Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Daniël The HealthMan

@danielthehealthman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,564subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745830819
TypeChannel
Username@danielthehealthman
DescriptionGraag geef ik kennis en wijsheid door. Kennis is macht verkrijgen om je eigen gezondheid weer in eigen hand te nemen. Kennis is van en voor iedereen. Warme groet Daniël
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/danielthehealthman

Growth

15,56415,57815,5717 August 2026 — 15,569 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,571 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,578 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,570 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,567 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,566 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,564 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,562–15,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:0515,564-2
12 Aug 2026, 17:5315,566-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:0315,567-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:0515,570-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:1215,573-5
8 Aug 2026, 12:4615,578+7
7 Aug 2026, 09:2215,571+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:3215,569first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 15,564 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held45 (29 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total108,270
Reactions total3,729
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,620
Videos
16
Links
1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,729 reactions across 45 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,02981.2%
👍3268.74%
👏1173.14%
🔥1042.79%
😁852.28%
🥰300.805%
🤩210.563%
🤯70.188%
😢50.134%
😱30.08%
🎉20.054%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,729reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,520 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22😢5🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,500 views58 reactionsread 15 August 2026

De geschiedenis van vaccinatie begint bij kwakzalver Edward Jenner en zijn experimenten met koepokken aan het einde van de achttiende eeuw. Daarbij werd materiaal afkomstig van koepokken doelbewust ingebracht bij een achtjarige jongen, James Phipps. Vanuit onze huidige ethische normen roept zo’n experiment vanzelfsprekend ernstige vragen op, zeker omdat het om een kind ging. Wat mij vooral bezighoudt, is de overtuig

48👍4👏4🔥1🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,410 views52 reactionsread 15 August 2026

De belasting van vaccinaties is enorm. Valt het jullie ook op dat 70% van de bevolking chronisch ziek is? De belasting door vaccinaties lijkt steeds verder toe te nemen. Vooral bij kinderen is dat zichtbaar. Waarom zou een kind dat gezond wordt geboren al op jonge leeftijd worden gevaccineerd, terwijl er op dat moment niets aan de hand is? De zwangerschap verliep goed, de bevalling verliep goed en ook de eerste maan

45👍5👏1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,810 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

46🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,860 views69 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Nieuwe angsten, gezaaide verwarring zorgen ervoor dat de verbinding met jezelf verbroken blijft (allemaal onbewust) waardoor je gemakkelijker manipuleerbaar bent en uiteindelijk fictie niet meer kunt onderscheiden van waarheid. Dat is de reden dat veel mensen kiezen om zich te laten vaccineren, uit angst en de grote leugen van: “je doet het voor de ander”. Zij geloven dit oprecht, hun intentie is dus zuiver. Je kunt

58👍7🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,840 views63 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Blijf liefdevol naar mensen die gevaccineerd zijn. Eigenlijk hebben ze zichzelf laten vaccineren vanuit onschuld, ze denken dat het juist en goed was en daarmee hun medemens konden beschermen. Ze zitten in een staat waar onbewuste angsten regeren waardoor er heel wat feiten vermengd worden wat volgens mij fictie is. Als onbewuste angsten regeren ben je eigenlijk al in een soort overlevingsmodus waarin het overleven p

53🔥7👍3

12 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,990 views66 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

61🔥4👍1

12 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,150 views114 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Van weerstand naar waarheid, hoe je je denken transformeert. Voor veel mensen klinken uitspraken als “Ik ben succesvol”, “Ik heb geld”, “Ik ben geliefd” of “Ik ben gezond” als leugens. nZe voelen: “Ik houd mezelf voor de gek.” En dat is begrijpelijk. Want als de uiterlijke omstandigheden nog het tegenovergestelde lijken te tonen, roept zo’n affirmatie innerlijk verzet op. Je voelt het verschil tussen wat je zegt en

102🔥6👍5👏1

12 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,960 views81 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Stop met willen, begin met zijn. De kracht van woorden. Veel mensen stellen zich de vraag: "Waarom heb ik niet meer succes?" Maar sta even stil bij de woorden die je uitspreekt. Wat je eigenlijk zegt, is: "Ik wil succes." En het universum antwoordt: "Oké, dat wíl je." Besef dit goed: het woord ‘ik’ is de startsleutel van de motor van creatie. Zodra je ‘ik ben’ uitspreekt, het Griekse ego, zend je een krachtig bevel

76👍2🔥2😱1

11 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,110 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

62👍2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,140 views74 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Arnica montana is daar voor mij een prachtig voorbeeld van: een eenvoudige gele bloem uit de bergen die de mens al generaties lang begeleidt bij vallen, stoten, kneuzingen en pijn. Niet om het genezingsproces van het lichaam over te nemen, maar om het te ondersteunen terwijl het lichaam doet waar het van nature zo bijzonder goed in is: zichzelf herstellen.

68👍4👏1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,070 views75 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Arnica montana: het krachtige valkruid uit de natuur. Zoals altijd heeft de natuur veel voor ons in huis. Eén van die bijzondere planten is Arnica montana, een prachtige gele bergplant die van nature voorkomt in bergachtige gebieden van Europa en West-Azië. Het is een plant met een enorme kracht die al eeuwenlang wordt gebruikt bij kneuzingen, blauwe plekken, verstuikingen, spierpijnen en pijnlijke gewrichten. Arnic

67👍5👏2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @danielthehealthman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 240,627 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daniël The HealthMan” (@danielthehealthman), 15,564 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danielthehealthman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.