جنة الجواسيس تستيقظ! كيف تخطط طوكيو لبناء "CIA ياباني" لمواجهة الصين وكوريا الشمالية؟ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhH5KkjncBk
💩2

Channel
@stepnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
74,193subscribers
-560 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001007074036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stepnews |
| Description | وكالة اخبارية تُعنى بالشأن العربي وقضايا الشعوب العربية بمختلف جوانبها وتسلط الضوء على التاريخ العربي القديم والمعاصر بعيداً عن أي ايديولوجيات سياسية أو عرقية أو دينية. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stepnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 74,193 | -53 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 74,246 | -103 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 74,349 | -80 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 74,429 | -70 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 74,499 | -87 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 74,586 | -93 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 74,679 | -74 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 74,753 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 74,753 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,341 |
| Reactions total | 171 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
140 reactions across 48 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 22.9% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 18.6% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 9.29% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 8.57% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.57% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جنة الجواسيس تستيقظ! كيف تخطط طوكيو لبناء "CIA ياباني" لمواجهة الصين وكوريا الشمالية؟ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhH5KkjncBk
💩2
إسرائيل لا تنسحب ولا تهدأ.. ما خطتها لغزة ولبنان وسوريا وإيران؟ https://stepagency-sy.net/short/post-GI5shd 4 جبهات تحت عين إسرائيل.. ما الخطة؟
🤮2❤1
خاص|| قاآني يدعو للتسوية والزيدي لحصر السلاح.. أي مسار تختار بغداد؟ https://stepagency-sy.net/short/post-KjLk9V من يملك القرار النهائي؟
👍1
خدعة الدرونز والمناورة: كيف أفرغت #إيران مخازن السلاح الأمريكي؟ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP0lroL4b0w
👍1
طائرة تجسس تكبر بالجو وتتنفس ولا تقع..أغرب سلاح جو بالتاريخ #أمريكا via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9AVZ-z9fTw
👍1
من قلب الصحراء الليبية في الجنوب..قواعد لعبة أثرى الأقاليم تتغير! via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ePgN9oSwA0
مصر.. قتلى وجرحى في حادث تصادم في الإسماعيلية https://stepagency-sy.net/short/inc-QCLsn4
😢3❤1
خاص|| مأزق كبير وضربة في العمق السعودي.. خبير يكشف رسالة الحوثي للرياض وماذا تغير في المعادلة https://stepagency-sy.net/short/post-8bGk68
🔥4
خاص|| من يحاول اغتيال ترامب.. ولماذا ملاعب الغولف تحديدا؟ https://stepagency-sy.net/short/post-7OjU0d
🔥3
إعد*ام #بشار_الأسد..قصة لا تصدق للقاضي الذي حكمه! via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb7OrMBXb9Y
👏2
كيف ستتحرك جيوش تركيا وباكستان للدفاع عن السعودية؟ ومتى مصر؟ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAics8W2Nt4
❤4🤣2💩1🖕1
"باتريوت" أفضل وأرخص؟.. لماذا تخشى شركات أميركية منح أوكرانيا ترخيص إنتاجه؟ https://stepagency-sy.net/short/post-oU8qYN
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @stepnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@stepnews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وكالة ستيب الإخبارية - Step News Agency” (@stepnews), 74,193 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stepnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.