Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
IASEC Mains Conference
@iasecmainsconference
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,140subscribers
+109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001622389155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iasecmainsconference |
| Description | This is CSE- mains annual conference channel of @iasexamcongress. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iasecmainsconference |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:41 | 7,140 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 7,148 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 7,147 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 7,146 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 7,148 | +45 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:35 | 7,103 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 7,107 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 7,109 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:18 | 7,118 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 7,117 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 7,106 | +69 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 7,037 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 7,041 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 7,050 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 7,043 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 7,030 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 7,027 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 7,030 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 7,029 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 7,032 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.4%
- avg views ÷ 7,140 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,460
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (7 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 27,737 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 02:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 356
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 594
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Article by Sashi Tharoor on Inter State Council(ISC) and how it can be used to resolve Centre-State disputes: Context: Delimitation bill is being debated in Parliament. Tharoor argues it bypasses the states. No forum currently exists for resolution, Hence the call to revive the ISC. Constitutional Basis: ➡️Article 263: The President can set up a council to coordinate Centre-state and inter-state matters. ➡️Its func…
According to the World Bank's October 2026 Poverty and Equity Brief: 1.India recorded one of the fastest poverty declines globally, lifting 496 million people out of extreme poverty between 2011 and 2023. 2.The share of the population living in extreme poverty fell sharply from 27.1% to 2.6%. 3.The rate below lower-middle-income line (USD 4.20/day) dropped from 57.7% to 16.1%. 4.Non-monetary poverty also decrease…
Infographic of Prof Ashok Gulati's article on Fertilizer Imbalance and it's impact Article link 🔗 https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/we-need-to-address-the-issue-of-soil-health-four-steps-can-improve-the-situation-10936568/lite/
Detailed infographic explaining the recent wave of protests and social unrest across European countries. #Infographic
@iasexamcongress announces Thematic Test Series (TTS-2027) for CSE Prelims 2027. A full length tests (FLTs) only test series. A total of 10 FLTs starting 25th October 2026. (Video discussions and detailed solutions) Contact @Shunyashashvata
Photo, posted without a caption
The Supreme Court of India, in Just Rights for Children Alliance v. S. Harish (2026), held that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right under Articles 21 and 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, including for children. Constitutional Basis for Internet Access: ➡️Anuradha Bhasin v Union of India (2020): freedom of speech and expression, and the freedom to carry on trade or business through the intern…
Photo, posted without a caption
Article on Revamp Functioning of Parliament: ➡️Delimitation debate looks like simple arithmetic: more citizens per MP, so add more MPs, but representation is not just the number of MPs. ➡️Elected members need the institutional space to speak for their constituents. Adding seats without strengthening functional capacity leaves representatives “muted on the floor”. ➡️Two Layers of Parliamentary Representation: Voter…
Recently NCW held a consultation on women’s right to property and access to social and economic justice, aimed at making inclusive growth sustainable. Distributive vs Compensatory Justice: ➡️ Women’s empowerment has so far been limited to welfare schemes, reservation and protection against discrimination. This is compensatory justice, which is not enough for Viksit Bharat@2047. ➡️ Distributive justice should take …
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @iasecmainsconference. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Optional_toppers_notes · 42,595
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@SOMP_Essay · 26,808
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
@IASExamcongress · 38,278
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@jayantparikshit · 22,185
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
@HandWritten_Notes1 · 33,786
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
@saurabhPolity · 8
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
@asad_zuberi · 22,815
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@csp20info · 52,428
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
@PriyanshaIAS · 22,812
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@sriasofficial · 30,820
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
@vjspeaks · 34,092
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@csp23info · 46,455
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@upsc_plan · 31,168
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
@essaykaise1 · 23,827
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@shubhamkr_ias · 89,672
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
@csepaper2atish · 118,080
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@legendbhaiyamains · 26,153
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
@PSIR_Civils_Front · 21,298
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
@anmolvachan1 · 55,246
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@hinduhighlights · 132,756
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@visioniastestseries9 · 19,357
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 October 2026
@SOMPGUIDANCE · 92,553
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@shreyansias · 25,718
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
@karmayogi_ias · 54,458
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IASEC Mains Conference” (@iasecmainsconference), 7,140 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iasecmainsconference.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.