Идите лесом! @iditelesom_help · 161,914 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
MrRissso @mrrissso63 · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Антон Хардин @anton_hardin_actual · 138,400 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Полит Юмор @polit1humor · 24,570 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
LIBERTY PEOPLE @libertypeople · 97,374 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
НАРОДНАЯ ТРИБУНА @narodnaya_tri_buna · 32,793 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Россия против войны” (@russia_gde), 34,610 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russia_gde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
