Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 63 days, net +2,217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,338–33,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 18:36
32,990
-84
5 Oct 2026, 14:55
33,074
-112
30 Sept 2026, 00:55
33,186
-273
18 Sept 2026, 03:41
33,459
+83
15 Sept 2026, 22:40
33,376
-21
14 Sept 2026, 08:58
33,397
-16
12 Sept 2026, 17:41
33,413
-2
10 Sept 2026, 16:21
33,415
-13
7 Sept 2026, 14:40
33,428
-25
4 Sept 2026, 16:38
33,453
+118
3 Sept 2026, 01:35
33,335
+100
1 Sept 2026, 23:46
33,235
-19
1 Sept 2026, 00:18
33,254
+44
31 Aug 2026, 02:47
33,210
+10
30 Aug 2026, 03:33
33,200
+35
29 Aug 2026, 04:45
33,165
+135
28 Aug 2026, 01:28
33,030
-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:27
33,037
+22
26 Aug 2026, 02:05
33,015
+40
25 Aug 2026, 05:17
32,975
first reading
Engagement
232 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 32,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,010
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 232 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
232 (5 August 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
715,240
Reactions total
8,340
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,790
Videos
≈51
Links
≈1,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,052 reactions across 232 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16,336
81.5%
👏
1,362
6.79%
🙏
797
3.97%
👌
639
3.19%
🔥
471
2.35%
🥰
161
0.803%
✍
44
0.219%
🎉
43
0.214%
🤝
29
0.145%
💯
27
0.135%
⚡
21
0.105%
👨💻
21
0.105%
❤🔥
18
0.09%
💋
17
0.085%
🫡
17
0.085%
🕊
16
0.08%
😎
16
0.08%
😇
8
0.04%
🆒
3
0.015%
😍
3
0.015%
2 further kinds
3
0.015%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
112
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 232 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MERTERZORLU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 232 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Gümüş
gümüş tarafında ara noktadan tepki aldık. 61 üzerinde kapanış yaparsak biraz daha rahatlarız ancak 63.5 üzerine atmadıkça gümüş tarafı halen riskli.
global tarafta genel olarak bir toparlanma var kripto amerika emtialar olsun dün ki sert düşüş sonrası bu gayet normal.
direnç üstü kapanışlar yapana kadar halen riskli bölgedeyiz.
halen düşüş ihtimalimiz var.
lütfen dikkatli ilerleyelim fomo'ya kapılmayalım.
…
Altın
altın tarafında dönüş almaya çalışıyoruz tıpkı 2 gün önce olduğu gibi.
4260 üzerine atmadıkça ben aksiyon almayacağım dönüş için 4260 üzeri kalıcılık lazım o zaman dönüş oldu derim.
Ben elimdekilere devam ediyorum yeni alım ya da satım da bulunmuyorum anlık olarak 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Rabbim bol bereketli bir cuma günü nasip etsin 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Borsa İstanbul
bist tarafında henüz net bir dönüş yapmış değiliz 12.600 seviyesini geçebilirsek ana endeks de o zaman pozitif konuşmaya başlarız.
şu anda ufak tepkiler alıyoruz elbette ama kalıcılık sağlayamıyoruz.
11.600 aşağıda ki ana desteğimiz şu anda planlar arasında olması gereken bir seviye.
Çok fazla soru geliyor fon olaylarından sonra güven bitti bist için her şey bitti.
Arkadaşlar bu tarz durumlar hep …
Hazine ve Maliye Bakanı Mehmet Şimşek, soruşturma kapsamındaki 17 fonun tasfiye sürecinin tamamlandığını ve 43 bin yatırımcının parasının bugün itibarıyla bankalara transfer edildiğini açıkladı.
A1 Capital, Bulls ve Pardus'ün fonlarında ödeme yapıldı diğer fonların ödemesi net değil şu anda
Gümüş
ne yazık ki gümüş tarafı güzel değil satış sürüyor.
elimdeki emtialardan bir miktar daha stop oluyorum.
Nakit oranımı artırmak istiyorum destek kırıldığı için.
tekrardan 61 üzerine atana kadar biraz nakitte bekleyeceğim.
ne yazık ki gümüş tarafı başta olmak üzere şu anda dönüşler yaşamıyoruz emtialar tarafında.
57 seviyesi ise aşağıda bizi bekleyen ana destek. bugün 15.30 da verilerimiz var bu veriler ile…
Gümüş
emtialarda ne yazık ki satış yiyiyoruz kapanışımız böyle olursa ne yazık ki 57 seviyesi bizim için artık ihtimal olmaktan çıkar
bir miktar stop oluyorum ve elimdekileri %70'e çekiyorum. bu bittik öldük battık değil önlem satışı elimdeki nakiti artırmak için.
elimde halen fazlaca varlık var onlara devam ediyorum
Altın
temelde bir değişiklik yok altın tarafında. yükseldiğimiz az bir kısmı geri verdik.
Şu anda piyasada tat yok. son 10 gündür birebir aynı hareketleri sergiliyoruz.
Destek ya da direnç noktaları geçilmedikçe yani 4110 altına ya da 4260 üstüne atmadıkça bu durum değişmeyecek.
yatay alandayız ne zaman bu seviyeler geçilir o zaman yeni bir hareket başlar. şu anda emtialar tarafında yeni bir aksiyonumuz yok
❤64👌7🔥3
Signed Enes İlhan ⛩
Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @MERTERZORLU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MERTERZORLU edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Coin Mühendisi Analiz 💯 @coinmuhendisianaliz · 29,066 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Bilgi Bilek Büker TUS Paylaşım Grubu @bbbdahiliye · 24,391 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MERTER ZORLU ANALİZ” (@MERTERZORLU), 32,990 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MERTERZORLU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
