IELTS Academy pinned a photo

Channel
IELTS Academy
@IELTS_8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,471subscribers
+1,696 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001183153058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IELTS_8 |
| Description | 👤 Contact & Ads: @nae0110 ORIGINAL CONTENT ❗ Beyond plagiarism Since 2019 |
| Created | 18 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IELTS_8 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 57,471 | +19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 57,452 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:21 | 57,459 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 57,460 | +12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:40 | 57,448 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 57,450 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:10 | 57,455 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:49 | 57,457 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:49 | 57,458 | -30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 57,488 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 57,504 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 57,509 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 57,517 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 57,511 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 57,513 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 57,535 | -55 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:06 | 57,590 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:45 | 57,595 | +20 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 57,575 | +38 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 57,537 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.0%
- avg views ÷ 57,471 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,060
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.647%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (13 March 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 56,430 |
| Reactions total | 365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 191
- Videos
- 591
- Links
- 893
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,090 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 800 | 38.3% | |
| ❤ | 745 | 35.6% | |
| 🔥 | 218 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 108 | 5.17% | |
| 🐳 | 39 | 1.87% | |
| 💯 | 38 | 1.82% | |
| 🎉 | 37 | 1.77% | |
| 👌 | 37 | 1.77% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 0.574% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 0.574% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 0.526% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.383% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.287% | |
| 🆒 | 6 | 0.287% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.287% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.191% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.096% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.048% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,090 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IELTS_8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔖 400 Phrasal Verbs For IELTS 🎁 ✅ 400 most common phrasal verbs by Collins ✅ 25 topic units with exercises & answers 📥 Full file attached - save and share it now 👇 React so we know what to send next: 👍 - More materials like this 🔥 - Need this before my exam 💯 - Sharing with my study group 😎 by @IELTS_8
👍34❤27🔥10💯5👌3🐳1😍1
🎤 Birinchi Speaking mock — BEPUL Speaking Mock — real examiner bilan jonli IELTS Speaking mock. Google Meet orqali 20 daqiqa, natija — 4 mezon bo'yicha band score. 🎁 Promokod: SPMOCK Birinchi sessiyangiz 0 so'm. Faqat birinchi 50 ta sessiya uchun, har bir o'quvchiga bir marta. Keyingi sessiyalar — 50 000 so'm, Click orqali. O'QUVCHILARGA - Examiner va qulay vaqtni o'zingiz tanlaysiz - Part 1 → 2 → 3, xuddi imtiho…
❤6🔥2🐳1
Hi everyone!! Thank you so much for joining today’s session! 🥰 I’ll put together a summary of today’s lesson, including the key tips, frameworks, and strategies we discussed, and share it here in the chat later! I hope you found the session helpful, and thank you again for participating! 💗
❤16🔥8👌4🤣3🎉1👏1🤩1🆒1
Crystal’s free IELTS lesson is done ✅ How was it? Tell us in the comments 👇 🚀 Want to keep studying with Crystal? ✍️ DM @nae0110 ⚠️ Spots are limited
❤9🎉4🔥4🤣2🐳1👏1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤22👍5💋1
🎓FREE IELTS LESSON ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 👩🏫 Meet Crystal - IELTS 8.5 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Stuck at 6.0 or 6.5 and don't know why? 🤔 Crystal will show you exactly what she did differently 💡 In 1 lesson you'll learn: 🔑 How she got a perfect 9.0 in Listening & Reading 🚫 The mistakes that quietly cost you 0.5–1 band 💬 Answers to YOUR questions, live ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🗓 Saturday, 24 October ⏰ 16:00 (Tashkent/Astana) 💻 Live Stream · F…
❤20👌3👏2👍1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 9️⃣🔤0️⃣ or Flying Tesla?🚀
🤣103👍26❤18🔥12🍾4🏆2
🔥 FREE IELTS LESSON 🔥 👩🏫 Tutor: Angela 🏆IELTS Overall Band: 8.5 🎧 Listening: 8.5 📖 Reading: 8.5 ✍️ Writing: 7.5 🗣 Speaking: 8.5 🗓Thursday, October 8 ⏰ 16:00 (Tashkent/Astana Time) 💻 Online via Google Meet What you'll get: ⚡️ The common mistakes that cost you 0.5–1 band ⚡️ Exam strategies that actually work ⚡️ Live Q&A with the tutor 🎯 Perfect for students aiming for 6.0 / 6.5 / 7.0 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎟 HOW TO GET …
❤32👍5🎉3🔥3👌2💘1
📚 400 Idioms & Collocations For IELTS 🎁 ✅ 200 idioms for natural Speaking ✅ 200 collocations for high-band Writing & Speaking 📥 Full file attached - save and share it now 👇 React so we know what to send next: 👍 - More materials like this 🔥 - Need this before my exam 💯 - Sharing with my study group 😎 by @IELTS_8
👍60❤33💯13🔥9🎉1🐳1💋1
🎯 500 Advanced Words for IELTS ✅ These are the words that show up in high-band Speaking and Writing answers - learn them and it shows. 📝 Full list is attached above - save it now. 👇 React so we know what to send next: 👍 - More vocabulary like this 🔥 - Need this before my exam 💯 - Sharing with my study group 😎 by @IELTS_8
❤53👍30🔥9💯7🐳2🎉1
🎯 GetYour9 - Improve your IELTS band score - FREE, right now • Full mocks + band reports for all 4 skills • Writing Task 1 & 2 checker • AI examiner for Speaking • AI tracks which question types you keep getting wrong - then you practice exactly those 👇 React so I know who wants in: 👍- Send me the link 🔥 - My exam is soon, I need this 🎉 - Sharing with my study group 🤫 (P.S check comments) 😎 dm @nae0110
👍141🔥37❤34🎉6🐳3👏2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @IELTS_8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@IELTS_8 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 23 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @IELTS_8 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 8 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 How old are you?
- 🐣 Under 157%
- 🎒 15 - 1718%
- 🚀 17 - 1813%
- 🧠 18 - 2016%
- 💼 20+47%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@IELTSprint · 9849 postsIngliz tilida so'zlashish
@ingiliz_tilida_s · 12,7659 postsABITURIYENTLAR 🎓 | Majburiy fanlar | Imtihon Savollari va Javoblari
@ABITURIYENTLARI · 68,4448 postsISH REJALAR | E BAZA | HUJJATLAR
@E_BAZA_ISH_REJALAR_Pedkadr_tdi · 59,0658 postsE BAZA | ISH REJALAR | Imtihon Savollari
@E_BAZA_ISH_REJALAR · 28,4126 postsNUcleus
@nucleus_borziyon · 6,8006 postsO'qituvchi | Ish Rejalar | E Baza | Imtihon Savollari va Javoblari
@Oqituvchi · 87,4395 postsEnglish songs | Inglizcha qo'shiqlar
@English_songs_Inglizcha_qoshiqla · 8,1203 postsTALABALAR 🎓 | Ish Reja | Abituriyentlar | Imtihon Savollari va Javoblari
@Talabalar_Talaba_uz · 6,6852 postsFER.IELTS.READING
@ACtualreadingtests · 171 postEngchannel
@channelforlearners · 11 postEnglish with me🇺🇲🇬🇧🇭🇲
@englishwith_neo · 31 postLIFE reports/Отрезки из жизни
@ieltsenglishblog · 21 postIELTS - 9™ REKLAMA ✅
@IELTSrek · 1031 postINGLIZ TILI GRAMMATIKASI
@Ingliz_tili_grammatikasi · 2,9251 postIngliz Tili | IELTS
@Ingliz_tili_IELTS_1 · 3,5041 postEnglish with MexxeM🚀
@mexxem_Channel · 91 postOlimpiadalar | Sovrinli Olimpiadalar 📋
@olimpiadalari · 3,0881 postSky
@rajabov_vlog · 41 postملفات المرحلة الثالثة
@thirdstudents3 · 1,1851 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Writing_Essays_Band9 · 59,335#1
@ieltswithsanokulov · 53,193#2
@mindless_writer · 84,748#3
@cambridgeIELTSbooks · 5,169#4
@ozodbek_sk · 10#5
@IELTSly · 3,490#6
@ielts_atabaev · 17,855#7
@IELTSwMasters · 108,194#8
@Dilmurod_nazarmatov · 6,395#9
@IELTSFasTrack · 85,064#10
@topic_based_vocabulary · 24,051#11
@ielts_assistants · 20,867#12
@mrjohnsieltsblog · 579#13
@CHRIS_PELL_IELTS_ADVANTAGE · 8,344#14
@articles_in_English · 62,224#15
@irinalutsenko · 5,066#16
@emuallimm · 2,048#17
@Podcastant · 13,734#18
@mardonsabaraliyev · 2,271#19
@Khusan57 · 96,932#20
@alisherposts · 29,402#21
@BekzodMirahmedov · 42,568#22
@cdireport · 47,205#23
@RS_IELTS · 129,527#24
@aslanovs_library · 23#25
@ieltsaidbydilshodbek · 24,672#26
@jakhongir_ielts_9 · 40,963#27
@Road_Podcast · 93,992#28
@RECENT_IELTS · 17,357#29
@Siroj_Notes · 42,943#30
@ulugbekumidjonov · 10,578#31
@Aslanovs_Lessons · 11,910#32
@ieltsmates_results · 6,790#33
@thompson_english · 11,273#34
@shadowing_podcasts · 36,288#35
@RiteUp · 3,675#36
@AsilbekYusupov · 9,725#37
@AlexNativeIELTS · 19,149#38
@IELTSwithRixsitilla · 9,802#39
@collegeapplication3 · 1,507#40
@inglizeey · 4,391#41
@BBCs_6MinuteEnglish · 185,480#42
@online_academy_iteacher · 5,529#43
@British_Council_Uz · 19,652#44
@ad_astra_school · 7,178#45
@OlimjonsWriting · 2,743#46
@Abrors_IELTS · 4,647#47
@OlimjonsSpeaking · 2,833#48
@realexamielts · 33,727#49
@muxtasar_english · 59,251#50
@daily_tedtalks · 45,158#51
@everestofficial · 37,542#52
@Michael_Blog · 11,534#53
@articles365 · 85,162#54
@ieltszone_uz · 42,467#55
@grantlar · 79,399#56
@xushnudbek · 754,128#57
@barnomukimova_official · 32,787#58
@shoxruxbekolimov · 54,726#59
@MultiLevelRecord · 222,963#60
@NazirRashidov · 604#61
@ielts_thematic_tests · 63,102#62
@BobirjonsThoughts · 15,769#63
@internationUZ · 10,826#64
@examsuz · 23,437#65
@IELTS_PAPERS · 2,263#66
@tutorbekhruz · 4,564#67
@linguabarno · 56,008#68
@OlimjonsReading · 5,415#69
@USAUzbekistan · 29,452#70
@elyurtumidifoundation · 32,815#71
@LinguistaMe96 · 2,099#72
@alisher_sadullaev · 221,129#73
@ibratfarzandlari · 112,889#74
@ielts9_reading_listening · 18,696#75
@barno_muqimovaa · 7,067#76
@ibragimmansurov_blog · 56,999#77
@AbrorRahmatullayev · 156,970#78
@Abdurazzoq_IELTS · 24,596#79
@cambridge_learning_center · 20,218#80
@ustozation · 35,451#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IELTSmaterials_N1 · 32,699
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
@Writing_Essays_Band9 · 59,335
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@IELTSwMasters · 108,194
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@IELTSFasTrack · 85,064
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
@elviranmalik · 51,232
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
@aslanovs_library · 23
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
@ieltsxpressdotcom · 20,777
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@RORYIELTS · 46,071
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS Academy” (@IELTS_8), 57,471 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IELTS_8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.