Photo, posted without a caption
👎2

Channel
@redleftwiki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004482996711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redleftwiki |
| Created | 23 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redleftwiki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 84 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 76 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,285 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
87 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 33 | 37.9% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 14.9% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 4.60% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👎2
维基是否应该尊重著作权?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👎2👍1
Signed Albert Julie JA
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Contents/zh 可参考这个帮助页面进行编辑
👎2👍1
Signed Albert Julie JA
一封欢迎信 同志们你好!这里是革命马列毛维基项目组,我们现在想要邀请每个人参加到这个人人可编辑的马列毛百科工程上面来。 如果同志们愿意加入到革命马列毛维基的,请注册账号即可。 维基的帮助页可供同志们探讨相关问题。 欢迎你们的加入 维基地址:https://wiki.gongge491001.org
👍7👎4🤡2❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki»
Channel name was changed to «革命马列毛维基 R-MLM Wiki»
公开信 同志们你好!这里是工革报,我们现在想要邀请你们参加【革命马列毛维基】项目组。 这是一个由【工革报】发起的项目。现在项目组的主要参加人员和各种事务暂时还由工革报进行。但是我们认为这不是工革报一个组织的事务,而应该由维基【社群】进行、各组织组成的【项目组】代表领导的项目。 我们希望在立场上和目前现有的资产阶级性质的百科和报刊有所不同,就像1953年之前的苏联大百科全书一样,苏联大百科全书是明确站在无产阶级立场的,以马列主义作为指导来编写的百科全书。 维基项目的【目的】是多面的,而这些目的主要集中在阅读维基所能带来的教育上的裨益,次要的是通过维基编写、以无产阶级的立场、革命的导向、马列毛主义的理论,对各个概念、理论进行阐述、澄清和驳斥,反映马克思列宁毛泽东主义的理论和实践。例如有: - 国史写作,并对自由派的攻击进行反驳 - 政治经济学概念阐述 - 左翼组织介绍 - 安全保卫工作 - 左翼思想动态集中点(如“政治报”和…
❤6👎3
革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki pinned Deleted message
Channel name was changed to «革命马列毛维基频道»
维基已经恢复,架构稳定,备份机制已完善
❤5👎2
我们会进行技术上规范的系统搭建框架调整和每日的云盘加密备份,以确保今后不会有删库丢失的数据问题发生
👍6🤡2👎1
Signed 革命左翼维基 燎原之火
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redleftwiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
维基是否应该尊重著作权?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
维基是否要绝对禁止ai使用?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 661,749 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki” (@redleftwiki), 84 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redleftwiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.