💭Before you buy any token, there are only two questions that matter: "What's it worth?" "Can it rug me?" CoinMarketCap answers the first. We built the tool for the second😉🧵

Channel
De.Fi 2.0 Announcements
@defi_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18,035subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001168609546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @defi_ann |
| Description | Web3 Super App 👑 Backed by Consensys & OKX DeFi Antivirus 🛡 Chat for discussion: https://t.me/DeDotFi Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/DeFi Medium blog: https://de.fi/blog Website: https://De.Fi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/defi_ann |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 18,035 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 18,044 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 18,056 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 18,065 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 18,075 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 18,078 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 18,096 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 18,104 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 18,120 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 18,120 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.40%
- avg views ÷ 18,035 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 974
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (15 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,741 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,330
- Videos
- ≈186
- Links
- ≈2,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
The best yield isn't always on your favorite chain🤷 With support for 20+ chains and seamless tracking via http://De.Fi Bundles, you can monitor premium yield opportunities across different ecosystems - all while keeping your full portfolio in one view😉 What's your favorite chain for yield farming?🧑🌾🧺
🚨It’s time to change that old password you've been using for years As tech and AI get smarter, passwords that used to be safe can now be cracked in just two weeks Great breakdown from our security team🛡️👇
Summer's in full swing. So is De.Fi🌊 Someone has to catch the scams while you catch the sun😎⛱️
The days of spending hours manually auditing smart contracts are officially over🎉 We’ve compressed tonns of due diligence into a single click🚀 🧵Enter the De.Fi Scanner Advanced Tab (to protect your bags and save $)👇
🚨 The Q2 2026 REKT Report just dropped - and it's a wake-up call for everyone⏰ Crypto lost $764M across 67 exploits last quarter (the worst quarter since Q2 2025) This report is a blueprint for protecting your capital👇 https://de.fi/blog/rekt-report-q2-2026-764-million-lost-across-67-incidents
🚨Security intelligence is a competitive advantage The REKT Database gives you a complete view of the latest crypto exploits, helping you understand how attacks happen - and how to avoid them. ⚡ Real-Time Loss Tracking 🔍 Deep-Dive Smart Contract Autopsies 🛡️ 100% Free Web3 Intelligence Don't just react to hacks - learn from them. 🔗https://de.fi/rekt-database
🚨 Why are crypto exploits happening more often? Because the attack surface is no longer one contract In this thread our CTO, Artem, explains why security has moved up the stack👇
Today’s stablecoin menu is live🍽️ But De.Fi Explore doesn’t just show APYs It gives you the context too: protocol, chain, TVL, APR history, TVL trends and Scanner Score✅ Just try it:👉 de.fi/explore
⚡️Our partnership with Symbiosis continues!🤝 Symbiosis brings liquidity from Bitcoin, Solana, TRON and 45+ EVM networks into one smooth cross-chain experience De.Fi adds the security layer through Antivirus and SocialFi integrations, helping protect users from Web3 risks🛡️ More chains. More access. Better protection.
🚨 Reminder: We're going LIVE today at 8 AM PST! 🎙️ Curious where DeFi is heading next?🤔 Join us alongside SonicLabs, MetisL2, CapLabsLimited & MC2Finance as we dive into the trends shaping the next chapter of DeFi 🔔 You can't miss this: https://x.com/i/spaces/1aKbddzoDErJX/peek?s=20
🚨Get ready for another Epic X Spaces! 🎙 We will do a deep dive into the mechanics of DeFi done right. Let's talk about about stuff everyone wants to know about.🚀 Join our Guest Speakers: SonicLabs, MetisL2, CapLabsLimited, MC2Finance 📅July 15, 8AM PST 🛎️Set your alarms amigos: https://x.com/i/spaces/1aKbddzoDErJX/peek?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @defi_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 174,704 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“De.Fi 2.0 Announcements” (@defi_ann), 18,035 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defi_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.