Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LES LETTRES LIBRES

@leslettreslibres

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002667830365
TypeChannel
Username@leslettreslibres
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/leslettreslibres

Growth

414241.511 Aug 2026, 20:45 — 41 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:34 — 42 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:4512 Aug 2026, 07:34
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:3442+1
11 Aug 2026, 20:4541first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
178.2%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.8
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.083%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,347
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Stanislas_Berton

Donald Trump vient de signer un décret présidentiel concernant les vaccins infantiles: -séparation de rougeole, oreillons, rubéole entre trois vaccins différents et non combinés, avec espacement des injections -fin de la vaccination hépatite B, Covid et grippe pour les enfants -possibilité d'attaquer les états qui violent les droits des enfants en cas de refus de vaccinations pour raisons religieuses ou médicales

11 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @valeriebugault

Merci 🙏 aux "Lettres libres" de relayer mon 2nd article de décryptage de la genèse de notre prison cognitive et conceptuelle actuelle => https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fleslettreslibres.com%2Fanonymat-capitaux-gouvernement-pantins%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android

11 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,200 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Et si l'anonymat des capitaux et celui du pouvoir politique relevaient d'un même principe ? De la société anonyme née à Amsterdam en 1602 au parlementarisme, Valérie Bugault suit un mécanisme commun : l'effacement du maître réel derrière celui qui apparaît. Actionnaire invisible, pantin politique : deux figures d'un même dispositif ? Cet article est accompagné d'une note de rédaction rédigée par Anne-Emmanuelle Le

1

11 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC8 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Peut-on encore parler de séparation des pouvoirs ? Laurent Mucchielli, ancien directeur de recherche au CNRS, décrit dans notre podcast les « portes tournantes » de la haute justice française : le même homme contrôle une loi, puis rejoint le cabinet du ministre qui l'a promulguée. Il rappelle que Nicolas Sarkozy, condamné définitivement, a siégé au Conseil constitutionnel. Une faille ancienne, que la crise du Covid

10 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @france_soir

🚨 Janvier 2021 : Fauci écrit en privé que la 2e dose du vaccin Covid « pourrait théoriquement être associée à une fausse couche au 1er trimestre ». Juillet 2021 : Peter McCullough, Dr JF Lesgards et l'association BonsensOrg alertent déjà les parlementaires français sur l’expérimental, les lacunes et le consentement éclairé. 5 ans plus tard, les SMS confirment l’écart. Le débat revient avec les révélations des SMS

10 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC3 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @france_soir

🚨 98 % des études POSITIVES sur les traitements précoces à bas coût (HCQ, ivermectine, vitamine D…) ont été CENSURÉES par les médias mainstream. Pendant ce temps, les résultats favorables des traitements chers étaient amplifiés.Analyse choc de c19early.org (6 000+ études) + enquête France-Soir. Les données sont là. Qui osera encore parler de « science » unique ? Le décryptage vidéo : https://www.youtube.com/watch?

9 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC12 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

LETTRE BRÈVE DE LES LETTRES LIBRES VACCINATION OBLIGATOIRE EN FRANCE : DÉMÊLER LE VRAI DU FAUX Un article largement relayé affirme qu’une « nouvelle proposition de loi » sur la vaccination obligatoire aurait récemment été déposée en France, relançant une bataille politique autour d’une vaccination imposée « pour tous ». La réalité est différente. Aucune nouvelle proposition de loi imposant une vaccination générale

8 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC8 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @france_soir

🚨 Victoire historique aux USA : un juge fédéral protège enfin le droit des médecins à soigner selon leur conscience. Le Dr Pierre Kory gagne contre la Californie : plus de radiation pour avoir dit la vérité aux patients sur le Covid. Pendant ce temps, Fauci invoque 111 fois le droit au silence… et est frappé d’outrage au Congrès. Deux médecins. Deux combats. L’un pour le serment d’Hippocrate. L’autre pour se protég

8 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @alexandrahenrioncaudePhoto

SINGAPOUR Doublement des MORTS-NÉS d'avr. à déc. 2022! Y-aurait-il eu PLUS de naissances? Non:elles ont chuté. Que s'est-il passé il y a 9 mois(été 2021)? 80% des singapouriens ont été vaccinés par #ARNm 👉Soutenez #LesApprentisSorciers ➡️https://www.ica.gov.sg/news-and-publications/statistics Pour rester informé sans peur, sans excès et en action 👉 https://t.me/alexandrahenrioncaude

8 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

LA REVUE DE PRESSE DE LES LETTRES LIBRES — Semaine du 3 au 8 août 2026 La revue de presse du 3 au 8 août, avec un fil qui la traverse : les mots du pouvoir, et le pouvoir des mots. Au programme : un pouvoir algorithmique qui gouverne sans se nommer, une séparation des pouvoirs présentée comme une imposture, une doxa sanitaire passée au crible, et un poème qui rend aux mots leur liberté. De l'algorithme au poème, ch

7 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

FRANCE ET DÉNATALITÉ https://www.philippe-ris.fr/bd-nous-voulons-davantage-denfants-mais-savons-nous-encore-proteger-ceux-qui-naissent/

7 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC9 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Hélène Banoun donnera une conférence « Vaccins pédiatriques et biopolitique » à Anglet-Biarritz le 5 septembre.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @leslettreslibres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,677 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LES LETTRES LIBRES” (@leslettreslibres), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leslettreslibres.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.