Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

По сути

@at_its_core2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,777subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053745309
TypeChannel
Username@at_its_core2
Created1 November 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/at_its_core2

Growth

41,77741,86841,822.56 August 2026 — 41,868 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,864 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,790 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,777 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,763–41,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:5541,777-13
12 Aug 2026, 01:3341,790-11
10 Aug 2026, 22:2141,801-26
9 Aug 2026, 23:3741,827-11
9 Aug 2026, 01:4041,838-18
7 Aug 2026, 23:1141,856-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:0441,864-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:4841,868first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.6%
avg views ÷ 41,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,100
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.733%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (29 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total304,830
Reactions total2,234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,873 reactions across 25 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,82447.1%
🤔92423.9%
👎53213.7%
🤯2917.51%
😢1674.31%
1233.18%
😐120.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,873reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 25 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @at_its_core2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈4,480 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Foreign Policy: Китай становится ключевым каналом для российского СПГ в обход санкций Россия всё активнее перестраивает экспорт сжиженного природного газа вокруг Китая, который становится главным рынком и логистическим узлом для поставок с проектов, находящихся под западными санкциями. Foreign Policy пишет, что Москва создаёт для СПГ систему, похожую на уже работающий нефтяной «теневой флот». Используются суда с не

🤯18🤔9😢5👎1

11 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈9,050 views121 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The Wall Street Journal: Россия создала платёжную систему, которая проводит более $100 млрд в обход санкций В России сформировалась параллельная финансовая инфраструктура, позволяющая компаниям продолжать внешнюю торговлю несмотря на западные санкции. Одним из её ключевых элементов стала платёжная сеть A7, работу которой подробно разбирает The Wall Street Journal. По данным самой компании, через A7 проходит почти 2

👎57👍28🤔18🤯126

10 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈10,600 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Financial Times: Российская армия всё активнее ищет людей для продолжения войны Российским властям становится всё сложнее поддерживать необходимый приток людей в армию, пишет Financial Times. На фоне высоких потерь военкоматы расширяют набор и всё чаще используют методы давления на потенциальных контрактников. С 2026 года военкоматы получили возможность рассылать повестки круглый год. Россиян вызывают для уточнения

🤔51🤯33👍22👎9😢3

9 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈11,500 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Financial Times: Сирия возвращает контроль над ключевыми российскими базами Сирия договорилась с Россией о возвращении под свой контроль двух ключевых российских военных объектов - авиабазы Хмеймим и военно-морской базы в Тартусе. Соглашение было достигнуто после 18 месяцев переговоров и означает заметное сокращение прежней свободы действий Москвы в стране. В течение переходного периода российские военные объекты д

👍69🤔1510👎4

7 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈16,300 views126 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

The Wall Street Journal: Американская разведка допускает ограниченную российскую атаку на страну НАТО Новые оценки американской разведки допускают, что Россия в период с осени 2026 года до 2029 года может попытаться проверить единство НАТО с помощью ограниченной операции против одной из стран альянса. Речь необязательно идёт о полномасштабном вторжении. Среди возможных сценариев рассматриваются крупные кибератаки, г

🤔68🤯3210👍9👎6😢1

5 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈17,300 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Reuters: Россия усиливает кампанию вмешательства в немецкие выборы Россия активизировала дезинформационные операции перед выборами в Берлине, Саксонии-Анхальт и Мекленбурге-Передней Померании, сообщили Reuters источники в немецких структурах безопасности. Кампания направлена преимущественно против политических сил, конкурирующих с правой партией «Альтернатива для Германии». АдГ выступает за восстановление отношений

👎72🤔34👍3🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈16,600 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Reuters: Российская промышленность растёт, но доверие бизнеса упало до минимума с 2020 года Деловая активность в российской промышленности в июле росла максимальными темпами за последние полтора года. Индекс PMI увеличился с 50,3 до 50,7 пункта. Значение выше 50 означает расширение сектора. Производство росло третий месяц подряд, а число новых заказов увеличивалось наиболее быстрыми темпами с мая 2025 года. Основны

🤔58👍224👎3🤯1

1 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈21,400 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Financial Times: Как нефтеперерабатывающая мечта Кремля превратилась в главную уязвимость России Россия годами вкладывала огромные средства в модернизацию нефтеперерабатывающих заводов, стремясь продавать за рубеж не только сырую нефть, но и более дорогие нефтепродукты. Однако теперь сложность построенной Москвой системы становится её слабым местом. Украина сосредоточила удары на технологически важных установках ро

👍71🤔41🤯10😢4👎32

29 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC≈25,200 views196 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Financial Times: Украина меняет тактику ударов по российской энергетике Украина переходит от попыток нанести максимальный ущерб российским нефтеперерабатывающим заводам к точечным ударам по наиболее важным и сложным для замены элементам. Цель новой стратегии - не просто временно остановить предприятие, а вывести его из строя на более длительный срок и значительно увеличить стоимость ремонта. Украинские военные плани

👍127🤔40👎18😢9🤯2

28 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈23,600 views140 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Reuters: Давление на российскую экономику может подтолкнуть Кремль к воздушному перемирию США и Украина обсуждают возможность предложить России ограниченное воздушное перемирие, которое могло бы стать первым шагом к возобновлению мирных переговоров. Речь идёт о прекращении ударов по городам и энергетической инфраструктуре, а не о полной остановке боевых действий. Кремль пока отреагировал осторожно. Дмитрий Песков з

🤔89👍2916👎4🤯2

26 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC≈24,400 views323 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Financial Times: Президент Казахстана публично призвал Кремль заморозить войну Президент Казахстана Касым-Жомарт Токаев во время совместного выступления с президентом РФ предложил заморозить войну и вернуться к переговорам по так называемой «стамбульской формуле 2.0». По его словам, после прекращения боевых действий стороны могли бы двигаться к миру при гарантиях крупнейших держав, включая Россию. Financial Times н

👍285🤔32👎3😢3

24 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈23,200 views204 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The Wall Street Journal: Война начинает разрушать привычную жизнь российского среднего класса На протяжении четырёх лет Кремль старался оградить жителей крупных российских городов от последствий войны. Несмотря на санкции, в стране продолжали продаваться западные смартфоны и другие привычные товары, маркетплейсы работали, а происходящее на фронте для значительной части населения оставалось чем-то далёким. Теперь эта

👍126🤔29😢2711👎8🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @at_its_core2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,068,178 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Генерал СВР
@generalsvr · 281,028
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Блумберг
@bloomeconomy · 370,112
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“По сути” (@at_its_core2), 41,777 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/at_its_core2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.