Oggi sugli exchange c'è movimento, ma manca un innesco che faccia muovere il prezzo in modo significativo. Stanotte però, dopo la riapertura delle borse asiatiche, qualcosa potrebbe accadere.

Channel
Marco Cavicchioli
@marcocavicchioliufficiale
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,269subscribers
-305 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001361069700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marcocavicchioliufficiale |
| Description | Notizie ad analisi su Bitcoin e criptovalute, sui mercati finanziari e su quelli crypto. Per interagire con me utilizzate Linkedin. Il mio sito web ufficiale è www.MarcoCavicchioli.it. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marcocavicchioliufficiale |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:19 | 14,269 | +3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:26 | 14,266 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:27 | 14,270 | +17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 14,253 | +7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:48 | 14,246 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 14,258 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 14,260 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:37 | 14,270 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 14,274 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 14,282 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 14,285 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 14,287 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 14,292 | +10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 14,282 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 14,288 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 14,287 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 14,291 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 14,285 | +25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 14,260 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 14,267 | first reading |
Engagement
307 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.8%
- avg views ÷ 14,269 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,690
- 104 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 108
- of 307 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 307 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 175,272 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,830
- Videos
- ≈24
- Links
- ≈5,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.651%
- 2 of 307 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 1,530
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,940
- over 291 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 307 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 108 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Se volete spostare i vostri fondi su un altro exchange vi consiglio Bybit. C'è anche in atto una promozione: https://partner.bybit.eu/b/myfmc
Vi consiglio di mettetervi un alert a 0,995 su COINBASE:USD1USD, e poi magari anche uno a 0,989
Attenzione: questo è un grafico decisamente bruttino. Si tratta del valore in dollari della stablecoin USD1 del progetto crypto della famiglia Trump (World Liberty Financial). Visto che è il grafico di una stablecoin, la curva discendente degli ultimi giorni è davvero bruttina.
Ecco cosa è successo stamattina alle 5: https://youtube.com/shorts/_4ZPwTwokuA?si=5jHTGh1BwdwkPkcf
Ci sono però anche stati quasi contemporaneamente depositi di BTC sul mercato dei derivati. Potrebbe essere in arrivo volatilità...
Stanotte ci sono stati alcuni prelievi di BTC di entità elevata dagli exchange. Sospetto siano balene che hanno comprato. Nel complesso le cifre non sono enormi, ma presi singolarmente sono prelievi di cifre interessanti.
Questa settimana credo sia iniziato il vero scoppio della bolla degli asset value-growth di cui vi ho parlato ultimamente in alcuni video. Tale scoppio potrebbe durare ancora per qualche settimana, ed in teoria dovrebbe liberare liquidità che potrebbe andare su oro e Bitcoin.
Al posto di Binance usate Bybit: https://partner.bybit.eu/b/cavi25
Mi raccomando: se siete residenti in un Paese dell'Unione Europea ed avete ancora fondi su Binance (😑) RITIRATELI!
Oggi si preannuncia una giornata molto tranquilla (a meno che non vi siano improvvise novità rilevanti).
Il governo USA sta continuando a rilasciare miliardi di dollari sul mercato negli ultimi giorni (sebbene non molti)
Showing the 12 most recent of 307 posts we hold for @marcocavicchioliufficiale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@marcocavicchioliufficiale edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@criptovalutait · 28,968
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@the10mintraderofficial · 41,615
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@TheCryptoGateway · 88,324
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@carrinof · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@toncoin_it · 56,136
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@rfcofficialchannel · 26,060
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marco Cavicchioli” (@marcocavicchioliufficiale), 14,269 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marcocavicchioliufficiale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.