Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bitcoin Hub

Channel

Bitcoin Hub

@BitcoinPodcastTelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

601subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821418665
TypeChannel
Username@BitcoinPodcastTelegram
DescriptionRaccolta di contenuti selezionati a tema Bitcoin
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BitcoinPodcastTelegram

Growth

60113 Sept 2026, 22:47 — 601 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 23:22 — 601 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 22:4713 Sept 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 600–602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 23:22601no change
13 Sept 2026, 22:47601first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 601 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held20 (10 September 202613 September 2026)
Views total1,829
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,920
Videos
1,370
Links
970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @subito_crypto_vetrinaPhoto

🫙 ABBRACCIO / Crema dolce spalmabile 💰 15.000 sats (≈ 9,99 €) 📍 Dro (TN) 🚚 Spedizione a casa o a un punto di ritiro — 14.000 sats 🤝 Ritiro in zona 🫙 Apri su Barattolo ⚡ Pagabile in Satoshi 🛍 Anche in vendita da lui: • KETO LOVE by Day / Crema dolce spalmabile • KETO LOVE by Night / Crema dolce spalmabile • CAREZZA / Crema dolce spalmabile Annuncio da @lucabortolameotti · 🟣 npub1gzdm8…ce6l — vedi il suo negozio #a

2

13 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC75 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🫙 Keystone tavoletta metallica per backup seedphrase 💰 50,00 € (≈ 75.760 sats) 🚚 Spedizione a casa o a un punto di ritiro — 1,00 € 🫙 Apri su Barattolo ⚡ Pagabile in Satoshi 🛍 Anche in vendita da lui: • Gorillapod Joby • Bitbox 02 • Cassa Bluetooth JBL Clip4 Annuncio da @steu85 — vedi il suo negozio #bitcoin #barattolo

12 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC79 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @newsvillaggiobitcoin

⚠️ REVOLUT HA CONSEGNATO I DATI DEI CLIENTI A UNA FALSA RICHIESTA GOVERNATIVA Passaporti, selfie KYC, indirizzi, IBAN, estratti conto e storico completo delle transazioni, comprese quelle Bitcoin. La richiesta arrivava da un account compromesso appartenente al dominio reale di un ente governativo. Revolut l’ha considerata autentica e ha consegnato i dati. Solo dopo ha scoperto che la richiesta era fraudolenta. Qu

12 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Dopo quello che è capitato con wallet of Satoshi e che ho documentato in una guida, spero proprio che qui dentro non ci sia nessuno che sta ancora utilizzando questo che più che un wallet è uno Scam. Scrivo questo perché il RED TEAM sta indagando su un probabile exploit su Spark che ha già permesso la sottrazione di svariati Fondi. Wallet of Satoshi e Thether credo siano gli unici due wallet che usano Spark. Nel

1

11 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC109 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🇵🇦 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗦𝗨 𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠 🇵🇦 📅 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗗𝗜̀ 𝟭𝟭 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗥𝗘 🕘 𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝟮𝟭:𝟬𝟬 Si parla sempre più spesso di 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘇𝗮 𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 🇵🇦, ma quando si decide di iniziare le domande sono tante: 🤔 A chi affidarsi? 📄 Qual è il percorso giusto? 💰 I costi proposti sono adeguati? 🧭 Da dove cominciare? 🎙 𝗢𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗧𝗘: @Ire0Klett Durante la live condividerà la propria esperienza diretta e il percorso seguito per ottenere la 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘇𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲

11 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC68 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @barattolostorePhoto

🚀 Partecipa alla live e incassa il tuo badge di partecipazione direttamente su Nostr! 📚 Ti insegniamo ad usare Nostr: durante la live ti spieghiamo come ottenere questo badge per ringraziarti. 🍯 E soprattutto imparerai ad utlizzare il mercatino più innovativo ed emergente di Italia! 🗓 Non mancare: lunedì alle 21 su BitVero!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitcoinPodcastTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Francesco Carrino Official
@carrinof · 25,663
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitcoin Hub” (@BitcoinPodcastTelegram), 601 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinPodcastTelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.