Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NASA News

Channel

NASA News

@Nasa_News

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,657subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001037915588
TypeChannel
Username@Nasa_News
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nasa_News

Growth

2,6322,6572,644.55 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,634 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,651 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,653 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,654 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,649 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,657 subscribers5 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,628–2,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 01:142,657+8
26 Aug 2026, 05:182,649-5
23 Aug 2026, 02:122,654+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:472,653+2
16 Aug 2026, 05:372,651+18
12 Aug 2026, 12:382,633-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:212,634+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:002,633+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:202,632no change
5 Aug 2026, 18:452,632first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.79%
avg views ÷ 2,657 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held34 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total42
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1292.3%
🔥17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026

#NewPhoto from #Nasa: "NASA's IXPE Studies Magnetar" A first of its kind measurement of a magnetar may have captured empty space behaving in a way physicists have predicted for 90 years, but never directly observed. The results published Wednesday in Nature. [August 7, 2026 at 02:00AM] https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ixpemagnetarartistsconcept-web.png

7 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "NASA’s IXPE Studies Magnetar" Scientists using NASA’s IXPE (Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer) conducted more than 140 hours of observations of the magnetar 1E 1547-5408, shown in this Aug. 5, 2026, artist’s concept, between March and April 2025. In doing so, they may have captured empty space behaving in a way physicists have predicted for 90 years, but never directly […] [Aug

7 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "APOD: 2026 August 7 – Rubin’s Cosmos Field" APOD Science APOD APOD: 2026 August 7 –… Today’s APOD Archive Submissions Index Search Calendar RSS Education About Discuss APOD Astronomy Picture of the Day Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer. Rubin’s COS

1

7 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "Sensing the Poles’ Hidden Heat" New animations from NASA’s PREFIRE mission reveal two years of seasonal temperature swings at the Arctic and Antarctic. [August 7, 2026 at 02:00AM] Read more here: https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/sensing-the-poles-hidden-heat/

2

7 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "NASA’s Lunar Development and Test Facility Prepares Artemis Hardware for Moon " Before astronauts return to the Moon’s surface through NASA’s Artemis program, the hardware they depend on must first prove it can survive the unforgiving lunar environment. At NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, engineers at the Lunar Development and Test Facility are tackling one o

1

7 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#NewImage from #Nasa: "Rubin's COSMOS Field" There are more than half a million galaxies in the central panel of this image from the NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Chile. This is the COSMOS field, a patch of sky several times larger than the full moon, first observed by Hubble. It has also been observed by Webb and other telescopes because it contains comparatively few bright stars from our own galaxy, offering

1

6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "NASA’s SkyFall Helicopters at Work (Artist’s Concept)" Description This artist’s concept depicts NASA’s three SkyFall Mars helicopters collecting data while flying over the surface of the Red Planet. The green frequency waves emanating from the helicopters’ large antennas depict collection of subsurface radar data. The red beams depict collect near-infrared imagery data from regolith (crus

1

6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "Antenna Testing for NASA’s SkyFall Mission" Description SkyFall ground-penetrating radar engineer Maya Román connects a coaxial cable to a test antenna in the Environmental Test Lab’s electromagnetic interference testing chamber at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California. The antenna was pointed up during test to minimize reflections and interferences with the antenna patte

1

6 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "I Am Artemis Tom Percy" As NASA sets its sights on long-term exploration of the Moon and Mars, the agency is increasing the cadence of its Artemis missions. Helping bring these plans to fruition is Tom Percy, manager of systems engineering and integration for NASA’s Human Landing System Program. Percy serves as a focal point in working with providers SpaceX […] [August 6, 2026 at 02:0

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026

#NewPhoto from #Nasa: "Taking Flight to Prepare for Space" NASA astronaut candidate Adam Fuhrmann prepares for a training flight aboard NASA’s WB-57 aircraft. [August 6, 2026 at 02:00AM] https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/55412014375-711b8f02f7-o.jpg

6 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#BreakingNews from #Nasa: "Taking Flight to Prepare for Space" NASA astronaut Adam Fuhrmann (right, in yellow) prepares for a training flight aboard NASA’s WB-57 aircraft in this July 16, 2026, photo. These high-altitude flights train the crew to work in a tight environment and operate aircraft systems while in a pressure suit, preparing them for future missions to the International Space Station, Moon, or […]

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @Nasa_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apod_telegram · 35,104
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Physics
@physics · 33,245
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NASA News” (@Nasa_News), 2,657 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nasa_News.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.