رفقا چنتا نکته اولا لطفا فقط دوستانی که توانایی ریسکپذیری و پذیرش بالا و همچنین پتانسیل رشد در خودشون میبینن و دارای شرایطن همراه بشن و UIDهارو با فرمتی که گفته شده بفرستن دوما هر هفته یک سری اعضا حذف میشن و یک سری از اعضا هم مجدد اضافه میشن این موضوع حذف شدن و اینا ارتباطی به بنده نداره و توسط اسپانسرینگ صرافیها انجام میشه یک سری هم حذف میشن و گروهشون بنا به صلاحدید من عوض میشه خواستم این موضوع رو بگم که شخصی بر…

Channel
Addwin | Kimiagar 🧿 سیگنال طلا کریپتو
@Addwin_VIP
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
337,603subscribers
+37,713 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002063323221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Addwin_VIP |
| Description | IN GOD WE TRUST Crypto Strategist, Investor, Economist, and Coach , Founder of roulette trading and new alchemy (Alchemist) با سابقهترین کوچ تخصصی تریدرها @Advinfar |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Addwin_VIP |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 337,603 | -4,592 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 342,195 | +586 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 341,609 | +10,052 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 331,557 | -4,785 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 336,342 | -10,232 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 346,574 | +29,551 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 317,023 | +18,451 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 298,572 | +443 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 298,129 | -764 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 298,893 | -857 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 299,750 | -1,792 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 301,542 | -559 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 302,101 | -389 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 302,490 | +1,556 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 300,934 | +740 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 300,194 | +652 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 299,542 | -930 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 300,472 | +1,149 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 299,323 | +5,404 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 293,919 | first reading |
Engagement
477 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.05%
- avg views ÷ 337,603 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,540
- 319 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 324
- of 477 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 319 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 477 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,130,824 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,790
- Videos
- ≈87
- Links
- ≈4,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
188 reactions across 21 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 188 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 477 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 477 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 889
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 47
- of 472 we hold a reading for · 10%
- Most on one post
- 101
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Addwin_VIP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 477 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
ممنون فوق العاذه ایییی
از وقتی باهات اشنا شدم یعنی همیشه سود کردم مارت انداختن و مدیریت سرمایه و نیم درصدی ورود کردن و از همه مهمتر اینکه کدوم ارز بنیه داره هر شت کویینی ورود نکنم
Photo, posted without a caption
استادددددذذ پوزیشنارو بستم ممنون واقعااااا
☄️به جز بیت و اتر که توو سودن این آلتای توی ضررو به صورت سویینگ داریم...
در مورد مارکت و پامپهایی که میکنه با توجه به شرایط اصلا خوشبین نیستم...
تا من مجدد برسم و بیام پای چارت آپدیت کردن و سیگنالو لایوتریدو این حرفا شما در حین مرور کانال، همبستگی و اتحاد ایجاد کنید و برای شروع یک مسیر پر چالش اما لذتبخش و پر از فراوانی قدم بردارید، در نتیجه این سه تا کارو بکنید تا منم دلسرد نشم و انرژی بگیرم: 🚩یکی پویا باشید چون پویایی،انرژی شمارو به من نشون میده 🚩دو اینکه بنا به قرارمون شات سوداتونو بفرستید که بذارم 🚩سه اینکه برای اتحاد و همبستگی و بنا به دلایلی که گفتم، با…
در مورد مارکت لازمه به عنوان کسی که همیشه در کنارتون بوده بگم که نه هیچ بالایی دائمیه و نه هیچ پایینی،تنها لازمه که شما مدیریت نیم درصدی رو رعایت کنید،استاپ ظرفیتی رو ست کنید و رها کنید این بیسیکترین و آرامش بخش ترین راهه... دیگه بحث قمار کردن و ریسک بالا کردن یا روی ارزای عجیب پوزیشن بازکردن کلا یه بحث دیگس... همیشه معتقدم کار خوبه خدا درست کنه،و همه چی دست خود خودشه و چیزی که قرار باشه بشه،میشه😍 مارکت دقیقاً وار…
من و تیم جدیدم،تمام سیگنالهای مربوط به آلتکوینهارو برای طرفداران آلتکوینها در استوریهای اینستاگرام به لینک زیر👇قرار دادیم✅ https://www.instagram.com/advinfar?stkn=ODFrZzdtZmxicXBu&utm_source=qr
از این پس یک سری سیگنالها در استوری اینستاگرام منتشر میشه الانم اونجا منتشر شده✅ اینستاگرام
Showing the 12 most recent of 477 posts we hold for @Addwin_VIP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Addwin_VIP edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SirBitMiner · 774,491#1
@Addwin_signals · 12,689#2
@Addwin_goldminer · 423#3
@Addwin_trade · 523#4
@lordcryptovip · 802,622#5
@vision_cip · 353#6
@YeganeCrypto · 280,733#7
@uztraderclub · 517,317#8
@RstCrypto · 392,078#9
@ali_cryptoc · 12,138#10
@funobitexchange · 6,360#11
@cryptoplusers · 461,457#12
@sheraderCrypto · 146,028#13
@tvtsignal · 4,191#14
@narsiscrypto · 23,919#15
@lmbloodi · 15,226#16
@bsignal · 437,023#17
@Ar3yBiT · 701,726#18
@Capitan_traderr · 22,104#19
@lerningtraedlord · 17,406#20
@amircrypto_whale · 5,616#21
@Amirkingama · 5,317#22
@khancryptoir · 209,389#23
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 83,127#24
@Jms_CryPto · 11,934#25
@Real_Ayhan · 113,231#26
@Wall_Team · 37,056#27
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,519#28
@cryptokiilerr · 30,923#29
@AmirCrypttoo · 11,538#30
@Radcryptosignal · 96,551#31
@forex_hadii · 15,419#32
@sijnal · 80,357#33
@iMTProto · 7,597,568#34
@Wave_Chanel · 587,051#35
@ChartsPrice · 82,161#36
@scalpery8 · 24,759#37
@TheGodZil · 33,271#38
@farhad1356 · 79,336#39
@RooyaBitcoiner · 5,474#40
@signallbinance · 13,673#41
@arzwhale · 36,838#42
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 43,968#43
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 104,509#44
@arash_timess · 425,333#45
@artavip · 6,695#46
@hoseini · 315,623#47
@ccoineres · 20,626#48
@TROON · 1,629,822#49
@best_siignal · 33,883#50
@tainyw · 3,992#51
@Crypto_Club2 · 3,621#52
@Airdrops_univers · 113,535#53
@SraTrade · 55,306#54
@IRAN_LEAK · 4,469#55
@SuperSignal_VIP · 234#56
@bande_akhar · 835#57
@mer_id1 · 1,481 (as read 10 August 2026)#58
@tatcoinn · 42,546#59
@hajalicryptooo · 48,691#60
@Erfan_xFx · 9,659#61
@LiquidityMafia · 17,037#62
@BTC_CUP · 5,195 (as read 10 August 2026)#63
@Cryptofa_official · 44,977#64
@lordcryptovipbot · 25,723#65
@MawtinCrypto_vip · 4,756,077#66
@autotradeforexlord · 9,226#67
@trade_hadi · 445,647#68
@fundora_finance · 6,809#69
@Shayan_cryptooo · 72,759#70
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 106,089#71
@Crypto_GRB · 13,426#72
@ARZ_PROXY · 1,521,237#73
@signnal_free · 9,678#74
@vipbaz_signal · 18,667#75
@Domino_trade · 8,260#76
@Gardesh_Trade · 1,146#77
@UZPROXYS · 834#78
@Caspian_Crypto · 84,695#79
@FREEVIP_SIGNALSM · 4#80
@Signal_Alpha · 168,017#81
@RayaCrypFx · 1,819#82
@CryptoPlus_company · 18,915#83
@hajtaha_crypto · 28,390#84
@bitcodee · 7,972#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SirBitMiner · 774,491
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@YeganeCrypto · 280,733
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@NovaSignalss · 486,701
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@Capitan_traderr · 22,104
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
@uztraderclub · 517,317
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@Sat0shi_Trade · 23,344
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@nofekran_crypto7761 · 42,134
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
@Purya_Futures · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@TheGodZil · 33,271
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
@bufalo_cryptoo · 27,219
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@bsignal · 437,023
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@EducateTrade · 24,081
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
@sheraderCrypto · 146,028
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@Wave_Chanel · 587,051
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
@Wall_Team · 37,056
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
@jet_crypto1 · 43,062
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@Ar3yBiT · 701,726
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@arzwhale · 36,838
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@cryptokiilerr · 30,923
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
@artafitnesss · 40,693
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
@mrsignal · 179,177
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@lordcryptovip · 802,622
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@cip_cry · 277,056
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@cryptoplusers · 461,457
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Addwin | Kimiagar 🧿 سیگنال طلا کریپتو” (@Addwin_VIP), 337,603 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Addwin_VIP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.