接到一份投稿,这来自于一个湖南小组批判另外一个核心位于湖南长沙湘潭地区,成员在全国有所分布的机会主义组织,文中的橘系指的就是该组织。我们认为这里面提到的经验教训对我们有所有益,所以分享在这里。
🌚2

Channel
@maoistroad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004480265013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maoistroad |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 27 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maoistroad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 98 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 91 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 86 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 81 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 81 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 82 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (27 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
30 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 6 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
接到一份投稿,这来自于一个湖南小组批判另外一个核心位于湖南长沙湘潭地区,成员在全国有所分布的机会主义组织,文中的橘系指的就是该组织。我们认为这里面提到的经验教训对我们有所有益,所以分享在这里。
🌚2
https://telegra.ph/ROC%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%8E%B0%E5%9C%A8%E6%98%AF%E5%90%A6%E5%BA%94%E8%AF%A5%E8%BF%9B%E8%A1%8C%E7%BA%BF%E4%B8%8A%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C-07-31
🗿2👍1
https://telegra.ph/ROC%E4%BB%8E%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%A7%92%E5%BA%A6%E8%B0%88%E5%B7%A6%E6%B4%BE%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E6%BB%A5%E7%94%A8%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%9E%E8%B4%A8-07-31
🔥1🥱1
https://telegra.ph/ROC%E5%AF%B9%E9%98%B3%E5%92%8C%E5%B9%B3%E8%A8%80%E8%AE%BA%E7%9A%84%E6%80%A7%E8%B4%A8%E8%BF%9B%E8%A1%8C%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E5%92%8C%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4-07-31
👍2👎1
https://telegra.ph/ROC%E5%AF%B9%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E8%BF%90%E5%8A%A8%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A-07-31
👎2👍1
为方便转发我们将把之前的文章都换成网页形式
关于新青年(赤旗)争斗事件的全过程梳理和分析.pdf
💩2🤬1
【投稿】 有人分享了著名媒体“路灯与断头台”的后台赤旗(新青年)的过往“作战记录”。仅供参考研究。 从这里我们可以得到关于中国机会主义者的信息。何为机会主义者?在这里,机会主义者是不按照革命路线严谨推进而是抓住各种次要矛盾把自己推到风口浪尖的这样一群披着意识形态外衣的,自觉或不自觉的投机者所为。 我们呼吁:不要参与赤旗的网络斗争,不要在他们的视频下评论其意识形态,不要添加他们的群聊,不要接触他们的成员。一定要保证自己身为左派的独立与安全,把精力投入到对左派理论斗争和组织化的促进上去,要毫不动摇地拒绝(不是直接斗争,是拒绝。斗争本质上是要依靠组织化将左派的游民习气排除)合法马克思主义和借用了现代各类形式的投机主义。
🥱1
结束了这篇文章,让我们引用一段话来总结当前意识形态工作的任务: “如果说,学习共产主义只限于领会共产主义著作、书本和小册子里的东西,那我们就很容易造就出一些共产主义的书呆子或吹牛家,而这往往会使我们受到损害,因为这种人虽然把共产主义书本和小册子上的东西读得烂熟,却不善于把所有这些知识融会贯通,也不会按共产主义的真正要求去行动。 对理论的误判实际上也会导致组织建设的误判,譬如燎原将出水文当成了“义务劳动”。而真正想搞理论的组织,意识到了理论系统化的难处,也意识到现在自己暂时无法操作这些东西,就会优先进行组织建设。不对空洞的对外公开宣传(如视频等)抱有幻想。 革命与组织协调(ROC)
【革命与组织协调:从哲学角度谈左派理论滥用的实质】 燎原是典型的理论滥用组织。虚空索敌、堆砌简单术语、强行附会也是屡见不鲜。关于为什么会有理论的滥用,这是左派自己分散状况所致。但我们今天从哲学角度来谈谈这个问题,顺带再附上一篇燎原的文章。 马克思主义哲学在马克思和列宁时期有明确的任务,就是从纷繁复杂的资产阶级哲学中“蒸馏”掉各种杂质,提取出精准的术语。马克思主义哲学中存在着当时成熟的科学、以及完善的黑格尔体系的术语借用。在当时,马克思主义哲学和他们的研究者们获得了明确清晰的含义和对人类认识史的相对准确的概括。后面,苏联的研究者们也继承了这一点。(苏联在辩证唯物主义的系统化中的作用当之无愧,例如辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义二分就是他们的功劳)但在当时,他们的任务是驳斥论敌、阐述基本观点,甚至是硬核的观点。然而,马克思主义哲学的术语更多来源于对过去哲学传统的借用。比起严密的政治经济学体系,马克思主义哲学是没有那么严密的…
🗿1
【阳和平:抗战纪念日谈伊朗、乌克兰政权的两面性-哔哩哔哩】 直达:BV1L3Me6GEse 对阳和平言论的性质进行分析 阳和平说伊朗是“世界反帝的前线”,说乌克兰和伊朗进行的是正义的战争。 仅仅是因为他们是防御战吗? 阳和平丢出了社会分析,说他们类似“国民党政府”。可是,阳和平到底有没有对乌克兰与伊朗的经济与阶级斗争状况进行分析呢?没有。仅仅从现象上的历史来看,乌克兰带有某种被殖民的性质,但乌克兰不带有半封建的性质。伊朗的伊斯兰革命的情况也要特殊很多,是不同阶级力量复杂作用的结果。 首先,他是没有分析的。 其次,伊朗和乌克兰能否类比民国政府呢?不能。其所以不能,是因为其在阶级力量上不存在一个共产党和共产党领导的统一战线。毛说过,这个统一战线绝不能是一切都经过国民党同意才能办(见《毛泽东选集》中《论统一战线的独立自主问题》)毛又说:“对于抗日任务,民主也是新阶段中最本质的东西,为民主即是…
❤2👎1
【投稿】 一篇对左派文章的逻辑分析 (选自《燎原月刊》(第六十五期))(“[]”是作者加的) “卷首语 如何使党员与群众正确理解和贯彻党的路线和策略? 印共毛的同志们是这么回答这个问题的:“由于整个党的理论水平相对较低,由于没有足够的党委委员接受过彻底的思想和政治训练,由于我们的革命运动是在落后的农村地区进行的,在那里工作的党组织的文化水平很低,由于其他原因,在理解和贯彻党的路线和政策的过程中,更有可能发生更多的错误和出现错误倾向。” 党员来自于小资产阶级出身[印共毛并没有提到党员的小资产阶级出身]的居多,难道就会造成他们不遵守党所制定的革命路线了吗?恩格斯是资产阶级出身,毛主席是富农出身,难道他们的阶级出身导致了他们背叛革命吗?革命家组织中不应当搞阶级出身划分,而应当搞政治划分。(难道我们在文化大革命中,吃到的“唯出身论”的亏还少么?)[但是这不是在虚空索敌吗] 党员文化水平低、不懂革命理论,就会造成他们不理解革命路线,因…
🔥3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @maoistroad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 571,535 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“革命与组织协调” (@maoistroad), 98 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maoistroad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.