Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تعويذة | مساحة آمنة

@i6jn8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,082subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306030803
TypeChannel
Username@i6jn8
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/i6jn8

Growth

9,0779,0829,079.59 August 2026 — 9,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,077 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,082 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,076–9,083 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:279,082+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:419,077-3
9 Aug 2026, 07:309,080first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 9,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total20,992
Reactions total393
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43588.2%
💘204.06%
🙏132.64%
😍102.03%
🍓51.01%
👍51.01%
👏20.406%
💯20.406%
💋10.203%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @i6jn8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC622 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مساء الخير والرضا احبتي الاصدقاء بالمنطقة الشرقية رح تُقام جلسات وقوف عائلي حضورية مع احدى المدربات البارعات بالمجال للمهتمين كلموني واتساب ارسلكم التفاصيل : https://wa.me/message/JTBBFYWOA2MKM1

14

Signed .

31 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,620 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

التأنيب كمرحلة في الحياة .. قد يقيد ويجعلك في وضع الهارب دون وعي منك .. اذا كنت شخصية رائعة في مجال ما .. ولديك قدر من الابداع لكن تهرب من ان يكون حقيقي و مستمر وكبير .. اسأل نفسك على ماذا تؤنب ذاتك ؟

38

Signed .

31 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,520 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

صباح الخير والسعة للجميع يارب العالمين . كيف ممكن اكون في يومي متّصله ومرتبطة بأسباب السعة والانشراح ؟ 💕

46

Signed .

25 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈2,000 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مساء الخير حضرتوا الجلسة الثانية ؟👀

12👏2💯2

Signed .

23 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,870 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

الجزء الثاني من سلسلة التأنيب جلسة استكشاف واعتراف وتسليم الكوخ رمزية لمشاعرك اتجاه ذاتك رمزية كل صندوق ولونه وثقله تُظهر لك مقدار تأثير هذا الجرح على حياتك ومدى ثقله في نفسك وعلاقتك بذاتك

31🍓5💘3💋1

Signed .

23 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,490 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مرحبا رح اقدم هالجلسة الان لان ماقدر في وقت اخر للاسف وحابه تكون اليوم مثل ماوعدتكم ✨ موجودين ؟

22

Signed .

22 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,450 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مرحبا احبتي غداً موعدنا للجلسة الثانية لتحرير طبقات التأنيب ( حياة الجزء الثاني) 💕 الجلسة مجانية تماماً وحصرية في قناتي .. لو ماحضرت للان الجلسة السابقة يفضل تحضرها ✨ واكتبوا لي افضل وقت يناسبكم للغد

45💘5

Signed .

19 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,540 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedestination369Video

ارشاد ١٩ جولاي ٢٠٢٦ هذا الوقت تحتاج إلى استرجاع جزيئات روحك المفقودة كأولوية مهمه جدا في حياتك.. الكارت يدعوك إلى وضع حدود بدون دخول اي معارك تستنزف جزيئات روحك من جديد … حافظ على نبرة صوت عادئة وعميقة .. نفذ قرار واحد يضمن لك حدود صحية كل يوم وسجل في دفتر هذه التفاصيل … لاحظ تقدمك على مدى الايام .. ذكر جهازك العصبي انه من الامن والممكن والمسموح لك انك تحظى بمساحة خاصه فيك حتى لو كانت ركن بسيط منظم في البيت دون الحا

54💘8👍5

Signed .

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @i6jn8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أ/ نوف لغة انجليزية ✨🤍
@NF_English1N · 503,063
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تعويذة | مساحة آمنة” (@i6jn8), 9,082 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i6jn8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.