National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 52 days, net +4,319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,650–32,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 02:39
31,784
+1,303
17 Sept 2026, 15:00
30,481
+226
15 Sept 2026, 12:16
30,255
+230
13 Sept 2026, 22:19
30,025
+374
12 Sept 2026, 05:39
29,651
+837
9 Sept 2026, 23:38
28,814
+1,023
6 Sept 2026, 14:40
27,791
+437
4 Sept 2026, 05:37
27,354
+34
2 Sept 2026, 18:39
27,320
-12
1 Sept 2026, 14:54
27,332
-27
31 Aug 2026, 13:54
27,359
-13
30 Aug 2026, 12:25
27,372
-4
29 Aug 2026, 09:56
27,376
-9
27 Aug 2026, 05:06
27,385
-7
26 Aug 2026, 06:54
27,392
-1
25 Aug 2026, 07:58
27,393
-13
24 Aug 2026, 06:54
27,406
-12
22 Aug 2026, 15:23
27,418
-8
21 Aug 2026, 07:54
27,426
-14
20 Aug 2026, 08:15
27,440
first reading
Engagement
206 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 31,784 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,020
189 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
189
of 206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
206 (16 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
1,705,342
Reactions total
38,311
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,500
Videos
≈1,280
Links
≈17,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 43s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42,513 reactions across 206 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
9,977
23.5%
👍
8,843
20.8%
🔥
8,547
20.1%
❤
8,127
19.1%
🤔
1,809
4.26%
🤪
914
2.15%
💔
910
2.14%
💯
668
1.57%
😢
467
1.10%
😱
397
0.934%
🫡
353
0.83%
😭
167
0.393%
👏
166
0.39%
😨
164
0.386%
🤯
161
0.379%
🤨
107
0.252%
🌚
104
0.245%
😈
81
0.191%
🤩
75
0.176%
🥰
68
0.16%
22 further kinds
408
0.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 206 of the 206 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 206 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alnasiali. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 206 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
استهدف معسكر قياده قوات #درع_الوطن في منطقة القعوه قرب بني بحر على الحدود الشرقية لمديرية المضاربه وراس العارة لحج بصاروخ بالستي صباح اليوم ادى الاستهداف لسقوط مايقارب20جندي وضابط مابين شهيد وجريح
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1KXYAqgKCL/
عثر مواطنين في #مارب على جثة تم لفها داخل غطاء بلاستيكي(شراع) والقيت في منطقة المعبال قرب الخط الدولي بمديرية الوادي #مارب وتبين ان الجثة هي للمواطن/عبدالواسع علي ناجي الصباري احد أبناء محافظة صنعاء ولم يتم التعرف على هوية الجناه او الأسباب وراء الحادثه
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DfKbsnmjK/
قام عدد من انصار #الانتقالي اليوم بمنع طاقم قناة الجنوب من إجراء مقابلات مع المواطنين في رصد في يافع بمحافظة #أبين دون معرفة السبب
هذا وعاد طاقم قناة الجنوب إلى إجراء المقابلات في السوق عقب تدخل قوات الأمن العام وانسحاب الانتقالي من السوق
#علي_النسي
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0fwKv9yQYQpdBHBAsfjgWY64vD5XfdMiNnKYA3J8pxhji3JnV4qFq4wLf3k1L9XMUl&id=61572912338531&mibextid=CDWPTG
أطلق مستشفى عدن الخيري في المنصورة #عدن نداء عاجل للتبرع بالدم فصائل B+ و B- لإنقاذ حياة الجرحى المحتاجين للدم بشكل عاجل
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1KG4sJ3x1v/
هل تعلم ان قوات الفرقة الثانية عمالقة جنوبية كان عددهم 3000 فرد الان اصبح عددهم 270 فرد فقط
قلت لكم....الرياض لن تنسى كل من شارك ودعم وبارك تقدم #المجلس_الانتقالي_الجنوبي في #حضرموت وستقوم بالتخلص منهم واحد تلو الاخر سواء بالعزل او استنزاف قواته
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19mHobJcP5/
يدفع المجلس الرئاسي شهريا110الف دولار لشركة علاقات ضغط يترأسها مايكل بيتروتسيلو في أمريكا وذلك لتحسين صورة المجلس أمام صناع القرار والإعلام الأمريكي
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ErZZb42eL/
#هلاليات
من السهل أن تبدأ الحرب....ولكن من الصعب انهاؤها
فلا تخض معركة إلا إذا كنت تملك القرارين.......قرار الحرب....وقرار السلام
ولنا لقاء
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1dMrKQms8Z/
زيارة منصور بن زايد غدا للسعوديةبعد يوم واحد فقط من زيارة النتن.ياهو للإمارات لها دلالات على حدوث أمور خطيره مستقبلا اقلها سوداويه هي ولادة تحالف سعودي إسرائيلي لكي تستمر #الرياض في حربها باليمن
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EPwXXEDpn/
تعيين فضل الشعيبي شقيق يحيى الشعيبي في بعثة الجمهورية اليمنية في نيويورك بالامس وهو من خارج السلك الدبلوماسي
واليوم تم تعيين لينا علي شايع شقيقة القيادي/شلال علي شايع بدرجة مستشار في سفارة الجمهورية اليمنية في لندن بقرار مباشر من رئيس الوزراء وهي ليست تعمل بالسلك الدبلوماسي
وفي الاخير تهمل الكوادر اليمنيه الجنوبيه بذريعة انه تم تعيين عدد كبير منهم في الخارجية
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18HUKXV5qY…
ماكانوا في جبل سيف ولا حوله ياقناة اليمن اليوم!!!!
والحقيقة من سيطر على جبل البازله سيسيطر على جبل سيف ومحيطه بالكامل
وسلامتكم....
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BnPmhJj3X/
الأجدر على المحافظين والوزراء ان يكونوا اول من يلبي دعوة النفير العام ويعودون الا اليمن كأقل مجهود ليكونوا مثلا اعلى للمواطن وقود هذه الحرب....
اما اجتماعات الزووم ومجموعات الواتساب لاتعيد الأوطان ولاتحسم معارك....
#علي_النسي
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Dg8pVYqWj/
🤣168👍27❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 206 posts we hold for @alnasiali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
جامعة القرآن الكريم والعلوم الاكاديمية @Alqurankarym12 · 22,765#73
جامعة القرآن الكريم والعلوم الأكاديمية إجابات وحل التكاليف والأنشطة . @Alqurankary5 · 5,025#74
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
جامعة القرآن الكريم والعلوم الأكاديمية📚 @MAlqurankarym102 · 22,657 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
منصة صدق اليمنية @SidqYem · 39,411 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
النبأ @Naba_yem · 40,475 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
قناة الشاعر أمين الجوفي الرسمية @AminAljofe · 34,788 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
محمد علي الحوثي @Mohammadlhouthi · 32,476 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
محمد عبدالسلام الناطق الرسمي لانصار الله @abdulsalamsalah · 33,354 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
اتحاد الشعراء والمنشدين الرسمية @UnionofPoetsandMinstrels · 28,063 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
قناة الفلكي محمد عياش @MohammedAyash0 · 29,821 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
الدكتور أحمد مطهر الشامي @DrAhmedAlshami · 22,366 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026
نصر الدين عامر @Nasr_Amer1 · 37,347 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
الاركويش الاخبارية @alarkushalakbaryah · 22,604 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
شبكة الفرقان @alforgan_net · 32,126 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
زوامل وأناشيد أنصار الله @Zwaml100 · 26,730 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة الفلكي اليمني الجوبي @ahmedaljoby55 · 51,633 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
عيسى الليث - Issa Allaith @IssaAllaith · 104,992 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
💠 قناة حسن الهادي - برنامج رجال الله 💠 @Hassen_Al_hadi · 31,052 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
بقش Boqash @BoqashEcon · 39,406 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
مأرب برس @marebpress1 · 21,434 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
زوامل عيسى الليث @zoamlAllaith · 24,479 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
أخبار الصرافة اليمنية @NewsExchange · 33,482 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
قناة الشهيد طه المداني @AbuHasanAlMadani · 21,616 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 September 2026
️ قناة الشاعر صقر اللاحجي الرسمية️ @saqerallahji12 · 21,985 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 September 2026
زوامل عدي السفياني الرسمية @OdayAlsoviani · 74,088 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
حسين الطير @Hussein_Altair · 21,460 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علي النسي” (@alnasiali), 31,784 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alnasiali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.