Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cere Network Announcement Channel

Channel

Cere Network Announcement Channel

@cerenetwork

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,366subscribers

-430 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001361600093
TypeChannel
Username@cerenetwork
DescriptionPlease visit our Website & Social Media: Our website: https://www.cere.network/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/cereofficial Blog: https://cere.network/blog Cere Hub https://cere.notion.site/ca8a73da630847df897bf47ce911dd7c
Created2 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cerenetwork

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3668,7968,5816 August 2026 — 8,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,781 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,770 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,747 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,730 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,719 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,695 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,683 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,669 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,662 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,638 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,627 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,616 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,581 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,553 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,524 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,504 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,479 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,455 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,441 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,429 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,398 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,387 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,380 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,366 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net -430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,302–8,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 03:098,366-14
7 Nov 2026, 04:198,380-7
3 Nov 2026, 23:508,387-11
31 Oct 2026, 13:078,398-31
28 Oct 2026, 03:068,429-12
25 Oct 2026, 12:298,441-14
22 Oct 2026, 17:068,455-24
19 Oct 2026, 02:518,479-25
16 Oct 2026, 03:398,504-20
12 Oct 2026, 18:088,524-29
5 Oct 2026, 23:188,553-28
28 Sept 2026, 09:578,581-35
18 Sept 2026, 12:418,616-11
13 Sept 2026, 22:218,627-11
9 Sept 2026, 18:588,638-24
4 Sept 2026, 02:168,662-7
31 Aug 2026, 18:488,669-14
28 Aug 2026, 19:038,683-12
26 Aug 2026, 02:068,695-24
22 Aug 2026, 15:288,719first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.72%
avg views ÷ 8,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
813
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.246%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held21 (6 August 2025 – 17 October 2026)
Views total813
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
309
Videos
16
Links
464

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13458.3%
❤9139.6%
🎉52.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

17 Oct 2026, 17:41 UTC813 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

If you’re holding $CERE on KuCoin, there’s a 2,000 USDT prize pool up for grabs 🔥 Waitlist: 12:00 UTC, Oct 17 Start: 00:00 UTC, Oct 18 End: 00:00 UTC, Nov 1 Join here: https://app.origami.tech/competitions/254

🔥2

15 Apr 2026, 13:21 UTC≈4,520 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

📢Update on the recent Hyperbridge incident We want to reassure our community that Cere Network's operations remain unaffected. Due to our secure lock & release integration and minimal exposure, the impact on Cere is negligible. A small batch (valued at $4,500) of $CERE tokens was affected and they have already been absorbed by the market. There is no further impact. Hyperbridge is actively working on fixes and out…

❤8🔥7

4 Mar 2026, 10:58 UTC≈4,150 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

What AI agent/automation tools are you actually using day-to-day?

  1. OpenClaw42%
  2. Sim.ai2%
  3. n8n19%
  4. Zapier12%
  5. CrewAI7%
  6. LangChain8%
  7. Make5%
  8. Other41%

The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤4

24 Feb 2026, 09:44 UTC≈4,210 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚀 New Runtime Upgrade Referendum is Live! We've just proposed Release-v7.3.14, a runtime dependency upgrade from polkadot-stable2506 → polkadot-stable2512, keeping Cere aligned with the latest audited Polkadot/Substrate runtime and unblocking future upgrades. 🗳️ Referenda is live now: vote before execution on Wednesday at 2 PM CET! What this upgrade brings ✅ Latest security patches, consensus & runtime bug fixes f…

🔥4❤1

2 Dec 2025, 11:18 UTC≈4,720 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚀 New Runtime Upgrade Referendum is Live! We’ve just proposed an upgrade to run the Cere chain on Polkadot-stable2506 (from 2503). This keeps Cere aligned with the latest audited Polkadot/Substrate runtime and unblocks future upgrades (2509, 2512, etc.). What this upgrade brings - ✅ Latest security patches, bug fixes & protocol improvements from upstream - ✅ A clean upgrade path for the next Polkadot-stable releases…

🔥10❤5

7 Nov 2025, 12:15 UTC≈4,300 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚀 Referendum 44 is live: unblock nomination pool users 🗳️ This proposal re-enables users to access the funds that were previously stuck in the Subwallet and Talisman nomination pools — a follow-up to the successful fix in Proposal 43. 🗳️ Cast your vote here: https://cere.polkassembly.io/referenda/44

🔥3

29 Oct 2025, 14:42 UTC≈4,310 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🗳️ Referendum 43: Fix for Withdrawals From Nomination Pools TL;DR: Some delegators couldn’t withdraw their unbonded funds due to a delegatedStaking.notEnoughFunds error. This referendum ships a runtime fix that correctly links Staking and DelegatedStaking, so unbonded tokens properly propagate and become withdrawable. What’s changing - Ensures proper linkage between the staking and DelegatedStaking modules. - Once y…

❤3🔥2

22 Oct 2025, 14:30 UTC≈3,150 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔈Cere × UofT AI Agents Club Hackathon 🔈 We’re excited to collaborate with the University of Toronto AI Agents Club on a 3-day AI agents hackathon (Oct 27–30). The program is designed for UofT students to explore Cere’s AI Stack, building and deploying live agents on real Telegram data. What this partnership highlights - Event-driven data processing with Streams & Rafts - Modular agent deployment and real-time obser…

❤16

22 Oct 2025, 12:33 UTC≈2,700 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🗳 Referendum #41 — Temporarily chill underperforming validators TL;DR: This proposal temporarily chills a set of consistently underperforming/unstable validators on Cere mainnet so the network can finalize blocks reliably, protect nominators from unnecessary slashing, and unblock the pending runtime upgrade. Please review and vote below. Nominators: Unstake / re-delegate away from the underperforming validators now …

🔥5❤4

9 Oct 2025, 15:59 UTC≈2,410 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Going live in 2 minutes with the community AMA on Discord: https://discord.gg/f8Jqxk5M?event=1425602957537312848 🫡

🔥4

8 Oct 2025, 22:11 UTC≈2,610 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Tomorrow at 4PM UTC Bren will be holding a community AMA on Discord: https://discord.gg/f8Jqxk5M?event=1425602957537312848

🔥8

25 Sept 2025, 10:35 UTC≈2,880 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Cere AI Stack Alpha test 🔥 We need your help to stress test our new system. 👉 How to join: 1️⃣ Jump into @thisiscere 2️⃣ Type /fun 3️⃣ Send the bot a selfie 🤳 💰 Bonus: The funniest/coolest selfie wins $50 USDC 💡 Why this matters This bot isn’t just a toy, it’s a fun way way to test our the underlying Cere AI Stack end-to-end. - Custom/open source models are hosted on Cere’s DDC (in this test we use SAM2 Hiera L…

🔥12❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cerenetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Mar 2026, 10:58 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

What AI agent/automation tools are you actually using day-to-day?

  1. OpenClaw42%
  2. Sim.ai2%
  3. n8n19%
  4. Zapier12%
  5. CrewAI7%
  6. LangChain8%
  7. Make5%
  8. Other41%

The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 17 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Casper Official Announcements
@casperofficialann · 33,929
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
Portal to Bitcoin Announcements
@portaltobitcoin_announcements · 83,032
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cere Network Announcement Channel” (@cerenetwork), 8,366 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cerenetwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.