Channel
@AminAljofe
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,395subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001194930315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AminAljofe |
| Description | مواطن يمني ضد العدوان |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AminAljofe |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @AminAljofe/2238 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC | @AminAlljofe/78513 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC | 1.00 | 67 minutes |
| @AminAljofe/2241 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC | @AminAlljofe/78715 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC | 1.00 | 40 hours |
| @AminAljofe/2243 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC | @AminAlljofe/78915 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC | 1.00 | 40 hours |
| @AminAljofe/2244 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC | @AminAlljofe/79015 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC | 1.00 | 39 hours |
| @AminAljofe/2245 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC | @AminAlljofe/79116 Jul 2026, 22:29 UTC | 1.00 | 28 hours |
| @AminAljofe/2246 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC | @AminAlljofe/79216 Jul 2026, 22:29 UTC | 1.00 | 27 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @AminAlljofe | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 27 hours | this entry (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AminAljofe — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 34,395 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 34,401 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 34,391 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 34,394 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 34,393 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 34,392 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 34,393 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 34,404 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 34,413 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 34,413 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 111,370 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
عــاد بـنك اهـدافنا فــ الـبدايـة وانــت بـنـك اهـدافـك انـهيتها والـمـديـنـة واجـهـتـها مــرايـة كـــل مـــا شـديـتـها ارخـيـتـها مــا نـفع بـرج الـمطار الـحماية يــا تــرى كــم رحـلـة الـغيتهـا؟ والـسـفن لا مـا مـعـاها عـبـاية فـالــولـيـة ســتــرهــا بــيـتـهـا والمصافي ضمن مقصد وغاية كـــل مـــا طـفـيـتها الـصـيـتها عـقد كـامل وانـت يا جولة آية والامــاكــن عــكــس مـريـتـهـا والـوصاية خـل حـلم الوصاية لــو…
Video, posted without a caption
نشكر كل من واسانا وقدَّم لنا التعازي في وفاة والدنا، سواءً بالحضور، أو بالاتصال، أو عبر الرسائل النصية، أو عبر وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي. كما نلتمس العذر ممّن لم يتمكن من الحضور، ونسأل الله العلي القدير أن يتغمد فقيدنا بواسع رحمته ومغفرته، وأن يجزي الجميع خير الجزاء، وألَّا يريهم مكروهًا في عزيز لديهم.
سيشيع جثمان والدي رحمه الله غداً الساعة العاشرة صباحاً، بعد الصلاة عليه في جامع الصبيرة بمدينة رداع، وسيوارى جثمانه الثرى في مقبرة حزيز برداع تغمده الله بواسع الرحمة والمغفرة، وإنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون، وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل.
إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون. انتقل إلى رحمة الله والدي الغالي، أسأل الله أن يرحمه ويغفر له ويسكنه فسيح جناته.
تشرق على الباغين شمس المصافي الـساعة اربـع قبل ما تشرق الشمس تـسـلـم يـمـين الـفـرط والله يـعـافي الـمؤمن الـصنبيح ذي شـابك اللمس اتــوكـل الـمـبـروك والــجـو صــافـي واتـلـوثت مــن بـعد مـا هـسَّها هـس وكــهـربـا يــنـبـع وجــيـزان طــافـي وافــراد بـاتـريوت زجُّـوهم الـحبس وشـحـبـت فـيـهـا حـلـوق الـمـطافي فـي حـين لا تـسمع لـحكّامها هـمس ذي مـا فـهم بالدرس والدرس كافي نـعيد لـه فـي شرح تفصيلي الدرس والشوط ذا…
مشهد تاريخي
الـقـيـادة وجَّـهـت والـشـعب لــبَّـىٰ والمشاهد تـرجمت نصَّ الـخطـاب شعب شامخ محتزم غاضب معبَّىٰ كــره يـزفـر غـيظ قـد هـو لـلرقاب مـحتزم بـالجيش ذي لا هــبَّ هَـبَّىٰ بــا يـجـي لـلـمعركة مـن كـل بــاب بــا تــربِّـي ضـربـته ذي مــا تـربَّــىٰ وبـا يـلـبِّي دعـوتـه شـيـبه وشــاب بـــا يــخَـرِّج لـلمطـارات الـمـخـبَّـىٰ وبـا يـهَّلِج فـرطهن خشم السـحاب وبـا يرحِّل كـل غـازي وغـد غصبىٰ وبـا يـمـرِّغ أنـف جـيشه ف…
قــولـوا لـحـاضرنا يـقـل لـلـغايب وكــل صـاحـب يـهـتري بـصحابه معاد شي حاسب وانا بـ احاسب كـم ذا وهـي تحسب لنا الحسابة لا الـهـدنـة أوت للـمواطن راتــب ولا ســلـمـنـا جـــارنــا وإرهــابــه والـحـل مـن رائـيي وراي الـغالب تـقـرح وهــي حـل الـبلا واسـبابه والـجـيش يـتـوكل يـحـرر مـأرب والفرط يحرق في بقيق اعصابه واحــنـا مـعـانـا الله والله غـالـب والـحـرب ثــم الـحرب يـا شـبابه #أمين_الجوفي
قــبـائل الـبـيـضـاء قــبـائـل وافــيـة دائـم مدىٰ الـتاريخ مـوقفها شـريف فـي مـدحها الـهاجس عجز والقافية مـن عهد الأشتر مالها موقف ضعيف تـدعـس عـلـى حـد الـخناجر حـافية وفــ الـوغىٰ مـا ذي يخوفها مخـيف فـــي الــمـعـارك زافـيـتـهـا زافــيــة وسـيـلها لا عـج تـسـمع لــه رجـيـف مــا هــزهــم مــوســاد ولا مَــافِــيَـه ولا الوطن بـاعوه فـي كـسرة رغيف عـــن الــرُقـاد اجـنـوبـهم مـتـجـافية تحمي صروح الهدي والدين …
كلمة رشاد العليمي مخيبة للأمال والطموحات من ماقالوه عنه مرتزقة الريال السعودي بعد سماعهم كلمته ....!!! أيش تتوقعوا من ثور معلوف في فندق هذا اللي يقدر عليه.. معكم خراج بصوت ابوحيدر 😂
أنت الشجاعة والشرف والشهم والشعب الوحيد الـلـي لــطـم بــيـده نـتـنـياهو وحــطـم صــابـره ملـكت فــي بـنك الـكرامة والـجهاد اكـبر رصـيد واصـبحت هشتاق الـشعوب الـمسلمة والـكافرة وانت الـوحيد الـجيد وانـت الحر لا يوم الوعيد هــــذا لـ ان الله ســخــر لــــك قــيــادة نــــادرة . #أمين_الجوفي
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AminAljofe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,058 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة الشاعر أمين الجوفي الرسمية” (@AminAljofe), 34,395 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AminAljofe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.