Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 工革报发布室

Channel

工革报发布室

@gong_ge_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19,197subscribers

+14,001 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116752063
TypeChannel
Username@gong_ge_news
Description这里是工革报发布室,是工革报编辑部在Telegram的唯一官方发布频道。 诸稿件发布 https://t.me/ggbgaojian 工革报交流群:https://t.me/gong_ge_talking matrix发布室: #gonggenews:matrix.org 备用群: @kmjbwsa 加入工革报:https://forms.gle/fjBWgw
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gong_ge_news

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,16720,20012,683.57 August 2026 — 5,196 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,193 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,167 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,183 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,171 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,152 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,133 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,125 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,105 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,086 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,075 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,056 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,035 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,026 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,010 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,999 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,993 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,955 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,915 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,829 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,740 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,703 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,683 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,667 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,651 subscribers26 September 2026 — 19,595 subscribers4 October 2026 — 19,527 subscribers9 October 2026 — 19,491 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,482 subscribers14 October 2026 — 19,474 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,466 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,462 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,451 subscribers18 October 2026 — 19,447 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,443 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,439 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,432 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,423 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,403 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,397 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,388 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,379 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,371 subscribers28 October 2026 — 19,355 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,344 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,333 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,320 subscribers1 November 2026 — 19,311 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,310 subscribers3 November 2026 — 19,288 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,273 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,262 subscribers6 November 2026 — 19,254 subscribers7 November 2026 — 19,240 subscribers8 November 2026 — 19,219 subscribers10 November 2026 — 19,197 subscribers19,1977 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 95 days, net +14,001. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,912–22,455 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:3919,197-22
8 Nov 2026, 17:3919,219-21
7 Nov 2026, 11:5719,240-14
6 Nov 2026, 12:5919,254-8
5 Nov 2026, 11:4019,262-11
4 Nov 2026, 13:1019,273-15
3 Nov 2026, 10:5719,288-22
2 Nov 2026, 09:1919,310-1
1 Nov 2026, 10:5519,311-9
31 Oct 2026, 14:1719,320-13
30 Oct 2026, 15:4619,333-11
29 Oct 2026, 19:0119,344-11
28 Oct 2026, 21:0019,355-16
27 Oct 2026, 18:2019,371-8
26 Oct 2026, 19:0019,379-9
25 Oct 2026, 22:1519,388-9
24 Oct 2026, 18:5919,397-6
23 Oct 2026, 20:4619,403-20
22 Oct 2026, 17:3719,423-9
21 Oct 2026, 09:5919,432first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.21%
avg views ÷ 19,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
425
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held62 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total1,698
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
308
Videos
33
Links
277

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,518 reactions across 57 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡63341.7%
👍19412.8%
👎19412.8%
❤1459.55%
👏775.07%
🫡503.29%
🤣442.90%
💩362.37%
🤮352.31%
😁211.38%
🌭201.32%
😨150.988%
🤔110.725%
🖕90.593%
😭70.461%
🔥50.329%
😱40.264%
🕊30.198%
😢30.198%
🥰30.198%
9 further kinds90.593%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 62 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gong_ge_news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC321 views17 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

最近我们注意到,有一篇研究“中国后疫情时期毛派政治”的论文在Z-library和中国互联网左圈当中广为流传。文中讨论了相当多“地下”左翼政治的源流和发展,总结了“融工派”和“政治报派”的辩论,以及点名了工农解放社、列宁道路、东风、前进报等组织,将其论述与观点加以总结演绎,并试图论证“融工派”和“政治报派”的派别矛盾和政治论战对于中国左翼的意义。我们认为,这样一篇文章的存在和传播是危险的。我们谴责这种从互联网获取政治材料,在不经任何组织或个人的同意下,总结演绎其政治材料并将其作为个人学术资本、服务于个人在资产阶级学术建制当中事业的行为。我们认为,对于中国左翼来说,来自台湾的总结和声音固然是受欢迎的,但绝不应该以任何形式勾连学术建制,为个人利益服务。 其次,文中关于许多派别的观点和其活动的论述是完全失实的,文章将工农解放社与工人革命报的路线斗争总结为简单的组织分裂,而不介绍这两者之间根本的观点分歧,更是对“政治报派”的最新理论建设…

🤡7👍5🤔4💩1

13 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC687 views21 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @jiuzhouxuemengpindao

起来,不愿做苦役的同学们——评五原一中学生的集体抗争 内蒙古五原一中,一群高二学生在国庆前夕做了件事:他们不再各自忍受,而是把名字签在同一张纸上,向违规补课的校方说"不"。几十个签名,让个人的"厌学情绪"变成了无法歪曲的集体诉求。 但联名之后呢?代表怎么选?家长和老师站哪边?举报到教育局就能解决吗?——如何防止秋后算账,如何把一次性的愤怒变成持久的团结,本文来探讨这些问题。 欢迎关注我们的频道:https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengpindao 欢迎加入我们的群组:https://t.me/jiuzhouxuemengtaolunqun 欢迎为我们投稿,投稿邮箱为: [email protected]

💩12👍7❤1🤡1

10 Oct 2026, 06:37 UTC≈1,040 views26 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

全法国学生团结起来,打倒反动资产阶级政府及其镇压机器 目前,在全世界范围内出现反对老牌资本主义国家财政规划的高潮。自冷战以来,苏联解体以后。西方大多数所谓的“民主国家”都在不断地利用紧缩财政,一方面压榨本国无产阶级,另一方面又继续向第三世界国家扩张,压迫他国的无产阶级。新的牢笼格局依然在不断地跟进,各国的无产阶级都应当有所准备去破除资产阶级的障眼法,继续斗争。但是,当前世界的主要倾向是革命。 法国当局在国内财政状况严重不乐观的情况下,非但不反思自身在财政上的各种错误决策,反而在面对学生和群众抗议的声音中毅然对一线斗争的学生们进行了镇压,激起了全法国学生的愤怒反抗。工革报热烈支持全法国学生针对教育条件改善,反抗资产阶级专政及其镇压工具的斗争精神,热烈支持法国学生组织发布的《十项要求》,热烈支持法国各界的工会和群众组织参与进对全法国学生的支援。法国学生同资产阶级政府的正义斗争,一定能够排除万难,取得彻底胜利。 法国资本主义镇压…

👍19👎4💩1🤡1🤮1

2 Oct 2026, 04:36 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

据相关消息,10月1日,无产阶级文化大革命初期造反派蒯大富去世,享年81岁。蒯大富,1945年9月出生于江苏滨海,清华大学工程化学系1967届学生。无产阶级文化大革命初期北京造反派“五大领袖”之一(与聂元梓、韩爱晶、谭厚兰、王大宾并称),人称“蒯司令”。 1966年6月文革爆发后,他作为大三学生,率先贴大字报、公开辩论并要求赶走驻清华的工作组(叶林任组长,王光美参与),主张夺权,因此被打成“右派”“反革命”,开除团籍并关押约18天。毛泽东回京批评工作组后,他获“解放”并迅速崛起:康生等人安排他参加积极分子大会,周恩来曾代表中央了解情况并为其平反。他随后参与创建并领导清华大学井冈山兵团(后为第一把手),并担任首都大专院校红卫兵革命造反总司令部(“三司”)副司令等职。 1966年12月,率五千余人游行至天安门,率先公开喊出“打倒刘少奇”“打倒邓小平”等口号,推动相关批斗。1967年他进入北京市革委会常委等机构,参与批斗老干部等活…

💩7😁3🤔2❤1

20 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,440 views16 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/8do4eqDsCRg?si=5NtmAJIrzQb1zLMb 这是韩国马克思主义者创办的YouTube频道,我们代为宣传。 韩国的马克思主义运动尚处在一个不成熟的阶段,还请大家多多支持。

❤12👎4

19 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC947 views19 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @GRPCastPhoto

https://redmolisha.github.io/glorious-revolution-podcast/ 播客网站测试,欢迎大家来尝鲜访问,目前电脑访问最佳

🤮15👎2❤1👍1

15 Sept 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,220 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026

公示修正: 经读者建议,我们在这里指正之前的公示: 1. 这里所指的维基是“革命马列毛维基”,网址是 https://wiki.gongge491001.org 。 2. 这里的“斗争前线”只是“斗争阵线”的公开群组名称。“斗争阵线”是一个马列毛革命组织,“斗争前线”是一个在 Telegram 平台上现已被解散的公开群组。 3. “一个组织因为怕做错事不敢开展革命工作”这句话是指在报刊中刊载给人的一种印象。

🤮19🖕5👍1

15 Sept 2026, 03:52 UTC≈1,140 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026

《工人革命报》念毛期 报刊更正公示: 斗争前线曾表示工作做多怕做错,于是宁可不做。我和一部分同志在私下讨论过——屁话。 此话有误,属于扩大范围了。斗争前线指的仅是维基词条,而不是“一个组织因为怕做错事不敢开展革命工作”。

👎13🤣4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @gong_ge_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gong_ge_news edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTCFinal Results59 voters

是否需要在 SimpleX 也开设官方渠道?

  1. 需要39%
  2. 不需要61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTCAnonymous Poll109 voters

如果工革报要出左翼的真正自由的革命维基百科,同志们会来贡献吗

  1. ✅73%
  2. ❌27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“工革报发布室” (@gong_ge_news), 19,197 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gong_ge_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.