Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -8,096. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263,049–273,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:38
264,263
-361
15 Sept 2026, 15:39
264,624
-292
13 Sept 2026, 20:17
264,916
-315
12 Sept 2026, 00:36
265,231
-313
9 Sept 2026, 19:01
265,544
-640
6 Sept 2026, 09:21
266,184
-425
3 Sept 2026, 23:38
266,609
-263
2 Sept 2026, 17:26
266,872
-232
1 Sept 2026, 13:59
267,104
-198
31 Aug 2026, 17:17
267,302
-193
30 Aug 2026, 19:05
267,495
-220
29 Aug 2026, 18:44
267,715
-161
28 Aug 2026, 19:47
267,876
-197
27 Aug 2026, 19:26
268,073
-122
26 Aug 2026, 20:55
268,195
-205
25 Aug 2026, 21:25
268,400
-185
24 Aug 2026, 20:14
268,585
-346
23 Aug 2026, 02:53
268,931
-371
21 Aug 2026, 15:47
269,302
-236
20 Aug 2026, 15:02
269,538
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.72%
avg views ÷ 264,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,100
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
47 (12 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
226,800
Reactions total
6,265
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,380
Videos
≈841
Links
≈462
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13m 05s
Average length
2m 11s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,618 reactions across 46 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,165
72.0%
💔
2,588
9.72%
😢
1,569
5.89%
😭
1,539
5.78%
👍
1,225
4.60%
😡
226
0.849%
🔥
165
0.62%
🤔
57
0.214%
🙏
56
0.21%
😱
18
0.068%
😨
10
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,093 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
746
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 47 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
251
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @abohamzahasanat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
في هذا اليوم، إخوانك الجوعى والأيتام الصغار بحاجة إلى دولارٍ واحدٍ منك!
تخيّل… دولارٌ واحدٌ فقط قد يكون عذرًا لك أمام الله من ذنب خذلانهم.
ساهم في يوم الجمعة، يوم الأجر، بما تملك، ولا تمرّ على هذه الكلمات مرور الكرام؛ فإن وصولها إليك حُجّةٌ لك أو عليك أمام الله، لأنها قد وصلتك!
للمساهمة /
https://ensany.com/campaign/8585
في هذه الليلة، إخوانك الجوعى والأيتام الصغار بحاجة إلى دولارٍ واحدٍ منك!
تخيّل… دولارٌ واحدٌ فقط قد يكون عذرًا لك أمام الله من ذنب خذلانهم.
ساهم في ليلة الجمعة، ليلة الأجر، بما تملك، ولا تمرّ على هذه الكلمات مرور الكرام؛ فإن وصولها إليك حُجّةٌ لك أو عليك أمام الله، لأنها قد وصلتك!
للمساهمة /
https://ensany.com/campaign/8585
قبل غروب شمس يوم الجمعة ولعلها الجمعة الأخيرة في حياتنا: لا تجعل الأيتام يشتكون تقصيرنا إلى الله.
قد لا تستطيع كفالة يتيم كاملًا، لكنك تستطيع أن تكون سببًا في إسعاد قلبه ولو بالقليل.
فبادر بما تستطيع، فلعل صدقةً في هذه الساعة تكون سببًا لرحمةٍ تنزل عليك في الدنيا، ونجاةٍ لك يوم تلقى الله.
https://ensany.com/campaign/8585
«إذا قلَّ ماءُ الوجهِ قلَّ حياؤه، وإذا قلَّ حياؤه قلَّ ورعُه، وإذا قلَّ ورعُه مات قلبُه.»
ولأن المروءة هي جميع مكارم الأخلاق، وفقدانها يعني ضياع القيم العليا للإنسان .
قبل غروب شمس يوم الجمعة: لا تجعل الأيتام يشتكون تقصيرنا إلى الله.
قد لا تستطيع كفالة يتيم كاملًا، لكنك تستطيع أن تكون سببًا في إسعاد قلبه ولو بالقليل.
فبادر بما تستطيع، فلعل صدقةً في هذه الساعة تكون سببًا لرحمةٍ تنزل عليك في الدنيا، ونجاةٍ لك يوم تلقى الله.
https://ensany.com/campaign/8585
قبل غروب شمس يوم الجمعة: لا تجعل الأيتام يشتكون تقصيرنا إلى الله.
قد لا تستطيع كفالة يتيم كاملًا، لكنك تستطيع أن تكون سببًا في إسعاد قلبه ولو بالقليل.
فبادر بما تستطيع، فلعل صدقةً في هذه الساعة تكون سببًا لرحمةٍ تنزل عليك في الدنيا، ونجاةٍ لك يوم تلقى الله.
https://ensany.com/campaign/8585
تقوم هذه الصفحة منذ فترة بالإساءة إلى الداعية محمود الحسنات، ونشر الأكاذيب والمقاطع المفبركة باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي، وكان آخر ما نشرته ادعاءً كاذبًا وافتراءً بأن الشيخ تزوّج من إحدى الفنانات.
لذلك نرجو من كل محبٍّ للحق، وكل من يرفض الكذب والتشهير بأعراض الناس، الدخول إلى الحساب والإبلاغ عن آخر مقطعين منشورين بسبب ما يتضمنانه من افتراء وتضليل وتشويه متعمّد.
قال تعالى:
﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُحِبُّونَ أَن تَشِيعَ الْفَ…
اليوم تشتاق إلى نفسك قبل عشرين عامًا،
إلى وجهك القديم وصحتك وأيامك التي لم تعرف قيمتها.
وبعد عشرين عامًا ستشتاق إلى نفسك التي أنت عليها الآن، وستتمنى لو تعود إلى هذا اليوم بكل ما تشتكي منه.
فلا تقضي عمرك تتحسر على أمس، ثم يأتي الغد فتتحسر على اليوم.
احتضن عمرك الآن،
قبل أن يأخذه الزمن،
وتكتشف أن أجمل أيام حياتك
كانت تلك التي مررت بها دون أن تعيشها.
❤360💔49👍25
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @abohamzahasanat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قدس برس / عاجل @qudspressbreaking · 110,272 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
مُدونتي - مخيمر @Mudawanti · 38,468 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
عبدالله العطار | صحفي @abdallah_alattar1999 · 126,517 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
Fayez Al-Dwairi I اللواء فايز الدويري @fayezaldwairi52 · 22,194 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
كتائب القسام - الإعلام العسكري @alqessam1 · 38,888 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
Mahmoud Abbas @MahmodAbbas · 21,327 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
إسماعيل الغول - Ismail Alghoul @ismail_gh2 · 28,203 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
مؤسَّسة قُربات الإنسانية. @qhfgaza · 44,365 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
د/ حازم شومان "قناة رسمية" @drhazemshouman · 262,530 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
قناة حسن الحسيني @husaini76 · 95,866 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
غزة الآن Gaza now @gazaalanar · 139,661 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
ISNAD - Palestine Movement @IsnadPalestin · 47,854 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
قناة الشيخ د. عثمان الخميس ـ الرسمية @othmanalkamees · 81,588 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الداعية محمود الحسنات” (@abohamzahasanat), 264,263 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abohamzahasanat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.