Channel
@coach_hadeel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,945subscribers
-486 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001074708641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coach_hadeel |
| Description | استطيع ان ارى بوضوح الان 🔢🔠 انستجرام : https://www.instagram.com/coach1hadeel8/ 🎶 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coach_hadeel |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 21,945 | -50 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 21,995 | -21 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 22,016 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 22,029 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 22,042 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 22,058 | -29 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 22,087 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 22,113 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 22,133 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:24 | 22,148 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:25 | 22,158 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 22,175 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 22,187 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 22,194 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 22,205 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 22,209 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 22,220 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 22,232 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 22,243 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 22,254 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (16 February 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,050 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
ساعات قليله تفصلنا عن امسية ( ترددك الأعلى ) المجانية بشارككم في هذه الأمسية طاقتك وتردداتك اللي خلقت فيها، أكثر تردد يشبهك ويحيط بك باستمرار، والسلوكيات اللي تعبر عنه. وبما إنه الترددات غير ثابتة، بحالة ارتفاع وانخفاض، بنشير إلى الجهتين: كيف يبدو الأمر لما تنخفض تردداتك؟ وكيف لما تعلو؟ أحياناً مايكون واضح. أحياناً تعتقد إنه هذا طبيعي لكن لا . ربما تعتقد إنه عادي يكون عندك شوي إيجو مثلاً، لكن أنت بالذات، أنت بال…
ارشادات لك حسب رقم انجازك 👇 https://t.me/coachHadeel111/660
المعتقدات بالجسد مش بالعقل وكل محاولات تفكيكها من العقل تعتبر عبث https://t.me/coachHadeel111/557
الحظ توفيق من الله ولكن على اي اساس https://t.me/coachHadeel111/526
https://luckflow.life
ماهي ترددات الحظ ؟ بعض الناس يتولدو فيها وبعضهم يصنعوها https://t.me/coachHadeel111/498
هل قراءة طاقات الارقام يعتبر تنبؤ وحصر للاحتمالات اللامحدودة ؟ https://t.me/coachHadeel111/424
👇👇👇 https://t.me/coachHadeel111/371
العجيب حسب تجربتي الشخصية وتجارب المحيطين حولي وبعد مراقبة طويلة لسنوات اقدر اقول نعم الجهاز العصبي يعمل بطريقة ما مع طاقة الرقم. في الحقيقة، الفكرة مش 'طاقة الرقم' بحد ذاته، إنما الرقم هو اللي يقرأ الطاقة المحيطة فيك مثلا : إذا كنت في شهر رقم (2)، فإن جهازك العصبي يستنزف ويرهق من العمل، لكن إذا كنت في شهر رقم (4)، فإنه يرهق من الاسترخاء، والعمل هو اللي ينعشك! ما أعرف كيف، لكن يا جماعة الأمر حقيقي ويعمل.. اختب…
تمرين اكتمال القمر الجماعي 👇 https://t.me/coachHadeel111/313
الليلة موعدنا مع أمسية الوعي الجسدي: " تفكيك صدمات الجسد" موعدنا الساعة 6:45 بتوقيت السعودية رابط الزوم سيرسل الى هذه القناة https://t.me/coachHadeel111 في هذه الأمسية، سنغير المفاهيم التقليدية عن التشافي ، سننتقل من محاولة "إقناع العقل" إلى "تحرير الجسد". سنناقش كيف تتخزن الصدمة في أنسجتك وأعصابك وليس في ذاكرتك فقط ما هي الحالات الأربعة التي يدخل فيها جهازك العصبي؟ وكيف تعرف في أي حالة أنت الآن؟ وكيف نفكك "حال…
👇 اشياء فهمتها بعد العمل على الجهاز العصبي https://www.instagram.com/p/DXE9DaYisfQ/?igsh=d3p5YXIzNWd3aWlr
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @coach_hadeel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coach Hadeel” (@coach_hadeel), 21,945 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coach_hadeel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.