Channel
@politoscopeFR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001589007655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @politoscopeFR |
| Description | Espace de décryptage fondé sur l’analyse critique de l’offre politique |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/politoscopeFR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 103 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 103 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Le philosophe-petite-pute-du-régime est décidément un excellent cas d'étude et un parfait prétexte pour identifier les leviers rhétoriques, de manière à mieux les contrer, de leur propagande morbide. https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2073175184924643339?s=63&t=4AQLqjyoNrxxonlkPl8piQ
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
Petit contre-florilège, à l'usage d'un siècle qui a honte de mourir - et pour remettre à sa place le philosophe d'opérette à la solde du régime, j'ai nommé Enthoven (sur l'euthanasie) Thread sur X : https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2072382902340292913 J'ai aussi publié ce thread, devenu article sur Politoscope : https://politoscope.fr/loi-euthanasie-et-tartuffes-subventionnes-le-desastre-cognitif-incarne-par-u…
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
"Nous voulons changer l'homme pour changer la société": vous avez dans cette phrase tout l'orgueil luciférien des franc-maçons. Le chrétien sait que l'on ne change pas l'homme. Il part au contraire de ce que nous sommes, à savoir de pauvres pécheurs, et il essaie péniblement et humblement d'avancer vers la sainteté. Et le chrétien n'essaie pas de changer la société, il essaie de la rendre plus juste, plus digne, pl…
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2067243093850554826?s=46 Ce message constitue un argument important à l'attention de tous ceux qui sont en quête de liberté - mais qui n'ont pas encore clarifié la méthode pour la retrouver.
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
Je connais plutôt bien le monde des entreprises où j'ai longtemps officié. Je vais donc vous raconter une histoire, celle du fameux Nicolas : pas seulement le celui "qui paye" mais celui qui finit par voir et comprendre grâce à ses compétences dont il constate le déclassement dans un monde devenu absurde. Cette histoire devrait évoquer beaucoup de choses pour vous tous. Elle m'est inspirée par un nouveau membre du …
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
Voici pourquoi la French Theory n'a pas fabriqué le wokisme ; et pourquoi croire (et faire croire) qu'elle l'a fait est le symptôme exact du mal qu'on prétend diagnostiquer... https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2056408232088707565
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
PS : et voici la véritable moralité de cette soirée - que je vous invite à partager massivement : https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2054683361772273976?s=20
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
[DIRECT] Ce Mercredi 13 Mai dès 21h avec Philippe Guillemant "Quand la physique pulvérise le matérialisme : ce que la science refuse encore de vous dire" https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2053944243593662914 (PS : et Jeudi, nous serons en dire t aussi, avec Alexis Poulin, qui a rejoint le PIC 🙂 - je ferai une autre annonce))
❤1
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
RDV à 19h : MERCI à l'amie @Resistance_SM, Myriam, de susciter le dialogue pour que nous puissions, en réaction au direct de la semaine dernière avec @AlexandreJardin, expliciter les enjeux autour du lancement de son application en faveur d'un "RIC" porté par une application "blockchain / Open SOurce / Zero knowledge." Des inquiétudes ont été exprimées et son tout à fait légitimes - j'expliciterai pourquoi le #PIC s…
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
[DIRECT - ce soir 21h] Qui vérifie les vérificateurs ? Amélie Ismaïli ( @ame_ism ) démonte la machine à fabriquer le consensus. Il y a des journalistes qui font leur travail, et il y a ceux qui décident de regarder comment ce travail est fait — par qui, pour qui, et surtout : financé par qui. Amélie Ismaïli appartient à cette seconde catégorie, plus rare et nettement plus dérangeante. Fondatrice du site Rechecking …
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
« On passe à l’action, ça vous dit ? » - ce mardi, 21h [vrai DIRECT]. Vous penserez ce que vous voudrez d'Alexandre Jardin : comme vous tous, il m'est arrivé de perdre confiance et de pousser le concept de vigilance sur toutes personnalités ostensiblement engagées jusqu'au curseur qu'on appelle « réflexe paranoïde » - je plaide volontiers coupable. Et je le revendique. Comme le disait Andy Grove, « seuls les paranos…
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
Questiologie : de la qualité d'une question posée peut découler le plus puissant des stimuli pour l'intelligence (individuelle ou collective). La pertinence pour le #PIC et la démocratie est spectaculaire. lire : https://x.com/parrhesiaste_fr/status/2048141611847324143
Signed Le Parrhésiaste (Fred) #PIC🇫🇷 (@parrhesiaste_fr sur X)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @politoscopeFR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 832,945 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@politoscopeFR named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Canal Politoscope TV” (@politoscopeFR), 103 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politoscopeFR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.