Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maha ✨

Channel

Maha ✨

@sooesulsuL7777

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,099subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546156016
TypeChannel
Username@sooesulsuL7777
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sooesulsuL7777

Growth

2,0962,0992,097.517 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 2,096 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 10:15 — 2,096 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 21:56 — 2,099 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 10:0017 Aug 2026, 21:56
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,096–2,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 21:562,099+3
17 Aug 2026, 10:152,096no change
17 Aug 2026, 10:002,096first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 2,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
596
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total10,721
Reactions total664
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

664 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50275.6%
👌456.78%
👏223.31%
192.86%
🐳91.36%
🙏91.36%
🔥81.20%
71.05%
🤷‍♀71.05%
💯60.904%
🆒40.602%
😐40.602%
🤔40.602%
🥰40.602%
😢30.452%
🤩30.452%
🦄30.452%
🙉20.301%
🤯20.301%
💊10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 664reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC172 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026

اذا كان فيه واصلين لأهدافهم بأقل امكانياتهم سؤال / ليش انت ما وصلت ؟ طيب ليش انت ما وصلت الى اقصى درجة من امكانياتك في المال او الصحة او الهدف اللي تطلبه ؟

17💯62💊1🤷‍♀1

14 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC291 views57 reactionsread 17 August 2026

ورد الشهر سورة القمر و سورة الشمس النية تطهير الظاهر و الباطن من كل نية سوء وتنقية الهرمونات و اعادة ضبطها كما خلقها الله في أحسن صورة

46🐳4🦄3🥰2🙏1🆒1

10 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC528 views53 reactionsread 17 August 2026

سوء العلاقات هو سوء مع نفسك قلة العلاقات هو هجر لذاتك انقطاع العلاقات هو رفضك لذاتك فكم من المواجهات تتطلب مع ذاتك ؟

45😐42🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC503 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026

هل تجرؤ على الاعتراف ؟

24🤷‍♀3

10 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC484 views31 reactionsread 17 August 2026

حقيقة هل تؤمن أن خطأك يستحق المسامحة ؟

27👌2🤯2

9 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC490 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026

(ولا يحيطون بشيء من علمه الا بما شاء) (و فوق كلُ ذي علمٍ عليم ) ماهي قدرة الله هنا استخدموها مع تعلم شي صعب عليكم او مع شي مخفي عنكم

43🙏4🐳3👌31

9 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC463 views52 reactionsread 17 August 2026

كيف لي أن اكون محاطة بقدرة الله عز وجل في جميع جوانب حياتي وماهي الاحاطة الالهية التي تحيط بي وبكافة جوانب حياتي والتي من شأنها ان تجعلني آمنة مطمئنة يأتيها رزقها حيث تشاء وأي شي يمنع ذلك ويعكر ذلك أسأل الله ان يزيله بلطف و أمان

416🙏3🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC545 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026

لدي القدرة الكاملة على خلق مساري الخاص وتغيير واقعي

44👏3🤩3🐳2🔥1🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC692 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026

كم عدد القناعات الخفية التي تجعلك تربط بين الغنى وبين التعب الشديد أو فقدان الأمان

32🤷‍♀3

4 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC657 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

مكالمة من أنتِ مع قدراتك هل مازلتِ تستخدمين نسخة النمط القديم توضيحات الوفرة الغنى الثقة الظهور وأكثر مكالمة تابعة لبرنامج امرأة جديدة يوم الجمعة 7 اغسطس buymeacoffee.com/mahasoul/e/551171

13🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sooesulsuL7777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ايمان بنت سعود
@emansou6 · 129,099
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
مريم دخيل 💰
@mariamaldakhil · 92,175
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maha ✨” (@sooesulsuL7777), 2,099 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sooesulsuL7777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.