Channel
@covalenthqann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,597subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001227566680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @covalenthqann |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/covalenthqann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 1,597 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:48 | 1,614 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 1,608 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,618 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,626 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 1,629 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 1,623 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 1,620 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 1,629 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,631 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 40.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 8.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Blockchain data is becoming programmable infrastructure. Your usage of it should be too. Today we shipped the GoldRush Usage API: the same daily usage, credit burn, and per-key breakdown you saw in the dashboard - now one API call away Learn more: https://x.com/i/status/2082904389925380529
❤1
Support for Robinhood Chain by Robinhood is now live on GoldRush. Learn more: https://x.com/i/status/2074237083577909309
❤1
GoldRush June recap: 3 launches across EVM traces, HyperCore and more Full breakdown below 🧵 https://x.com/goldrushdev/status/2073105077339099601?s=20
GoldRush is the complete data layer for Hyperliquid. You probably know the GoldRush Hyperliquid API for its HyperCore coverage. We also cover HyperEVM. Learn more https://x.com/i/status/2069152349474750837
We just fixed the biggest blind spot in onchain transaction history If your transaction history has ever had gaps you couldn't explain, this is why. GoldRush now covers traces support Learn more: https://x.com/goldrushdev/status/2067685297668993387
❤1
In October 2025, Hyperliquid activated HIP-3, a protocol change that lets any team willing to stake HYPE tokens deploy custom perpetual futures on its native order book, targeting any asset with a reliable price feed. Eight months later: $3 billion in open interest across stocks, indices, commodities, and pre-IPO companies. Twelve of Hyperliquid's top 20 markets by volume are now RWA assets. This article maps the ec…
We just made every custom blockchain indexer obsolete. GoldRush Pipeline API is live. 🧵: https://x.com/goldrushdev/status/2065150906942017968
🔥2👍1
Hyperliquid just rate-limited their own public WebSocket endpoints: • webData2 → slowed to 15s push. Being deprecated. • allMids → slowed to every 5 seconds. • l2Book → forced tradeoff: speed or depth, not both. GoldRush's Hyperliquid APIs are drop in replacements with no rate limits. Full depth. Real-time. One API key. No deprecations. Sign up and all APIs are free for 2 weeks. Try them out! https://x.com/i/sta…
$1.77 trillion valuation. $135 a share. The largest IPO in history. SpaceX is going public this Thursday. Crypto already priced it weeks ago though - a pre-IPO perp went live on HIP-3 by Tradexyz on Hyperliquid. Opened at $150, ran to $216, sitting at $168 today. Still 24% above what Wall Street is offering it at. It’ll be interesting to watch how $SPCX converges from $168 toward $135 this week, that price action…
👏3👍1
$3B in RWA open interest. On Hyperliquid alone. Finance is transitioning on-chain. What used to live in Bloomberg terminals and brokerage accounts is now tradeable, queryable, and composable on-chain. RWAs are how it happens, and at GoldRush, we are indexing it all. Across every market: • Equities • Indices • Commodities • Treasuries & Bonds You can now build a RWA dashboard with the most granular data in 5 mins …
👍2❤1
"Everybody knows Anthropic, but no one talks about databricks. They are like the unsung hero." Ganesh on our community call, breaking down the medallion architecture, pioneered by Databricks. It helps us differentiate raw data, refined data, and business ready data. A legacy framework, brought onchain and implemented by Covalent. This matters because blockchain data never stops growing. We have every block, trans…
❤1
GoldRush May recap: 7 launches across Hyperliquid, Pipeline API, and more. Full breakdown below 🧵 https://x.com/i/status/2060420950190133751
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @covalenthqann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Covalent Official Announcements” (@covalenthqann), 1,597 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/covalenthqann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.