Channel
@partisiampc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,832subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001242329739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @partisiampc |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/partisiampc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 5,832 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 5,845 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 5,857 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 5,857 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
299 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 94 | 31.4% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 23.1% | |
| 👏 | 45 | 15.1% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 13.7% | |
| 🏆 | 27 | 9.03% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.34% | |
| 🎄 | 5 | 1.67% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.00% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.669% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.669% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.334% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.334% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.334% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.334% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The PBC Wallet Early Access is now live. The PBC Wallet is the new mobile-first wallet experience, designed to make it easier to access and interact with the ecosystem through self-custody, WalletConnect support, QR payments, and more. The wallet is now available on both iOS and Android: • iOS: [Download on the App Store] • Android: [Download on Google Play] To help users get started, we have published a set of g…
👏15🔥4💯1
Liquid staking for $MPC is live on Partisia Blockchain with Sceptre. Stake $MPC, receive $sMPC, earn weekly rewards, and keep your capital active in the ecosystem. The Sceptre smart contract for Partisia has also been fully audited, reflecting the team's commitment to providing a secure liquid staking experience. Our step-by-step guide walks through everything you need to know: Stake $MPC → Receive $sMPC
👍9
We are proud to have participated in the launch of the UNDP Blockchain Advisory Group in Paris. Partisia Foundation was represented by Yusef Fanous, Chief Commercial Officer, alongside organisations including Ethereum Foundation, Cardano Foundation, Stellar Development Foundation, Algorand Foundation and Celo. The first discussion focused on financial inclusion and digital finance, including barriers around payment…
❤23
Digital identity means very little if trust, privacy and governance only appear after deployment. Peter Frands Frandsen joins Blockchain Talks #5 to discuss what changes when proof is built into the infrastructure from the start. Details: Blockchain Talks #5: Digital Identity, Privacy, and Impact 📅 Thursday, 12 March 2026 | 🕑 15:00 - 16:30 CET | 💻 Online 👇Register Zoom
👍6🔥3
We'd like to share the recap from the Node Operator AMA for Sceptre Liquid Staking We covered: • How liquid staking with $sMPC works • How Sceptre evaluates and selects node operators • Rewards, cooldowns and the redemption process • Incoming $sMPC/$MPC liquidity pools • What liquid staking enables for DeFi on PBC • Operator Q and A on delegation, support and rollout Get the full recap at the link below: https://…
👍8⚡3❤2
Sceptre Liquid Staking is here. A major step forward for the Partisia Blockchain ecosystem. We’re excited to announce that Sceptre has launched liquid staking on Partisia Blockchain. This launch gives the Partisia community, as early supporters, first access to stake $MPC through Sceptre and receive $sMPC. You’ll earn staking rewards while keeping your assets liquid and ready to use in the PBC ecosystem. How Liq…
🔥16🏆2🎄1👏1🥰1
We’re hosting a Community Call to discuss Ecosystem Updates. This session will be an open, insightful conversation so come ready with your questions and thoughts to share. Host: Yusef_Fanous Speaker: Peter Frandsen Speaker: Bruce Ahn Speaker: Mathias Glintborg Share your questions at the link: Form Link Details Date: 🗓 Nov 19th Time: ⏰ 1:00 PM UTC Location: 🎙 Live on X Spaces https://x.com/i/spaces/1mnGeNEqWRLJX?…
👍9🔥5
Aug–Sept 2025 Update: idOS Launch, InterChain Bridges Go Live and Major Staking + Performance Upgrades Across Partisia Blockchain From privacy to performance, the past two months marked a turning point for Partisia Blockchain. Staking became more efficient, nodes faster and contracts smarter. A new replay mode accelerates sync, while the upgraded Execution Engine enhances agility for builders. idOS launched as a pr…
👍8❤3🔥3
🎬ICYMI🎬 We'd like you all to Join us for an X Spaces with leaders shaping the future of privacy-enhancing technologies and policy frameworks. Topic: How regulation and PETs can co-evolve to protect data without stifling innovation. Host: Yusef Fanous - @Yusef_Fanous Speaker: Peter Frandsen - @partisiampc Featuring voices from @COTInetwork | @SecretNetwork | @mindnetwork_xyz | @partisiampc 🗓️ Date: Oct 8, 2PM UTC…
🔥9
We’re excited to share that Partisia Blockchain will be live today on XSpaces! Topic: Privacy in Web3 how to conceal your Web3 identity & why it matters Host: Silent Swap Featuring: Partisia Blockchain (List of line-up) 🕒 Time: 22:00 UTC 🔔 Set a reminder: XSpaces link
👏11🎄4🐳1
We’re excited to share that Partisia Blockchain will be joining the next episode of "The Age of Credible Crypto" Partisia Blockchain will be engaging with the global community on critical topics at the intersection of AI and Privacy. Topic: AI x Privacy Who Owns the Future of Intelligence? Explore how technologies like MPC (Multi-Party Computation) can ensure intelligence remains secure, trustworthy and user-owned.…
👍18👏8🏆5❤2🤔1🥰1😁1
This is a follow up reminder to a previously pinned announcement 🚨 (TOMORROW) Solutions for Health & Social Sector Challenges🚨 When: Friday, August 15th at 15:00 CET If you're a manager, project manager, or technical expert working with NGOs in healthcare, social services, or public health, this is for you. We'll address: 🔹 Funding that goes through many intermediaries and loses resources 🔹 Slow coordination betw…
🔥12👏6❤5👍2🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @partisiampc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 228,429 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@partisiampc named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Partisia Blockchain Announcements” (@partisiampc), 5,832 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/partisiampc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.