Channel
@gorodaiodezhda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003889510477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gorodaiodezhda |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 17 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gorodaiodezhda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 26 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 27 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 27 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (17 March 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
31 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 38.7% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 19.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему не хочется писать посты регулярно? Сначала немного вводной информации. Я из тех людей, которые с трудом решаются начать читать новую книгу или смотреть неизвестный фильм. Я из тех, кто, для начала, читает краткое описание и мне плевать на спойлеры. Поэтому я решила, что в своих заметках буду делать краткое содержание: что будет в этом посте. Чтобы, во-первых, вы, как читатели, не тратили свое время на неинте…
👍1
Но вернемся ко вчерашнему дню. За свои почти 33 года я успела найти к себе подход и не насиловать себя, если идея не идет. Я отвлекаюсь на что-то другое, иногда проскартинирую, но закидываю себе в голову задачу. Например, вчерашняя задача была: написать пост. Как правило, через какое-то время, приходит поток. И тут важно - момент, в который приходит поток чаще всего неудобный, например вчера я решила поспать. Но тут …
👍1
Нужна ли во всем этом дисциплина? Чертовски нужна. Это то, чему я намерена научиться на этом этапе жизни. Предыдущие 30 лет мне удавалось успешно избегать этого сложного аспекта жизни, но, чувствую, что качественного скачка в работе, можно достичь только дисциплиной. Отчасти, поэтому я и написала этот пост. Это своего рода манифест для меня, обещание самой себе, вводить в свою жизнь дисциплину. Разумеется, понемногу,…
❤3
Последние несколько лет мир в целом, и мою страну в частности, очень штормит. Сложно сказать кого это не коснулось. Меня это заставило задуматься о будущем моей профессии. По образованию я архитектор, но по роду занятий - дизайнер интерьера. Так вот, на мой взгляд, моя профессия начинает сильно трансформироваться. Начнем с того, что дизайн интерьера - это сфера услуг. Услуги оказывают заказчикам или, правильней ска…
❤3
Делиться классно, когда есть чем Эта мысль обычно приходит ко мне в контексте энергии. Мол, когда ты наполнен - можно и поделиться. Но сегодня Юля Выдолоб мне подкинула другой контекст. В ее лекции был такой тезис: Люди испытывали потребность делиться историями своей жизни всегда. Даже в древности, когда еще не сформировалась письменность. Возможно, наскальная живопись - это первая соцсеть. Неожиданная для меня мысл…
🔥7❤🔥5👏4
Считаю круто очень!
🌙Eburet продолжает удивлять. В этом году бренд презентовал новое направление — интерьерные панели, которые также печатаются с помощью 3D-печати из прочного пластика. Самое прекрасное в этой новинке — почти неограниченный простор для фантазии. Любой цвет, любая степень прозрачности и любой размер (ребята сами конструируют 3D-принтеры, поэтому тут все обсуждаемо). При этом панели могут быть не только декоративными, но…
🔥4
Удивительно, как вычурно и убого может выглядеть величественный, по сути, стиль с неподходящей функцией. И насколько он уместен с правильным наполнением. Этажерки с флаконами выглядят куда вкуснее всей этой столовочной помпезности.
💯2
Как водится, начнем рабочую неделю с кофе и малополезного факта из тех, что особенно приятно узнавать за чашкой кофе. Знали ли вы, что среди множества архитектурных стилей, распространенных на Западе, был один особый, получивший название «коммерческая неоготика»? Мы узнали об этом, когда изучали историю кафетериев «Coles», любимых не одним поколением жителей Австралии. Первый и самый крупный из них - на 1000 посадоч…
🔥1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @gorodaiodezhda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 142,629 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Риторический вопрос” (@gorodaiodezhda), 26 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorodaiodezhda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.