Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سَطر عِراقي

Channel

سَطر عِراقي

@aassx22

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

93,311subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001750415819
TypeChannel
Username@aassx22
Descriptionأنهَ وكَلبي ، مَحد مَستعز بينه . بوت سايتh @aaaii9bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aassx22

Growth

92,82393,42693,124.59 August 2026 — 93,186 subscribers9 August 2026 — 93,143 subscribers10 August 2026 — 93,066 subscribers11 August 2026 — 93,001 subscribers12 August 2026 — 92,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 92,823 subscribers14 August 2026 — 93,426 subscribers16 August 2026 — 93,311 subscribers93,3119 August 202616 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,733–93,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:5793,311-115
14 Aug 2026, 22:2693,426+603
13 Aug 2026, 15:3692,823-85
12 Aug 2026, 17:0492,908-93
11 Aug 2026, 16:4293,001-65
10 Aug 2026, 16:5593,066-77
9 Aug 2026, 17:2293,143-43
9 Aug 2026, 03:3193,186first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 93,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,000
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held30 (1 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total420,713
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
577
Videos
29
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aassx22. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈9,760 viewsread 16 August 2026

ما تنكر فضل وما ننسى خذلان وشم ب كلوبنه تبقى المواقف؟

11 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈9,740 viewsread 16 August 2026

ما نغلط بعد ونصير مثل الخيط تحطنه على الجرح وتعوفنة الابره

11 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈9,690 viewsread 16 August 2026

ياريت الناس كُلها تروح مِن بالي وبسّ أنتَ وحلاتك تكَعد كبالي

11 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈9,620 viewsread 16 August 2026

بطرانه الشمس تجويني كُل يوّم وَ أنا جرورتي تجوّي التنانير .

11 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈9,700 viewsread 16 August 2026

هذا اخر لقاء وياج راح يصير کلمن بينه خل يسولف العنده والباب الفتحنا بالضحك يا حيف بدموع الفراك ثنينه نسده من كتيلي احبك ورده كتلج هاچ طلع مو حب صدگ رجعيها للورده اني بكد الترافه و انت كد الشوك كلمن بينا خلي يحب واحد بكده

11 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈8,710 viewsread 16 August 2026

مثل الجكاره بكل وكت تنراد نعرف مضرتك ونحبك اعناد .

7 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC≈15,400 viewsread 16 August 2026

أدري تلگالك حَبيب وتنسَى ودي وأدري تچويني اليَالي وأضل وحدِي

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @aassx22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 592,459 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

- مَـڪاتيِب.
@MAKATIB1 · 36,032
#1
-حَچي هَلي.
@ERT8l · 130,224
#2
مُـبعثَر
@Kd_kla1 · 40,147
#3
- ꪔᥙ᥉ᥣᥴ .
@iii6b · 52,688
#4
حجي عراقي
@Slll3 · 7,374
#5
حُب
@T_16_7 · 50,960
#6
عُ
@OAFL2 · 6,116
#7
رامـــي ؟♡
@w9hs5 · 3,748
#8
- سِحرُ العُيُونِ
@sxserc · 28,036
#9
- زَهراء محَمد .
@zhraamohammed21 · 1,578
#10
تعَىٰ نشرب سِيجاره
@szovl · 12,200 (as read 16 August 2026)
#11
𝗺𝗿. d8r
@UTITV · 4,890 (as read 16 August 2026)
#12
مُحَـطَم.
@cckkxs · 14,361
#13
لـ 8.27
@alhaam55 · 1,703
#14
مَشاعر .
@ff2tm · 48,461
#15
مشاعر .
@K27R99 · 31,543
#16
مَ
@mr4em · 228
#17
-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 70,796
#18
🦢
@swangirl6 · 9,651
#19
رُبما نَلتقي.
@MUTEVM · 6,142
#20
H .
@zzczz10 · 6,461
#21
نيـرَان.
@i_1ei · 1,434
#22
مَهْزِيَارَة
@at0iw · 4,781 (as read 16 August 2026)
#23
دِجـله و فُـرات .
@Firat25 · 12,987
#24
عُمر عبدألسّلام
@deved_iraq · 122,635
#25
ضَمٌائر .
@Al_Re313 · 1,535
#26
حــُـر
@x0rbq · 276 (as read 16 August 2026)
#27
شـعر
@axclw · 12,432
#28
مَشاعر
@Mius_10 · 422
#29
فࢪصتناا٭
@sisbsys · 277
#30
جَبار رشِيد .
@m1r1m3 · 1,615
#31
𝗦ᰰ֩ 🪾
@rfriir · 975 (as read 16 August 2026)
#32
_
@fccpii · 201
#33
كن مطمئناً
@s1dds · 2,172 (as read 16 August 2026)
#34
with you
@xillrv · 93
#35
حُب وَ حَربْ
@sabiahkgc · 1,332
#36
بّـــــــغـــــــدآد🧶🎃
@ry849 · 211
#37
مِـش هَـتعدي .
@Yllh7 · 17,229
#38
آريّـس .
@ys_er35 · 53 (as read 16 August 2026)
#39
شُعُورِ.
@smsmi · 286
#40
- رغَبَة .
@rrqeaa · 14,775
#41
شَ
@shlir8 · 137 (as read 16 August 2026)
#42
. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI · 75,330
#43
الْجَـوَى •
@muslim_n9 · 345
#44
المَريـم ♡
@mmimm25 · 31 (as read 16 August 2026)
#45
جـيمٌٰ
@vnf444 · 406
#46
شمسِين .
@vc6Il · 132,475
#47
توصيات
@O_2k94 · 1,125
#48
شَذَرْ .
@at0iv · 2,189
#49
🫦•.𝗛 ⧣
@kkkimu · 683 (as read 16 August 2026)
#50
ملاذي الحُسين
@BGT_L · 3,245
#51
رَحيِم
@ilrahim · 8,069
#52
- زَهّرة
@IUI5eI · 5,544
#53
.
@gngna1 · 3,886
#54
ثروناو :
@cf67c · 44,174
#55
SHADOW
@SHADOWW30 · 1,863
#56
فلر بصراوي-memes
@vewsr · 3,413
#57
Memes ميمز دمعة جلب
@iiPiii · 53,332
#58
lsHadow
@Hadowsh · 3,255
#59
🩷
@foxiediary · 3,358
#60
- DisSticKers
@DZzD5 · 14,834
#61
ميمز الواعين
@Kd_kla4 · 228
#62

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

< L A R F E N - لارفين ®
@cccpck · 106,846
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سَطر عِراقي” (@aassx22), 93,311 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aassx22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.