12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -1,116. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,321–17,771 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 10:47
16,488
-290
15 Aug 2026, 19:54
16,778
-26
14 Aug 2026, 06:14
16,804
-148
12 Aug 2026, 22:25
16,952
-87
11 Aug 2026, 19:42
17,039
-26
10 Aug 2026, 18:31
17,065
-119
9 Aug 2026, 20:53
17,184
-304
8 Aug 2026, 20:36
17,488
-68
7 Aug 2026, 21:10
17,556
-42
6 Aug 2026, 18:40
17,598
-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:17
17,604
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:30
17,604
first reading
Engagement
390 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.05%
avg views ÷ 16,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
338
389 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.599%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
390
of 390 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 136 of 389 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
390 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
131,494
Reactions total
316
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈43,100
Videos
≈17,600
Links
≈30,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
302 reactions across 118 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
84
27.8%
👎
65
21.5%
👍
54
17.9%
😡
39
12.9%
💔
33
10.9%
🔥
11
3.64%
🤨
7
2.32%
😐
4
1.32%
👏
3
0.993%
😱
1
0.331%
🙏
1
0.331%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 390 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 390 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♦️آغاز دومین مرحله پرداخت وام فوری ۱۵۰ میلیونی بازنشستگان کشور
🔹دومین مرحله پرداخت وام فوری ۱۵۰ میلیون تومانی ویژه بازنشستگان و مستمریبگیران تأمین اجتماعی آغاز شد.
🔹بر اساس دستورالعمل اعلامی، این تسهیلات بدون نیاز به ارائه چک یا ضامن ،بازپرداخت یکساله و اعتبار آن در کمتر از یکروز کاری پرداخت میشود.
🔹فرآیند ثبت درخواست و ارائه مدارک بهصورت غیرحضوری انجام شده و متقاضیان برای ثبت درخواست نیازی به مراجعه به بانک ند…
♦️علت آلودگی نفتی خلیج فارس مشخص شد
مدیرعامل سازمان بنادر و دریانوردی:
🔹در بحث آلودگی نفتی، متأسفانه بخشی از آلودگیها در دریا ناشی از عملیات دریایی، بهویژه عملیات کشتی به کشتی در حوزه نفتی است، اما در جریان جنگ رمضان نیز به دلیل اصابت پرتابهها به برخی کشتیها و خسارتهای واردشده، نشتی مواد نفتی رخ داد.
@akhbare_hormozgan
♦️تعطیلی موقت بندر مسافری شهید ذاکری قشم به دلیل شرایط جوی
مدیریت بنادر و دریانوردی:
🔹فعالیت بندر مسافربری شهید ذاکری قشم بهدلیل پیشبینی شرایط نامساعد جوی و ناپایداری وضعیت دریا در روز دوشنبه ۲۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ متوقف شد.
🔹 بازگشایی مجدد این بندر و ازسرگیری ترددهای دریایی، پس از بررسی شرایط جوی و اطمینان از ایمنی مسیرها انجام خواهد شد. مسافران پیش از حرکت، آخرین وضعیت تردد را بررسی کنند.
@akhbare_hormozgan
هر روز خود را آغاز کنید با:
بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ
🔹با خواندن دعای عهد و چند دقیقه گفتگو روزانه با امام زمان (عج)، پیمان همراهی و خدمتگزاریمان را تازه کنیم.
#صبح_نو
امروز سهشنبه
۲۷ مرداد ماه
۵ ربیعالأول ۱۴۴۸
۱۸ آگوست ۲۰۲۶
@akhbare_hormozgan
🔸اوقات شرعی فردا سه شنبه ۲۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ به افق بندرعباس (احتیاط یک تا دو دقیقهای لحاظ شود)
🌱وقت دعا ما رو هم به خاطر داشته باشید🌱
یاحق
@akhbare_hormozgan
♦️آتشبس هیچ
🔹آتشبس ۶۰ روزه میان ایران و آمریکا در حالی به پایان خود نزدیک میشود که به دلیل بدعهدیها و اقدامات آمریکا، از همان ابتدا نیز چندان شبیه یک آتشبس واقعی نبود. در طول این مدت، موارد مختلفی از نقض تعهدات و افزایش فشارها مطرح شد و همین مسئله، آتشبس را کاملا بیمعنی کرد. اکنون برخی رسانهها از احتمال تمدید شدن این آتشبس هیچ خبر میدهند، آتشبسی که در صورت تمدید احتمالا بازهم هیچ خواهد بود.
🔹هشتصدوسیوش…
♦️اقتصاد هنوز در شوک؛ رشد ۱.۲ درصدی که خبر خوبی نیست
🔹تازهترین آمار تراکنشهای شاپرک در تیرماه، تصویری نگرانکننده از اقتصاد ایران ترسیم میکند. ارزش تراکنشها نسبت به ماه قبل تنها ۱.۲ درصد افزایش یافته اما با حذف اثر تورم، رشد واقعی به نزدیک منفی ۲ درصد میرسد.
🔹اگرچه شرایط نسبت به اسفند و فروردین، همزمان با جنگ تمامعیار، بهتر شده، اما افت شدید تعداد تراکنشها نشان میدهد اقتصاد هنوز از فضای رکودی و جنگی خارج نش…
♦️آلودگی نفتی قشم
🔹 طبق نظرسنجی دیشب کانال «اخبار هرمزگان»، مهمترین نگرانی مردم درباره ادامه آلودگی ، آسیب به زندگی مردم و اقتصاد محلی بود.
@akhbare_hormozgan
Signed Admin
Showing the 12 most recent of 390 posts we hold for @akhbare_hormozgan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@akhbare_hormozgan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آیا نانواییهای محله شما کیفیت نان مطلوبی ارائه میدهند؟
بله، راضیام20%
خیر، نیاز به نظارت بیشتر دارد82%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 با وجود اعلام مسئولان مبنی بر اینکه برق قطع نخواهد شد، حالا تجربه مردم میتواند مشخص کند این وعده تا چه اندازه عملی شده است.
شما طی این مدت قطعی برق داشتهاید؟
بله79%
خیر21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 390 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 985,313 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار هرمزگان” (@akhbare_hormozgan), 16,488 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akhbare_hormozgan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
