Channel
@cripto_2025
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002117807860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cripto_2025 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cripto_2025 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 50 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 520 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 78.6% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حواستون به ارز متیک یا همون pol باشه فاندهای خوبی داره مثل همکاری با بانک های سوییس ،هم فیوچرز هم اسپات خبر مثبت و نسبتاً جدید: ورود سرمایهگذاران نهادی به استیکینگ POL بانک سوئیسی و تحت نظارت FINMA، یعنی AMINA Bank، استیکینگ POL را برای مشتریان نهادی ارائه کرده و طبق اعلام Polygon، اولین بانک تحت نظارت سوئیس است که چنین خدمتی را برای POL ارائه میکند. این موضوع از نظر پذیرش نهادی خبر مثبتی است. 2. تمرکز Polygon …
چرا طلا و نقرهی جهانی اخیرا جهش کردن؟ دو ماه پیش وقتی گزارش اشتغال آمریکا اونقدر بالا اومد و طلا ریخت، چند تا ادعای مشخص کردم. حالا گزارشهای جدید اومده و وقتشه صحت پیشبینیهای دو ماه پیش من رو با هم بسنجیم. دقت کن اینجا صحبت از ادعاهای کوتاهمدت و دیروز گفتم طلا میره بالا و امروز ۱۰۰۰ تومن گرونتر شده پس بیا از من ربات و سیگنال بخر نیست! حرف از پیشبینیهای چندین ماههست! ادعای اول: اون موقع همه ذوقزدهی ۱۷۲ هزار ش…
❤1
🪙 فکت تاریخی: 11 سال پیش تو همچین روزی #اتریوم برای اولین بار وارد صرافیها شد. اون روز قیمتش تا 2.8 دلار بالا رفت ولی تو مدت کوتاهی به زیر 1 دلار سقوط کرد.
برگرفته از کانال اقتصاد با امیر
❤1
این پست هم به درد کوتاهمدتیهای طلا و دلار میخوره هم بلندمدتیها. اول تکلیف کوتاهمدت رو روشن کنیم. ساختار قیمت طلای داخلی و دلار هنوز هیچ سیگنال خروجی نداده. نه سقفزنی فرسایشی میبینم نه نشونهی تخلیه. پس اونی که داره، نگه میداره. و اتفاقا برعکس، اگه اخبار توافق و آتشبس دوباره داغ شه و دلار رو موقتی بکشه سمت کانال ۱۷۰ و حتی ۱۶۰، اونجا برای من فرصت خریده نه جای ترس. و اگه ریزشی شروع شه، نقاط دقیق ورود رو براساس رون…
❤1
#BTC #H4 🔔بخاطر اینه که الان چسبیده به عرضه سنگین خودش و یه واکنش منفی اینجا میتونه بازار رو بدجور بریزونه و اگه مقاومت شکسته بشه 🚀🚀در حالت کلی منطقه تصمیم گیری نهنگاست✅ دوست دارم این یکی رو شما نهنگا بگین 👑 حرکت بعدی بازار کدوم سمتیه⁉️ (72k_74k)❤️ (58k_59k)👍 🚀 Telegram 🟢 KING TRADE
❤1
سهم آلتکوینها از حجم معاملات بایننس به رکورد جدیدی رسیده است! بر اساس دادههای CryptoQuant: آلتکوینها: بیش از 60٪ از حجم معاملات بایننس بیتکوین:22٪ اتریوم:18٪ این آمار نشان میدهد که در حال حاضر، بخش بزرگی از توجه معاملهگران به سمت آلتکوینها رفته و فعالیت روی آنها از بیتکوین و اتریوم بیشتر شده است.
گاهی يه لگد به اون چیزی كه ساختى بزن؛ نترس! اگه محكم باشه نميريزه.
❤1
سال ۲۰۱۹،لبنان لبنان سالها یه ویژگی عجیب داشت؛ بانکهاش معروف بودن. مردم لبنان، لبنانیهای خارج از کشور و حتی سرمایهگذارهای خارجی دلارهاشون رو میآوردن تو بانکهای لبنان، چون سودهای خیلی بالایی میگرفتن پشت پرده یه داستانی بود: بانکها بخش زیادی از این دلارها رو به بانک مرکزی و دولت قرض داده بودن. دولت هم سالها بیشتر از درآمدش خرج میکرد و با قرض گرفتن روزگار میگذروند. تا وقتی دلار از خارج وارد کشور میشد، این…
❤1
یکی از ترسناکترین هکهای تاریخ Bitcoin اتفاق افتاد: چون هکر عزیز قصه ی ما نه دستگاهها رو حتی تاچ کرد، نه Seed Phrase کسی رو دزدید از جایی ک مخفیش کردند، نه فیشینگ کرد و نه حتی لازم بود کیفپول victim روشن باشه. هکر فقط Seedها رو دوباره ساخت! همینقدر ساده! و البته از کوانتوم کامپیوتر هم استفاده نکرد. ماجرا مربوط به Coldcard، یکی از معروفترین Hardware Walletهای Bitcoinـه. قرار بوده دستگاه موقع ساخت کیفپول،…
دوران رونق طلایی بازار کریپتو و اون آلت سیزنی که سالها همه فعالان کریپتو منتظرشن احتمالا بعد این چهار ماه جهنمی خواهد بود اگر زنده بودیم، عمری باقی بود و اینترنتی بود میتونیم بازدهی خیلی خوبی تو اون دوران بگیریم جوری که همه سختیها و تلخیها و مرارت و رنجهای این چندسال رو بشوره ببره براش پلن و سیر معاملاتی داریم که توی اوج ترس، توی ریزشِ آخری که قبل دوران رونق طلایی اتفاق میفته بتونیم به موقع و سر بزنگاه، نقطه ع…
❤1😁1
🪙منطقه احتمالی کف بیتکوین؛ تاریخ تکرار میشود؟ 🔻در دو چرخه قبلی، بیتکوین در محدوده اصلاحی 38.2% تا 50% فیبوناچی به کف بازار رسید. 🔻اما تأیید نهایی کف تنها پس از شکست خط روند نزولی بازار خرسی اتفاق افتاد. ✍️تحلیل از Titan Of Crypto 🕯
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cripto_2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 575,986 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cripto 2025 🤖” (@cripto_2025), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cripto_2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.