Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Davide Lombardi Official

Channel

Davide Lombardi Official

@davidelombardiofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,585subscribers

+275 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485649364
TypeChannel
Username@davidelombardiofficial
Descriptiondavidelombardi.net
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/davidelombardiofficial

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,31011,58511,447.56 August 2026 — 11,310 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,324 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,323 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,330 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,334 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,336 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,339 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,357 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,359 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,367 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,369 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,373 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,394 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,392 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,399 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,401 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,405 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,417 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,440 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,471 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,487 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,489 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,492 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,491 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,500 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,496 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,499 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,501 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,493 subscribers29 September 2026 — 11,529 subscribers5 October 2026 — 11,538 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,546 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,542 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,547 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,550 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,552 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,554 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,551 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,558 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,557 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,558 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,556 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,561 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,563 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,559 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,556 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,559 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,568 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,564 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,569 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,574 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,572 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,576 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,577 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,580 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,575 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,585 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net +275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,269–11,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 14:1611,585+10
7 Nov 2026, 08:5711,575-5
6 Nov 2026, 11:3611,580+3
5 Nov 2026, 09:1911,577+1
4 Nov 2026, 11:0811,576+4
3 Nov 2026, 14:3711,572-2
1 Nov 2026, 20:4711,574+5
31 Oct 2026, 20:4911,569+5
31 Oct 2026, 00:1711,564-4
30 Oct 2026, 01:4811,568+9
29 Oct 2026, 04:2711,559+3
28 Oct 2026, 04:2911,556-3
27 Oct 2026, 01:0811,559-4
26 Oct 2026, 02:1011,563+2
24 Oct 2026, 03:2811,561+5
23 Oct 2026, 00:5911,556-2
21 Oct 2026, 23:1611,558+1
20 Oct 2026, 20:4911,557-1
19 Oct 2026, 18:5711,558+7
18 Oct 2026, 20:3811,551first reading

Engagement

284 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 11,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
50
of 284 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held284 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total174,430
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,740
Videos
≈5,830
Links
≈13,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (2.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Link originale https://x.com/gugelpixel/status/2119061163174482368/photo/2

8 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

"🚨 5 paesi. 5 sistemi bancari. Tutti sotto attacco simultaneo. Ecco com’era la prima settimana della crisi bancaria del 2008. Una riga qui. Una riga là. Nessuno la chiamava crisi. Situazione odierna: 1/ Indonesia: In sole 24 ore, oltre 200.000 attacchi informatici hanno preso di mira banche, società finanziarie e assicurative. E gli attacchi continuano ancora. Tutti gli addetti IT delle banche nazionali stanno con…

8 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,160 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Video https://x.com/DeepLeaksHQ/status/2119047250370584920/video/1

7 Nov 2026, 21:20 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Non credo che cambi molto, ma sembra che uscirà proprio di scena questa volta.

7 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

COSI' SI VOTA VERAMENTE Le azioni di Beyond Meat, azienda sostenuta da Bill Gates, sono scese a circa 6 dollari, un crollo notevole rispetto al massimo storico di 7.191,30 dollari raggiunto il 2 maggio 2019: si tratta di una flessione del 99,7% Il produttore di carne falsa a base vegetale in cui Bill ha investito pesantemente ha visto le proprie vendite crollare dai 465 milioni di dollari del 2021 ai 275 milioni dell…

7 Nov 2026, 20:43 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

E' lo spazio vuoto che crea materia. L'esperimento presso il Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider di Brookhaven, ad opera del team STAR, ha dimostrato che la materia (i quark) appare dal nulla in uno spazio vuoto. Il "nulla" non è mai stato davvero vuoto. Stava solo aspettando. Il vuoto è la vera madre. In principio non ci fu il verbo (suono) e poi la luce. In principio ci fu l'oscurità. Il vasto vuoto materialmente, ma…

7 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 8 November 2026

ANCHE OGGI Siccome nessuno più abbocca alla storia dei droni, allora si procede con gli allarmi bomba. L'obiettivo? Installare il concetto di guerra ibrida, preparare le masse aille prossime guerre già preparate da tempo https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2026/11/07/news/allarme_bomba_aerei_secondo_giorno_meloni_vertice_ue-425705731/?fbclid=IwY2xjawVcYmZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBwZG9mBXNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAA…

7 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 8 November 2026

Hanno appena sparato in centro storico a Cracovia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKf3gFCnXuI

7 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 8 November 2026

Le Canarie stanno per entrare in una crisi come Ceuta? https://www.vaticannews.va/it/mondo/news/2026-11/migranti-rifugiati-atlantico-canarie-spagna-europa-ceuta.html

7 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 8 November 2026

CIA e Italia https://web.facebook.com/reel/1111869211488957

Showing the 12 most recent of 284 posts we hold for @davidelombardiofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@davidelombardiofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @davidelombardiofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Michele Giovagnoli (canale ufficiale)
@michelegiovagnoli · 36,908
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
DataBase Italia
@databaseitalia · 38,864
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Sir Red Ronnie
@RedRonnieTv · 32,666
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
RADIOGREG.info - SOLO PER LO 0.3% ☄☄☄
@radiogreginfo · 21,927
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
Francesco Carrino Official
@carrinof · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
Alberto Ferrarini
@ALBERTOFERRARINI · 63,344
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi e ci Fa Incazzare
@Laveritacirendeliberiecifaincazz · 27,432
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
IL RISVEGLIO DELLA FENICE
@ilrisvegliodellafenice · 22,140
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Davide Lombardi Official” (@davidelombardiofficial), 11,585 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidelombardiofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.