#عاجل | توغل عدد من الدبابات الإسرائيلية رفقة جرافات على تلة الريس قرب صلاح الدين شمال وادي غزة وتشرع بعمليات تجريف.

Channel
🎙 رصد الميدان 🎙
@RasadAlmedan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,709subscribers
-3,525 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001265515425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RasadAlmedan |
| Description | قناة رصد الميدان ، الواقع كما هو ... للتواصل @Rasad90 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RasadAlmedan |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 79,709 | -636 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 80,345 | -99 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 80,444 | -114 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 80,558 | -103 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 80,661 | -106 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 80,767 | -210 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 80,977 | -213 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 81,190 | -82 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 81,272 | -81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:05 | 81,353 | -62 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 81,415 | -93 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 81,508 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 81,549 | -63 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 81,612 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 81,672 | -54 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 81,726 | -67 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 81,793 | -91 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 81,884 | -113 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 81,997 | -107 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 82,104 | first reading |
Engagement
1,678 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.47%
- avg views ÷ 79,709 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,170
- 904 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.135%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 905
- of 1,678 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 611 of 904 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,678 (6 August 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,057,608 |
| Reactions total | 1,082 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈59,800
- Videos
- ≈31,100
- Links
- ≈2,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 31m 57s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,265 reactions across 670 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,092 | 86.3% | |
| 💔 | 56 | 4.43% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 2.06% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 1.19% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 1.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 0.949% | |
| 😡 | 12 | 0.949% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 0.87% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 0.87% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.316% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.237% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.237% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.237% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.079% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.079% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.079% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 690 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RasadAlmedan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
#عاجل | إطلاق نار مكثف من زوارق حربية إسرائيلية مدينة رفح.
#عاجل | مسؤول أمريكي للجزيرة: - حاملة الطائرات روزفلت غادرت مع مجموعتها الضاربة قاعدة سان دييغو متجهة إلى الشرق الأوسط. - أكثر من 2000 جندي من وحدة المارينز يتوجهون للشرق الأوسط على متن مجموعة الإنزال. - بحلول نهاية نوفمبر المقبل ستنتشر في محيط إيران 3 حاملات طائرات ومجموعتي إنزال.
#تنويه | هيئة البترول بغزة: دخول 5 شاحنات غاز طهي من اصل 6 شاحنات توجهت للمعبر صباحاً ، وسيتم توزيعها على المواطنين من كشف 28/09 الموحد لجميع محافظات القطاع . وذلك لقرابة 11324 مستفيد .
حائط البراق قبل قليل... حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل
❤🔥1
محدث لما يصلنا من مساهمات لسقيا ماء لأهلنا في شمال قطاع غزة .. كل ما وصلـ من أهل الخير 260 ـشيكل 5 شيكل 2 شيكل محفظة بال باي: 0595478842 جوال بي: 0595478842 للمساهمة من خارج فلسطين أو لمزيد من التفاصيل تلجرام @Rasad90 جزاكم الله خيرًا، وبارك في أموالكم وأعمالكم، وجعل عطاءكم في ميزان حسناتكم.
موقع الأخبار العاجلة العبري: المتحدث باسم الجيش الإسرائيلي: إغتال الجيش الإسرائيلي في وقت سابق من هذا الأسبوع (الثلاثاء) في منطقة مدينة غزة، وقتل محمد جمال محمود أبو شعر ، قائد مجموعة في الجناح العسكري لحركة حماس.كان أبو شعر قد داهم كيبوتس بئيري في هجوم 7 أكتوبر، وشارك في اختطاف شارون هرزمان أفيغدوري، ونوعام أفيغدوري، وعيدي شوهام، ونيف شوهام، وياهيل شوهام، وشوشان حاران، ونقلهم إلى قطاع غزة . في إغتيال آخر هذا الأس…
❤1
#عاجل | استشهاد المواطن مصعب البلبيسي في قصف إسرائيلي سابق شمالي قطاع غزة.
#عاجل | قصف مدفعي إسرائيلي شرقي خانيونس جنوبي قطاع غزة.
#عاجل | الصحة: استشهاد المواطن مشهور شاهر محمد ياسين (51 عاماً) برصاص مستوطنين في بلدة ياسوف شرق سلفيت.
عاجل | رويترز عن مصادر: - مسؤولون من سوريا وحزب الله التقوا في تركيا الشهر الماضي في أول اجتماع بين الطرفين. - اجتماع مسؤولين من سوريا وحزب الله في تركيا تناول المخاوف الأمنية المتبادلة وشهد إحراز تقدم.
مكتب إعلام الأسرى: تدهور الأوضاع الصحية والإنسانية لأسرى غزة في سجن جانوت، في ظل إصابات جراء القمع، وانتشار مرض السكابيوس، ونقص الطعام ومستلزمات النظافة، وغياب العلاج
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,678 posts we hold for @RasadAlmedan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RasadAlmedan edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
يهمنا رئيكم .. برئيكم نستمر في حملة سقيا ماء لأهلنا في شمال قطاع غزة ..!
- لا ، وما السبب22%
- نعم ، وندعمكم82%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@OshaqALQassam · 22,6821 postمناقشة قناة عُشَّاقُ القَسّام 𓂆💚
@OshaqAlQassamChat · 2,0191 post﴿بُشْرَاكُمُ الْيَوْمَ﴾ الإحتياطية
@OshaqAlQassamQoran · 1201 postرادع 🛡️
@R1Gaza · 48,0931 postسرايا القدس الإعلام الحربي (الرسمية)
@sarayaps · 139,9701 postواصف جودة | صحفي
@wasefJooda · 2,5451 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hamza20300 · 757,127#1
@hpress · 531,101#2
@ajanews · 1,321,392#3
@mumenjmmeqdad · 263,629#4
@Gaza_media07 · 75,533#5
@EabriLive · 230,341#6
@mtqdmon · 578,166#7
@qudsn · 617,814#8
@tadwena123 · 73,296#9
@muthanapress84 · 262,083#10
@MilitaRy2021 · 40,305#11
@almayadeen · 476,264#12
@meshheek · 383,947#13
@yaseenpress2004 · 145,814#14
@saedalzaneen8 · 163,528#15
@Hadeel_eisaa · 141,746#16
@MAH103MMED · 81,884#17
@gazanewsnow2021 · 95,067#18
@Almustashaar · 831,870#19
@fatehpress · 106,009#20
@me7war313mokawama · 130,922#21
@mehwaralmokawma · 105,145#22
@asmailpress · 86,088#23
@maydan_news · 146,947#24
@AliSalemps · 83,089#25
@Nablusgheer · 385,960#26
@AlQastalps · 109,467#27
@alhodhud · 45,890#28
@NewsPs0 · 60,423#29
@saraya2jinin · 73,940#30
@youseffares19 · 64,676#31
@azzamaddas · 251,476#32
@pales_jerus · 158,187#33
@Aree3_jenin · 80,325#34
@rasedal3ado138e · 112,134#35
@Djgfhjh · 93,329#36
@httpsBbmFFFhNGNi · 105,332#37
@Hebrewtranslation · 116,683#38
@APrees · 131,759#39
@Hebrew2024media · 88,228#40
@Sohaibpress · 171,837#41
@qudsfeed · 40,099#42
@hanialshaer · 101,203#43
@Electrohizbullah · 177,693#44
@El_shareef_mahmoud · 47,590#45
@newpress1 · 22,664#46
@ajMubasher · 352,964#47
@httpshgfhskskdkd · 40,330#48
@omanapal · 55,920#49
@almuhallel1 · 299,698#50
@messa054 · 85,022#51
@hazempress · 63,574#52
@GazaNewsNow · 145,080#53
@Nuseirat1 · 250,861#54
@rueib_alkian · 119,757#55
@Gazaplatform · 58,462#56
@akhbar_alme7war · 112,358#57
@jeniincamp · 189,208#58
@safypress90 · 42,775#59
@mnart_hdaya · 169,839#60
@jeninnews1 · 231,246#61
@muhamadalsharif · 84,238#62
@jenencamb · 205,856#63
@Alomhoar · 252,804#64
@Compass_News33 · 92,170#65
@yasseraboamar · 15,314#66
@PalpostN · 60,027#67
@Balata12 · 141,064#68
@Qudsnews7 · 17,809#69
@pressm989 · 21,066#70
@AJPalestine · 265,217#71
@KN103 · 12,568#72
@AMJAD_SHU · 52,583#73
@AkkaNews48 · 28,157#74
@nabuls_news · 182,864#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@q100dd · 24,194
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
@Gaza_media07 · 75,533
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@Almidanalan · 19,482
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
@muhamadalsharif · 84,238
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@bisharalibrary · 131,770
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@MilitaRy2021 · 40,305
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
@El_shareef_mahmoud · 47,590
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@Pufgyf200 · 49,501
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@hazempress · 63,574
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@messa054 · 85,022
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
@alharisnet · 32,273
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
@jobspals2 · 45,812
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@alagsa3agel · 44,227
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@Hebrewtranslation · 116,683
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@Almustashaar2 · 146,054
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@musaeadatgaza · 37,121
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
@NewsPs0 · 60,423
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@fatehpress · 106,009
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
@N_FFG · 115,102
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@alkhamisapal · 19,789
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
@AliSalemps · 83,089
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@Hebrew2024media · 88,228
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@APrees · 131,759
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
@Googlalsker1 · 97,458
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 136 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎙 رصد الميدان 🎙” (@RasadAlmedan), 79,709 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RasadAlmedan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.