Пол О’Киф пишет, что примерно пару часов назад узнавал насчёт Фоларина Балогуна, и ему ответили, что это неправда, но, может, что-то и изменилось. @spurstg
👍34🤔5😭2
Signed Ali

Channel
@spurstg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,052subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001663211819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spurstg |
| Description | Не только о «Тоттенхэме». Но начинается всё с него. • Наш чат: @spurschat • ВК: https://vk.com/spursvk Автор канала: @alliisshhkkaa По сотрудничеству: @gushellos 🤍 To Dare Is To Do |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spurstg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:41 | 7,052 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 7,051 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 153,840 |
| Reactions total | 6,771 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,771 reactions across 54 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5451714942157724312 | 2,367 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 1,053 | 15.6% | |
| 🤔 | 785 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 528 | 7.80% | |
| 🤣 | 442 | 6.53% | |
| 👎 | 334 | 4.93% | |
| 🖕 | 317 | 4.68% | |
| 🤯 | 303 | 4.47% | |
| 😭 | 226 | 3.34% | |
| custom 5325593626942644207 | 163 | 2.41% | |
| custom 5307690038589413496 | 137 | 2.02% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 0.62% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 0.546% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 0.281% | |
| custom 5373049068488498208 | 18 | 0.266% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,771reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spurstg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пол О’Киф пишет, что примерно пару часов назад узнавал насчёт Фоларина Балогуна, и ему ответили, что это неправда, но, может, что-то и изменилось. @spurstg
👍34🤔5😭2
Signed Ali
Со стороны игрока отмечают, что Де Дзерби подкрепил свои многочисленные похвалы в адрес Бергвалля достаточным количеством игрового времени в предсезонных матчах, хотя есть понимание, что в сезоне так может и не продолжаться. По имеющейся информации, Бергвалль позитивно работал всё лето. Вместо того чтобы расстраиваться из-за отклонённых предложений о его трансфере, он сосредоточился на работе и продолжил выкладывать…
custom 5451714942157724312107👍17👏7🔥4
Signed Ali
Не сильно бы доверял этому журналисту Лоикy Танзи из L’Équipe, но он пишет, что «Монако» и «Тоттенхэм» заложили основу для переговоров о трансфере Фоларина Балогуна, который оценивается в 60 миллионов евро. @spurstg
🤔62👎18👍10custom 54517149421577243122
Signed Ali
Szy даёт немного информации насчёт трансферов. Насчёт трансфера Дестини Удоджи(Спенса): Это сумма [трансфера], которая отражает отношение Роберто Де Дзерби к нему с самого первого дня его назначения тренером «Тоттенхэма». Рассматривается ли Грей как замена Порро? Нет. На данный момент они ищут варианты на позицию крайнего защитника. А что насчёт нападающих? Савиньо и Гакпо. Это два игрока, которых хочет именно …
👍42🤔8custom 54517149421577243125
Signed Ali
«Тоттенхэм» и «Интер» обсуждают трансфер Джеда Спенса. Сумма сделки может составить около €30 млн (£25,6 млн). @spurstg
🖕169🤯17🤣8👍6custom 53076900385894134964
Signed Ali
«Ньюкасл Юнайтед» проявляет интерес к главному скауту дортмундской «Боруссии» Себастьяну Кругу. Другие клубы Премьер-лиги и Европы также следят за Кругом. Круг сыграл важную роль в переходах Эрлинга Холанда и Джуда Беллингема в «Боруссию». «Тоттенхэм» - ещё один клуб, который следит за Кругом. В настоящее время обсуждаются несколько кандидатов, поскольку «шпоры» планируют усилить свою скаутскую команду. @spurstg
custom 545171494215772431275👍10🔥8
Signed Ali
🎤Роберто Де Дзерби в интервью Men in Blazers: 🎤О подписании Энди Робертсона: «Мне нужен Энди Робертсон, ни больше ни меньше, потому что он универсальный игрок как на поле, так и за его пределами, с сильным характером. Я хочу, чтобы он играл так же, как в «Ливерпуле» — с той же энергией, той же самоотдачей, той же страстью и теми же качествами, потому что для нас он игрок топ-уровня. Мне бы хотелось, чтобы молодые и…
custom 545171494215772431242🤔6custom 53255936269426442073
Signed Ali
👕Клуб официально представил третий комплект формы на сезон 2026/27. Что думаем? @spurstg
👎154🔥51👍19custom 54517149421577243129🤔7😭6🤣2
Signed Виктор Васенин
🤍Майки Муру сегодня исполняется 19 лет. @spurstg
custom 5451714942157724312119👏15custom 53255936269426442079👎2
Signed Ali
Журналист нидерландского De Telegraaf Майк Вервей пишет, что по новому пятилетнему контракту Микки ван де Вен будет получать более 240 тысяч фунтов в неделю. @spurstg
🤯94custom 545171494215772431232🔥13custom 53076900385894134962
Signed Ali
🎤Микки ван де Вен – о подписании нового контракта с «Тоттенхэм Хотспур»: «Подписание нового контракта — это особенный и гордый момент для меня и моей семьи». «Я всегда любил «Тоттенхэм», с первого дня, как переступил порог. Я люблю этот клуб, люблю болельщиков, и здесь я очень хорошо развился». «Совершенно ясно, в каком направлении хочет двигаться клуб, и я хочу быть частью этого процесса. Я с нетерпением жду того, …
custom 5451714942157724312114👍13🔥9
Signed Ali
⚡️Официально: Микки Ван де Вен продлил свой контракт с «Тоттенхэмом». @spurstg
custom 5451714942157724312230🔥37custom 532559362694264420719custom 53730490684884982085
Signed Ali
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @spurstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 193,344 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я там, где "Тоттенхэм" • Spurs” (@spurstg), 7,052 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spurstg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.