Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 马列毛主义与革命左翼 时事评论 🔑 入群审核 ⚠️ @maoistQAIIbot

Channel

马列毛主义与革命左翼 时事评论 🔑 入群审核 ⚠️ @maoistQAIIbot

@eventstracing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,554subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001770140333
TypeChannel
Username@eventstracing
Description马列毛,共产主义,马克思,列宁,毛泽东,斯大林,鲁迅,全集下载,切格瓦拉,左派,苏联,社会主义,无产阶级,马克思主义,印共毛,斯大林,恩格斯,毛主席,江青,星火燎原,燎原,燎原月刊, 🔑 入群审核 ⚠️ @maoistQAIIbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eventstracing

Growth

20,53720,59020,563.57 August 2026 — 20,590 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,590 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,589 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,566 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,557 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,546 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,537 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,550 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,563 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,553 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,542 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,541 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,550 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,554 subscribers20,5547 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,529–20,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 21:5620,554+4
20 Aug 2026, 14:4420,550+9
19 Aug 2026, 12:0220,541-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:0420,542-11
17 Aug 2026, 10:4720,553-10
15 Aug 2026, 19:4620,563+13
14 Aug 2026, 09:5820,550+13
13 Aug 2026, 05:1820,537-9
12 Aug 2026, 02:0520,546-11
11 Aug 2026, 01:0220,557-9
10 Aug 2026, 00:4120,566-7
9 Aug 2026, 03:5420,573-16
8 Aug 2026, 01:2420,589-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:4520,590no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3820,590first reading

Engagement

214 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.66%
avg views ÷ 20,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
340
212 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
214
of 214 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 197 of 212 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held214 (6 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total72,182
Reactions total1,211
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,800
Videos
18
Links
20,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,211 reactions across 196 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍89874.2%
13210.9%
❤‍🔥1189.74%
👏181.49%
🔥141.16%
😭90.743%
🤔50.413%
👎30.248%
💯30.248%
🤡30.248%
💩20.165%
😢20.165%
🤣20.165%
🤮20.165%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

电影《四渡》与《抓特务》是如何抹黑革命的 近期又是几部中修资产阶级的“传世之作”《四渡》以及《抓特务》的横空出世,这两部片子内容笔者就不细讲了,其本质上仍旧是用来维护资产阶级统治,抹黑革命的一部大毒草作品,只不过没有带来其想要的“维稳”效果,反而是适得其反,引起了网络上的骂战。 👉 点击查看原文

👍2

22 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

河北发生命案,群众自发反对中修保护杀人犯 中修对群众的反抗怕得要死恨得要命,不惜对自发反抗杀人的农民开展工业化的千警搜捕,这是他们极其自觉地维护反动统治的体现。而群众却始终是自发的,无论是农民自发反抗杀人,还是自发地帮助这位农民送水送食物,他们的反抗和互助精神应该高度肯定,但是却对推翻中修是无济于事的。组织是无产阶级的唯一武器,只有走上政治报路线,建设全国一盘棋的地下革命家组织,才能不断赤化出自觉的革命者,领导群众高度自觉、高度工业化地组织起来武装推翻中修,让人民在社会主义新中国中彻底免受压迫。 👉 点击查看原文

👍2

22 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC230 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

中修的反腐只是利益斗争而已 自从资产阶级复辟,重新建立起资产阶级专政以来,中修就一直在强调反腐的问题,可是过去了近五十年,不仅腐败的人数越来越多,金额也在不断增加。而随着中修反腐力度的提升,腐败问题并没有得到根治,而只是隐藏了起来。 👉 点击查看原文

👍1

21 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC424 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

千钧棒——紧追穷寇——曲径通幽与狗屁不通的艺术 野火机会主义团体为了贩卖他们的小组建党和宣传主义路线,已经疯狂到不惜编造,反逻辑的地步了,看我们怎么反击他们。 👉 点击查看原文

👍1

21 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC398 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

评河南西平案——本质是阶级压迫 依然是一起贫穷的无产阶级被剥削压迫,出们在外无亲无故没有任何人给他援助。但成鲜明对比的是,当资产阶级警察得知他杀人后,派出上千警力以及无人机等等去围剿。看来不是没有资源给与这位农民帮助,而恰恰是资产阶级将其完全垄断,只用于剥削压迫无产阶级。 👉 点击查看原文

👍61

21 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC434 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

谈谈中修文艺《四渡》与《抓特务》 近期,中修又推出了几部电影,以此来弘扬他们所谓的“革命精神”,由此蒙蔽无产阶级。其中以《四渡》与《抓特务》这两部电影最为显著,这两部电影的背景都是“历史题材”,那么到底宣扬了一种什么样的精神?下面笔者展开来说…… 👉 点击查看原文

👍1

21 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC447 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

千钧棒——紧追穷寇——针对野火暴露出来的宣传主义问题的批判 机会主义者们总是有些奇怪的小巧思的,不过向来如此嘛,就如同邓修一天一个新点子一样。这些换汤不换药的小巧思想达到的目的无他,就是想开历史的倒车罢了 👉 点击查看原文

👍1

21 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC481 views18 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

从重庆时代峰峻事件来看中修激男女对立来转移阶级矛盾 近些年来,网络上和现实中关于“男女对立”的吵闹声越来越大,各种离奇古怪的新闻层出不穷。很多人被裹挟其中,今天骂“极端女权”,明天喊“男权崛起”,互相对喷、打得不可开交。但这真的是普通的性别纠纷吗?绝不是! 作为马列毛主义者,我们必须穿透这些乱象,看清背后的本质:这是中修资产阶级为了掩盖日益尖锐的阶级矛盾,自觉利用和挑动无产阶级内部差异,搞“挑动群众斗群众”的反动戏码! 👉 点击查看原文

👍15🤡3

21 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC444 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

批判反动大毒草《四渡》及《无悔追踪》 《四渡》电影想必大家都不陌生,尽管近段时间以来,中修官方宣传其票房刷新长征题材影片历史记录,极尽夸赞,但由于其反动之深,哪怕是未曾了解过马列毛理论的众多人民群众都无法接受,笔者此次就不过多赘述其反动细节之处,主要批判其背后反映的立场问题。 👉 点击查看原文

👍42

21 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC443 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Mina究竟是被什么害死的? mina的死是资本主义社会的恶果,资产阶级用奶头乐麻痹无产阶级,赚取利益并通过标签分化群众,转移矛盾。只有发动无产阶级革命,彻底推翻资产阶级的统治,建立无产阶级专政才能避免mina的悲剧再次发生。 👉 点击查看原文

21 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC482 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

从7.30西平命案看群众自发斗争的无力 近期河南驻马店市西平县发生了一起群众自发斗争事件,夏付钢为了反抗恶霸欺压怒而杀人,最终被中修抓捕。夏付钢的自发杀人失败了,群众为他自发宣传也失败了,原因就在于路线错了,自发斗争走不通,只有自觉斗争才能胜利。无产阶级的敌人不是一两个资本家和恶霸,而是整个资产阶级,必须通过革命打倒中修资产阶级专政,否则阶级压迫就永远无法摆脱。要实现这个目标,无产阶级就必须团结起来,列宁告诉我们,要战胜资产阶级,就必须首先建立先锋队,才能领导无产阶级进行自觉斗争。 👉 点击查看原文

6👍1

20 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC543 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

从医疗体系看中修的腐败一革命是唯一的出路 随着生产力的发展,科学技术日新月异,中修天天宣传又突破了某某技术、又是遥遥领先;“提笔写尽天下事,却不俯首看苍生”,这是群众们嘲讽中修的黑话,事实的确如此,中修为什么天天鼓吹生产力呢?其目的就是掩盖人剥削人的生产关系,好继续奴役劳动人民!但马列毛主义告诉我们,生产关系与生产力是辩证发展的,当生产关系不与生产力相匹配,那么是会把生产力往后拉的,这也就是为啥目前中修科学技术没有实质性的发展(全世界资产阶级也一样)只有解放了雇佣劳动这个生产关系,取而代之社会主义的生产关系,才能解放生产力服务于群众! 点击查看原文👉

Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @eventstracing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@eventstracing edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 844,692 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“马列毛主义与革命左翼 时事评论 🔑 入群审核 ⚠️ @maoistQAIIbot” (@eventstracing), 20,554 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eventstracing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.