Buildathon update! 🏆 175 finalists. Our biggest field yet, and it demands an in-depth judging process. Our judges are hard at work on the final round of evaluations. Winners announced soon.
🔥16❤1
Signed Henry | Casper

Channel
@casperofficialann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37,306subscribers
-283 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450318140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @casperofficialann |
| Description | Official Announcement Channel of the Casper Network overseen by the Casper Association |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/casperofficialann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 37,306 | -42 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 37,348 | -60 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 37,408 | -54 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 37,462 | -40 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 37,502 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 37,534 | -35 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 37,569 | -20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 37,589 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 37,589 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,792 |
| Reactions total | 213 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
416 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 300 | 72.1% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 16.8% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 4.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Buildathon update! 🏆 175 finalists. Our biggest field yet, and it demands an in-depth judging process. Our judges are hard at work on the final round of evaluations. Winners announced soon.
🔥16❤1
Signed Henry | Casper
Quantum computers will eventually break the cryptography behind crypto wallets. Everyone knows it. Almost nobody has done anything about it. We're partnering with AmericanFortress to protect every Casper account before that day. Article on CoinMarketCap
🔥30❤4
Signed Henry | Casper
The $CSPR trading challenges are live on Kraken The breakdown: • Spot challenge: 12,100,000 CSPR, ranked by volume. • Perp challenge: 3,800,000 CSPR, ranked by realised PnL. → pro.kraken.com/app/promos/tra… Enrol before trading. Ends 26 August, 23:59 UTC Terms and geographic restrictions apply. Official post on Kraken
🔥15❤4👏3
Signed Henry | Casper
Agents don't have bank accounts. They need a dollar that moves at machine speed and costs the same every time. That's csprUSD, upgraded for Casper 2.0 and x402 micropayments. Build with it today, ahead of mainnet. → Read more on Business Insider
🔥34❤2
Signed Henry | Casper
Fresh off $CSPR’s launch on Kraken, @michaelsteuer joins Mario Nawfal and Scott Melker live on Crypto_TownHall this Friday. RWAs, institutional adoption, the Clarity Act, and more. 🗓️ July 24 💬 Roundtable: 10:15 AM ET 🎙️ 1:1 interview: 11:00 AM ET Link coming soon.
🔥25❤1
Signed Henry | Casper
It's official. $CSPR is now live on Kraken ⚓️ The infrastructure layer for the machine economy and real-world assets, now on one of the most trusted names in crypto. Trade now
🔥29❤9👍3👏1
Signed Henry | Casper
Congratulations to our 175 Agentic Buildathon finalists! 175 working agentic projects, built on Casper in a few weeks, every one with a real path to Mainnet. This is what the machine economy looks like when builders show up. Proud of every team.
🔥17
Signed Henry | Casper
Institutional capital is increasingly turning toward regulated RWAs and machine-to-machine commerce. CoinMarketCap offers an in-depth analysis of why Casper is well positioned to drive this transition. Read the full article on CoinMarketCap
🔥19
Signed Henry | Casper
Casper and some of our friends in the industry did a thing. With AI Agents already accounting for the majority of internet traffic, Casper provides the rails on which agents transact autonomously, and with proper owner-directed control. Robots welcome 🤖 Tweet from Cointelegraph
🔥22❤3👍2
Signed Henry | Casper
21.07.26
🔥37❤1
Signed Henry | Casper
The Final Round of the Casper Agentic Buildathon opens today! We've got 254 projects and 570 builders competing for $150K. Proof that anyone can build on Casper's agentic rails. Thank you to our sponsors: Halborn Security, Allium Labs and NOWNodes
🔥14❤3
Signed Henry | Casper
Flexible staking for $CSPR is now live on Uphold - weekly rewards, zero lock-ups, withdraw whenever you want. Easiest way yet to put your CSPR to work. ⤵️ Original post
🔥13
Signed Henry | Casper
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @casperofficialann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 357,925 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Casper Official Announcements” (@casperofficialann), 37,306 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casperofficialann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.