Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Astronomy Learners

@spacemathsphysicslearners

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,901subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425196714
TypeChannel
Username@spacemathsphysicslearners
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spacemathsphysicslearners

Growth

2,8982,9012,899.57 August 2026 — 2,898 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,900 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,901 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,898–2,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:132,901+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:472,900+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:322,898first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 2,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
921
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.478%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held19 (5 January 202625 July 2026)
Views total4,606
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7129.5%
6727.8%
💔156.22%
145.81%
🎉135.39%
😭135.39%
🤓135.39%
❤‍🔥83.32%
🎅83.32%
👍52.07%
🤔52.07%
🐳31.24%
🌚20.83%
🎄20.83%
🕊10.415%
🥴10.415%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC731 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Sometimes it's ok to let go" 😂😂

🎉11

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

21 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC875 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A pretty superficial post just to provide initial context

1

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

21 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC861 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

It is said that the curl of a gradient is 0 or specifically: ∇ x (∇T) = 0 This also shows that energy is conserved mathematically... Then why is the Noether's theorems required?

2

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

18 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC989 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ok guys explain to me what a tensor is...

🤔5

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

16 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈1,150 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

3

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

12 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,390 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A historic sweep for the Indian IPhO 2026 team, with all 5 members getting a gold. Congratulations team India and join me in congratulating one of the gold medalists, @RiddheshAB7... Moving on to the International Mathematical Olympiad 2026, which is being held in China! All the best to team India and the world. Lets hope for some of the best problems to come on the 15th and the 16th July 2026...

🔥246🎉1🐳1🥴1

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

26 Jun 2026, 11:34 UTC≈3,720 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The cosmological principal states that on a large scale, the universe is homogeneous (uniform in density) and isotropic (looks the same in all directions). This is a crucial fundamental assumption by astronomers and cosmologists, which provide many shortcuts in studying the universe. For example, physical laws which apply locally, apply universaly as well... We do not need to derive new laws of physics for every dis

🎅82👍1🕊1

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

23 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,590 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We're back

12❤‍🔥81💔1

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

16 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC≈3,700 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Telegram is banned in India until June 22, 2026. Looking at the harsh conditions of Telegram in India and obviously the incapability of the government in conducting national exams, telegram may face permanent ban at any moment. This audience is very dear to me and I wouldn't like to lose you all. So I would request you to subscribe to my YT channel, so that we can shift there, if TG is ever banned... https://www.yo

😭13🎉1

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

26 May 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,320 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Sun radiates energy continuously into cold space at temperature ∼3K, yet its core remains at roughly 1.5×10^7 K for billions of years. A naive thermodynamic argument says: “Hot objects lose heat, therefore they should cool.” However, stars do not behave like ordinary systems. Explain why a star can radiate enormous amounts of energy for billions of years without catastrophic cooling, and why, during some phases o

🤓13👍21

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

24 May 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,030 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I was ofc checking you guys! The real answer is 0.1 Mpc. Hubble's law won't work here because the universe isn't isotropic and homogenous throughout... Considering the galaxy is a milky Way satellite, the only possible distance is 0.1 Mpc... Get skills ppl

💔12

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

23 May 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,960 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

The redshift of the Carina Dwarf Galaxy(a Milky Way satellite) is z=0.00077. The distance to the galaxy is?

  1. 3.3 Mpc35%
  2. 0.1 Mpc10%
  3. 1.1 Mpc30%
  4. 20 Mpc25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

Signed Mλthεmλt1cλl Λrcεμs

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @spacemathsphysicslearners. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 May 2026, 17:04 UTCFinal Results60 voters

The redshift of the Carina Dwarf Galaxy(a Milky Way satellite) is z=0.00077. The distance to the galaxy is?

  1. 3.3 Mpc35%
  2. 0.1 Mpc10%
  3. 1.1 Mpc30%
  4. 20 Mpc25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 May 2026, 16:38 UTCFinal Results121 voters

In stellar cores, nuclear fusion occurs at temperatures that are far lower than what would be required for nuclei to classically overcome the Coulomb barrier. Which of the following best explains how fusion is still able to proceed under these conditions?

  1. Thermal collisions always provide sufficient energy to overcome electrostatic repulsion.26%
  2. High densities eliminate the Coulomb force between nuclei.24%
  3. Quantum tunneling lets nuclei penetrate the Coulomb barrier if their kinetic energy is insufficient.31%
  4. Strong nuclear force acts at large distances in stellar interiors, reducing the barrier..19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SCIENCE QUIZ 🧬🧪⚗️
@science_qq · 152,477
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Current GK Quiz SSC CGL GD UPSC
@SSC_CGL_GD_quiz_gk_current_upsc · 175,384
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Astronomy Learners” (@spacemathsphysicslearners), 2,901 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spacemathsphysicslearners.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.