Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Arshia Type Shi

@unarshia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

181,508subscribers

-2,724 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002378293073
TypeChannel
Username@unarshia
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/unarshia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

181,508184,232182,8706 August 2026 — 184,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 184,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 184,217 subscribers7 August 2026 — 183,736 subscribers8 August 2026 — 183,259 subscribers9 August 2026 — 182,799 subscribers10 August 2026 — 182,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 181,937 subscribers12 August 2026 — 181,508 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,724. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181,099–184,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:44181,508-429
11 Aug 2026, 17:52181,937-395
10 Aug 2026, 15:44182,332-467
9 Aug 2026, 15:11182,799-460
8 Aug 2026, 16:12183,259-477
7 Aug 2026, 19:36183,736-481
6 Aug 2026, 18:20184,217-15
6 Aug 2026, 17:30184,232no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:18184,232first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 181,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
43,800
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held35 (19 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,533,260
Reactions total15,166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
94
Videos
11
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

15,166 reactions across 35 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔4,71331.1%
👍3,55823.5%
🤣2,55116.8%
👏9736.42%
🙏8425.55%
💘6134.04%
🥰5433.58%
❤‍🔥3882.56%
💯3092.04%
🤓2091.38%
😢1701.12%
👌1651.09%
👀340.224%
🤷‍♂330.218%
🐳320.211%
👨‍💻190.125%
🤩70.046%
🙈60.04%
👻10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 35 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @unarshia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈5,880 views361 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یک روزی اون‌قدر پولدار می‌شم و از زندگی پوریا آدرویت یک فیلم سینمایی می‌سازم.

🤣339👍14🥰8

11 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈4,720 views178 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

از رکبایی که خوردیم باید مستند ساخت.

👍164🤣9🐳5

10 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈5,420 views222 reactionsread 10 August 2026

جسارتا اسم شما دیجی حمیده؟ چون خیلی از کنترل خارجی

🤣218👌4

10 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈7,980 views270 reactionsread 10 August 2026

شما دالگ ایشوز دارید؟

🤣204👌55🤓11

9 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈12,000 views110 reactionsread 10 August 2026

کرینج‌ترین لاینی که تو موزیکای فارسی شنیدید رو کامنت کنید.

👍94🤣13💘3

9 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC≈16,500 views397 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏«تو اگه منو می‌خواستی» از «سیتیزن دل پاکتم من» هم «نمردم قوی‌تر شدم، یه ببر مست زخمی‌تر شدم» تره.

🤣385👍7💔5

9 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈7,270 views411 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

اقا چه بلایی داره سرمون می‌آد؟

💔287🤣121🙈3

8 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈23,200 views388 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯301🥰53👀34

8 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈5,230 views262 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

واقعا نمی‌دونم چی بگم.

💔260👍1🤷‍♂1

8 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈4,800 views215 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤓177❤‍🔥28👨‍💻10

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @unarshia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,724 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arshia Type Shi” (@unarshia), 181,508 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unarshia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.