Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RI-ESISTENZA

Channel

RI-ESISTENZA

@ri_esistenza

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,585subscribers

-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001713844634
TypeChannel
Username@ri_esistenza
Created17 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ri_esistenza

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,5859,6909,637.56 August 2026 — 9,690 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,690 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,686 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,674 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,677 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,666 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,655 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,637 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,633 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,632 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,621 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,610 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,598 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,596 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,585 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,569–9,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:409,585-11
14 Sept 2026, 03:419,596-2
10 Sept 2026, 03:589,598-12
4 Sept 2026, 23:599,610-11
31 Aug 2026, 20:369,621-11
29 Aug 2026, 01:589,632-1
25 Aug 2026, 19:519,633-4
23 Aug 2026, 04:459,637-18
19 Aug 2026, 20:179,655-11
16 Aug 2026, 17:179,666-11
12 Aug 2026, 20:569,677+3
9 Aug 2026, 20:219,674-12
7 Aug 2026, 01:489,686-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,690no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:599,690first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 22 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.52%
avg views ÷ 9,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
625
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held45 (22 February 202628 August 2026)
Views total625
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

777 reactions across 40 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍28536.7%
14518.7%
👏12115.6%
💩719.14%
🤡597.59%
👌384.89%
🤮141.80%
🎉101.29%
👀81.03%
👎70.901%
60.772%
🤔50.644%
🔥30.386%
😁20.257%
😨20.257%
❤‍🔥10.129%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 777 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC625 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnews/2026/08/27/la-benzina-del-sindaco-facciamo-prezzi-bassi-e-senza-utili_b7c2ebfc-d4f3-4635-a75a-f1c750a00a9a.html

👏18

24 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,070 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Messaggio da COMILVA alle Famiglie che ci seguono Data la recente strumentalizzazione sulla dolorosa vicenda di Palermo, desideriamo ricordarvi che l’Obiezione Attiva non finisce con l’iscrizione a scuola e che non si tratta di un mero "escamotage", come riportato in alcune cronache strumentali a stigmatizzare il comportamento dei genitori obiettori. L'Obiezione è e rimane un percorso di responsabilità genitoriale

👏455🤡2👍1

24 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,290 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

A Palermo è morta una bambina di quattro anni. Tra le ipotesi diagnostiche è stata indicata la difterite, ma gli accertamenti non sono ancora conclusi. La difterite respiratoria classica è oggi eccezionalmente rara in Italia. Proprio questa rarità pone domande cliniche e organizzative concrete: Quando è stata sospettata? È stata richiesta l’antitossina difterica DAT? Dove era disponibile e quanto tempo sarebbe serv

13👍8🤡2🎉1

21 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,370 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Capite che gli immigrati sono solo uno strumento politico, non importa che siano delle persone. 🤔 Ma Sanchez è di centro sinistra se non sbagliamo La sinistra che si preoccupa del piú debole, quella che ci vede tutti sullo stesso piano....

👍1863

21 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 29 August 2026

Sahara Occidentale, la svolta di Sánchez: «Marocco sovrano» | il manifesto https://ilmanifesto.it/sahara-occidentale-la-svolta-di-sanchez-marocco-sovrano

21 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Capite perché Sanchez stá tutto tranquillo in vacanza?

👍5

21 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,450 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Accordi di Abramo, il ruolo del Marocco e di Israele – Rivista Africa https://www.africarivista.it/accordi-di-abramo-il-ruolo-del-marocco-e-di-israele/194556/?srsltid=AfmBOopq8IaMwXWdZmLlmr16yHLBOElfLxfeAH-rV3q-caSWso2AszfU

👍3

21 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC978 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

E ora concludiamo questo reportage con un gran finale, che non ha bisogno di ulteriori spiegazioni.....

👏8

21 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Fronte Polisario - Wikipedia https://share.google/2PP4zZwnNWeYaNepA

🤡1

21 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC794 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

La crisi nacque da uno scontro diplomatico tra Madrid e Rabat. La Spagna aveva ospitato in segreto per cure mediche Brahim Ghali, leader del Fronte Polisario (movimento che lotta per l'indipendenza del Sahara Occidentale, territorio rivendicato dal Marocco). Per ritorsione, la polizia di frontiera marocchina allentò deliberatamente i controlli, permettendo il passaggio di massa di migliaia di giovani e minori verso

👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @ri_esistenza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Canale Comitato Fortitudo
@comitatofortitudo · 52,492
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗢 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗢
@consenso_disinformato · 54,612
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Dr. Roberto Petrella 3317784249
@RobertoPetrella · 21,528
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 September 2026
Protocolli CDS
@protocolliCDS · 42,240
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
CORVELVA
@corvelva1993 · 37,257
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
La nuova normalità
@lanuovanormalita · 34,829
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Guerrieri per la libertà
@guerrieriperlaliberta · 45,681
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
BECCIOLINI NETWORK Informazione libera
@canaleFAHRENHEIT912 · 22,155
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Sir Red Ronnie
@RedRonnieTv · 32,905
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
Gianluigi Paragone
@gianluigi_paragone · 46,356
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
ZAINZ 🐺 Canale Ufficiale ZainzTv
@zainztv · 51,505
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RI-ESISTENZA” (@ri_esistenza), 9,585 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ri_esistenza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.