Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Основатель mkeeper

Channel

Основатель mkeeper

@mkeeper

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,062subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649752698
TypeChannel
Username@mkeeper
DescriptionВсе про внутреннюю рекламу Wildberries. Сервис по автоматизации рекламы mkeeper @mkeeper_direct_bot Сотрудничество @mk_assistant
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mkeeper

Growth

22,06222,12122,091.57 August 2026 — 22,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,121 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,113 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,098 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,096 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,085 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,077 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,068 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,062 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,053–22,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:4322,062-6
15 Aug 2026, 10:3422,068-9
14 Aug 2026, 03:5622,077-8
12 Aug 2026, 19:3222,085-11
11 Aug 2026, 19:4622,096-2
10 Aug 2026, 19:2122,098-15
9 Aug 2026, 18:1122,113-6
8 Aug 2026, 21:1622,119-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:4822,121+5
7 Aug 2026, 08:3022,116no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2422,116first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 22,062 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,050
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held26 (22 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total209,210
Reactions total2,125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
438
Videos
11
Links
190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 25s
Average length
3m 48s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,125 reactions across 26 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩70733.3%
👍38718.2%
36517.2%
🔥25512.0%
🤯994.66%
😢703.29%
🤝502.35%
💔331.55%
👎311.46%
🥴190.894%
🤣180.847%
😱170.8%
🙏150.706%
👌100.471%
😁90.424%
🤬80.376%
💯70.329%
60.282%
❤‍🔥40.188%
🍓40.188%
5 further kinds110.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 26 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mkeeper. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,950 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на наш новый инструмент СПП по регионам https://t.me/mkeeper/732 я нашел пользу в этой табличке. видите вот эту страшную строчку, она легко лечится если выставить остатки по ФБС. может это было очевидно, но мне нет) я думал елси мы есть на складе, то всё в шоколаде СПП был только в одном регионе, после добавления остатка по FBS СПП появился и в других регионах. Я кстатит тоже про это не знал) Проверьте у се

5👍4

17 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,560 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Нижний Новгород, 20–21 августа — разберём, что делать дальше Это письмо-приглашение на конфу, где лидеры в разных нишах будут показывать, как они перестраивают бизнесы под текущие условия. Потому что июль ударил по всем: 🚨 Досрочный вывод закрыли. Остатки зависли. Непонятно, грузить или не грузить. ❗️ НО! Спрос на 6+ трлн рублей никуда не делся. Ушла старая модель. И те, у кого был хаос — теряют. Те, у кого систем

👍63👎1

17 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,340 views28 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

СПП по регионам В новом обновлении добавили функционал отслеживания СПП и конечной цены для покупателя в основных регионах. Так же подстроились под обновление рекламной кабинета и панель с функционалом mkeeper больше не пропадает. Инструкция для ручного обновления: https://telegra.ph/Kak-obnovit-rasshirenie-mkeeper-02-06

🔥244

17 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC≈4,700 views22 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Как посмотреть распределение товаров по складам ВБ скрыл информацию по складам в кабинете поставщика и объединил все в "Склад WB", но на покупательском сайте эта информация еще осталась. Посмотреть распределение сколько остатков на каком складе осталось можно на старнице поставщика в разделе "Остатки". Вот видео Уверен что этим данным осталось жить считанные дни, если не часы. Просто на покупательском сайте опасне

🤝127🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈5,690 views128 reactions3 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В новом обновлении добавили в списке рекламных кампаний текущий остаток доступный для заказа покупателем. На лупу открывается расшифровка по складам.

🔥97👍1813

11 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈6,540 views149 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Как мы FBS оптимизировали Исходные данные: Поставщик - производитель деревянных игрушек и детской мебели. До ближайшего СЦ Нижний Новгород (Кудьма) - 200км До 18.07 отгружал на несколько складов: Электросталь, Владимир, Краснодар 4 августа после того как сгорел последний склад во Владимире подключил FBS в ПВЗ в поселке где производство. Заказов не так много, экономически не выгодно возить регулярно на СЦ. Произвел

👍11035💩4

11 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈6,010 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Возгорание, возникшее вследствие атаки на логистические объекты компании в Воронежской области, ликвидировано. На месте продолжают работу пожарные расчеты. На объектах была проведена заблаговременная эвакуация. ❗️Товары преимущественно не пострадали. Прием текущих поставок временно ограничен, они перенаправлены на другие объекты. Пресс-служба РВБ Вот поэтому и писал что нужно дождаться официальных новостей. На п

👍19😁32

11 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC≈6,250 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Повторно атакован склад Воронеж, на этот раз гораздо серьезнее судя по видео( но дождемся официальной информации А я уже опять привык просыпаться и не читать новости что сгорел еще один склад. Некоторые даже поставки по FBO возобновить успели.

😱5👌1

10 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈7,650 views79 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, СПП для цен до 1000 рублей во многих нишах стало 0%😱 Мы такой сценарий в порогах СПП даже не предусмотрели и исключали 0% СПП, сейчас будем корректировать)

😢43💩25🤝7🤯31

6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈8,840 views25 reactionsread 18 August 2026

У многих сегодня пропали панели mkeeper и не загружалась статистика, обновление уже доступно. Плаги обновится автоматически или можете обновить его вручную Актуальная версия 1.28.4 Инструкция по обновлению: https://telegra.ph/Kak-obnovit-rasshirenie-mkeeper-02-06 Так же у некоторых плагин просто отключился, если никакого функционала нет, проверьте включен ли у вас плагин и если нет, включите его

25

4 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈9,490 views79 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Актуальные остатки по поставщику, доступные для заказа В новом разделе на странице поставщика можете посмотреть раскладку по складам по всем товарам поставщика. Можно оценить текущее положение вас и ваших конкурентов. Какую стратегию они выбирают, продолжают грузить на FBO мелкими партиями или переходят на FBS

👍50🔥1410💩2🍾1👀1👎1

4 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈8,020 views60 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Добавили "Пороги СПП" прямо в карточку товара. Данные актуализируем каждые 2 часа Как с ней работать рассказывал в видео https://t.me/mkeeper/722

👍54❤‍🔥42

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @mkeeper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 320,418 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Татьяна Ким
@kimtatyana2024 · 91,354
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Рыжий М.
@redman · 103,139
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Max EVIRMA / Продвижение на Wildberries / LET`S ROCK on WB
@maxprowb · 102,589
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
WB Партнёры
@wbsellerofficial · 183,228
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
На маркетплейсах c Лео Шевченко ️
@namarketplacewithleo · 89,763
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Wildbox.News
@wildbox_news · 88,022
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
Ozon Marketplace
@ozonmarketplace · 102,186
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Основатель mkeeper” (@mkeeper), 22,062 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkeeper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.