Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 第?国际

Channel

第?国际

@TheQth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003561340017
TypeChannel
Username@TheQth
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheQth

Growth

7882809 August 2026 — 78 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78 subscribers9 August 2026 — 79 subscribers17 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:2482+3
9 Aug 2026, 22:2179+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:1578no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:4878first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total647
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎433.3%
👍216.7%
18.33%
🌭18.33%
👻18.33%
💩18.33%
🥰18.33%
🫡18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Hitler was a left-wing socialist ▎Source

👎1

6 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

我们强烈不建议在毛忌日或诞日前往韶山等相关纪念点,不要给自己带来不必要的风险

5 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

对于这篇文章需要在 那么,我们对中国革命性质的判断是什么?我们认为,未来的中国革命首先是无产阶级的,产生于垄断资本主义时代积累且不断激化的阶级矛盾,无产阶级会成为反对专制政权和资本主义的革命当中最为激进的组织力量。 的判断基础上进一步指出的是 超过民主主义范围,就谈不到无产阶级和农民资产阶级之间的意志的统一。 ——列宁《社会民主党在民主革命中的两种策略》10.“革命公社”与无产阶级和农民的革命民主专政 这也就是说:当下直接进行社会主义革命的主力只有无产阶级。无产阶级其中的主力又是产业工人。

1

5 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @novemberreviewcommunist

https://telegra.ph/on-revolution-praxis-02-11

4 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @eventstracingPhoto

标题:千钧棒——紧追穷寇——批判托派黑文:政治寄生虫、速胜投机客、革命过家家——机会主义者从不在物质上思考中国革命 到底谁是吸血群众的精英主义呢?是这些懒得连组织都不建设,拿着能被警察盘问、谈恋爱打垮的融工队伍,去蹭群众自发斗争热闹的流量,受速胜投机狗急跳墙而鼓动没有组织力量(因为机会主义者没法组织群众)的群众去公开“起义”送死的托派先生呢?还是从一开始就严肃对待革命问题,几十年如一日的建设革命家组织,身先士卒的承担地下暴力任务,为地上组织扫清障碍、在地上组织建设中与群众一起劳动且冲锋在前,处决压迫群众首恶的马列毛主义者呢? 当机会主义者还沉浸在闹事队伍变红军的过家家时,革命的解放道路已经明朗,我们无产阶级应该走上这条大路,让机会主义者在泥潭里获得妄想吧,而我们将得到一个新的共产党、新的红军,一个新中国! 👉 点击查看原文

3 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gong_ge_newsPhoto

今天,我们怀着沉痛与敬意,纪念王洪文同志逝世三十四周年。 王洪文同志出身工人,在无产阶级文化大革命中挺身而出,投身上海一月风暴,与革命群众一起冲破旧秩序,夺取地方权力,为建立无产阶级专政的新型政权作出了重要贡献。他在这场伟大斗争中坚定站在毛主席革命路线一边,积极参与并推动无产阶级专政下的继续革命,致力于清除党内走资本主义道路的当权派,捍卫社会主义道路。 他的一生,是工人阶级在文化大革命中迅速成长、投身继续革命的缩影。尽管历史曲折,他为无产阶级专政和继续革命所做的努力,仍值得我们铭记与思考。 王洪文同志永垂不朽! 王洪文同志是无产阶级文化大革命中涌现出的工人领袖。1967年上海一月风暴期间,他以纺织工人身份投身夺权斗争,与革命群众一道打碎旧市委,建立上海人民公社(后改为革命委员会),极大地推动了全国范围的夺权浪潮,为巩固无产阶级专政的实践打了样。 一月风暴是无产阶级在上层建筑领域向资产阶级司令部发起的猛烈进攻。王洪文同志

👻1🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 04:11 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

从 300 人增长到 30,000 人(净增加 29,700 人),按照每月增加 10 个人的固定速度计算(不考虑死亡率): * 需要的时间:2,970 个月 * 折合年份:247 年 6 个月 如果从 2026 年 7 月开始算,达到 30,000 人大约需要等到 2274 年 1 月。

💩1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 04:10 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026

地下革命家组织发展到能够往全国各省市区派出足够数量的代办员以建立地上群众互助组织的时候,便到了战略防御的第二阶段。 中国大陆有2847个县级行政区。每县按需10个人算3万人:如果想在一代人(比如 20 年)的时间里从 300 人增长到 3 万人,每月需要稳定增加 130~140 人左右。此时大群进入工业化融工阶段

29 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @eventstracingPhoto

从中日矛盾看帝国主义之间的狗咬狗 哪里会有不吃人的资本家,无论是中修人民企业家,还是欧美资本家,都是一丘之貉! 👉 点击查看原文

28 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026

有事还可以交给学徒,算是可以混一混的,出现事故也不用担责,顶多被开除 看到一位老师傅要把活交由不熟练的学徒工,无法让老师傅在生产剩余价值的过程中被累死、被消耗革命时间 原来大群的“活”指出的事故

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheQth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“第?国际” (@TheQth), 82 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheQth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.