Channel
@SociologyTasks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,607subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001817387781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SociologyTasks |
| Description | Founder & Owner: Flâneuse 🏆 (@Vinzvar) https://www.youtube.com/@DecipheringSociology 📚 Decipher Books: @SociologyTasksDecipher 👩🏫 Decipher Courses: @DecipheringSociology |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SociologyTasks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 4,607 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 4,593 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 4,590 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 4,590 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,469 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
22 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 90.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Beyond the breakdown of law enforcement and medical ETHICS, a sociological perspective reveals how systemic cultural pressures, market-driven MEDICAL CAPITALISM, and compromised institutional power structures sustain illegal ABORTION networks. #DecipherSociology #News@SociologyTasks
👍1
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
The last lap is here. 🏆✨ We know you’re tired. We know there are days when you feel you could have revised more, written more tests, remembered more. But right now, don’t measure your preparation by what is still left. Look at how far you’ve already come. ❤️ You don’t need to know everything. You just need to stay calm, trust what you know, revise smartly and keep showing up for these final few days. No unnecessar…
❤2
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
LADAKH begins its POPULATION ENUMERATION on August 17, 2026, pioneering Independent India's first open-ended caste enumeration within a 40-parameter census framework. This move transitions caste from a localized political talking point to an officially mapped SOCIOLOGICAL VARIABLE, carrying profound implications for structural visibility, resource distribution, and social identity. #DecipherSociology #News@Sociology…
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
Examining MINING around RAMSAR WETLAND SITES from a sociological perspective requires analyzing the complex friction between environmental conservation, economic development, and social equity. While recent judicial actions—such as the August 2026 Supreme Court of India ruling expanding a 10-km mining buffer zone around all wetland conservation reserves—are celebrated as ecological victories, they fundamentally alter…
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
✍️ DEC!PHER SOCIOLOGY MICRO-NOTES 2026 Password dsm2026 #DecipherSociology
❤4
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
🏆 DEC!PHER SOCIOLOGY VALUE-ADDITION MATERIAL Introduction (most from sangwan)
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
MIGRATION from North East India to Indian cities has grown steadily, but urban spaces often deny migrants security and belonging through racial discrimination and precarious work. The COVID-19 lockdowns exposed this vulnerability, triggering return migration. Yet instability in the North East, especially ethnic conflict in Manipur, forced renewed displacement. This cyclical movement reflects a persistent condition of…
❤1
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
The CAUVERY WATER DISPUTE is fundamentally a conflict over a scarce natural resource, but from a sociological perspective, it is a complex struggle involving identity politics, regional sub-nationalism, rural-urban disparities, and class-caste dynamics. Rather than being a mere legal or hydrological argument between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, sociologists view the crisis as a lens through which broader societal fractu…
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
A sociological perspective on SEX WORK in India moves away from purely moral or legal judgments to analyze how the profession is shaped by structural inequalities, power dynamics, and social institutions. Sociologists examine how intersecting systems of caste, class, gender, and state policy relegate sex workers to the MARGINS of Indian society while simultaneously relying on their labor. 🔺CONTEXT: The Supreme Court…
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
The ongoing STUDENT PROTESTS in Ranchi against JPSC and JSSC examination irregularities represent a structural crisis of trust, social mobility, and YOUTH ALIENATION in contemporary India. Driven by allegations of paper leaks, evaluation errors, and systemic corruption, thousands of job aspirants have turned locations like Bapu Vatika and the Jaipal Singh Munda stadium into zones of active resistance. #DecipherSocio…
❤1
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
🚨 EARLY BIRD OFFER ENDS ON 15TH AUGUST! ⏳ Every great Sociology answer begins with one disciplined day of practice. SAWP 2027 is designed to help you build consistency, analytical depth, and answer-writing confidence through daily practice, expert feedback, and continuous mentorship. ✨ What you’ll get: • 170+ Sociology Answer Writing Practice Questions • Complete Coverage of Paper I & Paper II • Detailed Personali…
❤1
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
🔵 The sociological perspective on the BANCHHADA COMMUNITY reveals how historical trauma, alternative economic survival, and inverted patriarchal roles can institutionalize intergenerational exploitation. Key analytical angles include historical marginalization under the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871, the functional inversion of gender investment, and cultural conditioning that normalizes deviance as tradition. #Deciph…
❤1
Signed ⋆⋆ EYK ⋆⋆
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @SociologyTasks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 223,191 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sociology Tasks” (@SociologyTasks), 4,607 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SociologyTasks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.